Surgical Explantation of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Bioprostheses: A Statewide Experience

BACKGROUND: Despite the rapid adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) since its initial approval in 2011, the frequency and outcomes of surgical explantation of TAVR devices (TAVR-explant) is poorly understood. METHODS: Patients undergoing TAVR-explant between January 2012 and June 2020 at 33 hospitals in Michigan were identified in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database and linked to index TAVR data from the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry through a statewide quality collaborative. The primary outcome was operative mortality. Indications for TAVR-explant, contraindications to redo TAVR, operative data, and outcomes were collected from Society of Thoracic Surgeons and Transcatheter Valve Therapy databases. Baseline Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was compared between index TAVR and TAVR-explant. RESULTS: Twenty-four surgeons at 12 hospitals performed TAVR-explants in 46 patients (median age, 73). The frequency of TAVR-explant was 0.4%, and the number of explants increased annually. Median time to TAVR-explant was 139 days and among known device types explanted, most were self-expanding valves (29/41, 71%). Common indications for TAVR-explant were procedure-related failure (35%), paravalvular leak (28%), and need for other cardiac surgery (26%). Contraindications to redo TAVR included need for other cardiac surgery (28%), unsuitable noncoronary anatomy (13%), coronary obstruction (11%), and endocarditis (11%). Overall, 65% (30/46) of patients underwent concomitant procedures, including aortic repair/replacement in 33% (n=15), mitral surgery in 22% (n=10), and coronary artery bypass grafting in 16% (n=7). The median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 4.2% at index TAVR and 9.3% at TAVR-explant (P=0.001). Operative mortality was 20% (9/46) and 76% (35/46) of patients had in-hospital complications. Of patients alive at discharge, 37% (17/37) were discharged home and overall 3-month survival was 73±14%. CONCLUSIONS: TAVR-explant is rare but increasing, and its clinical impact is substantial. As the utilization of TAVR expands into younger and lower-risk patients, providers should consider the potential for future TAVR-explant during selection of an initial valve strategy

Hydration-induced spin-glass state in a frustrated Na-Mn-O triangular lattice

Birnessite compounds are stable across a wide range of compositions that produces a remarkable diversity in their physical, electrochemical, and functional properties. These are hydrated analogs of the magnetically frustrated, mixed-valent manganese oxide structures, with general formula, NaxMnO2. Here we demonstrate that the direct hydration of layered rock-salt type ?-NaMnO2, with the geometrically frustrated triangular lattice topology, yields the birnessite type oxide, Na0.36MnO2?0.2H2O, transforming its magnetic properties. This compound has a much-expanded interlayer spacing compared to its parent ?-NaMnO2 compound. We show that while the parent ?-NaMnO2 possesses a Néel temperature of 45 K as a result of broken symmetry in the Mn3+ sublattice, the hydrated derivative undergoes collective spin freezing at 29 K within the Mn3+/Mn4+ sublattice. Scaling-law analysis of the frequency dispersion of the ac susceptibility, as well as the temperature-dependent, low-field dc magnetization confirm a cooperative spin-glass state of strongly interacting spins. This is supported by complementary spectroscopic analysis [high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron miscroscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, and electron energy-loss spectroscopy] as well as by a structural investigation (high-resolution TEM, x-ray, and neutron powder diffraction) that yield insights into the chemical and atomic structure modifications. We conclude that the spin-glass state in birnessite is driven by the spin frustration imposed by the underlying triangular lattice topology that is further enhanced by the in-plane bond-disorder generated by the mixed-valent character of manganese in the layers

Comparison of Evaluations for Heart Transplant Before Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device and Subsequent Receipt of Transplant at Transplant vs Nontransplant Centers

IMPORTANCE: In 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services revised its national coverage determination, removing the requirement to obtain review from a Medicare-approved heart transplant center to implant a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) for bridge-to-transplant (BTT) intent at an LVAD-only center. The association between center-level transplant availability and access to heart transplant, the gold-standard therapy for advanced heart failure (HF), is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of center transplant availability with LVAD implant strategies and subsequent heart transplant following LVAD implant before the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs multicenter US registry database was conducted from April 1, 2012, to June 30, 2020. The population included patients with HF receiving a primary durable LVAD. EXPOSURES: LVAD center transplant availability (LVAD/transplant vs LVAD only). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were implant strategy as BTT and subsequent transplant by 2 years. Covariates that might affect listing strategy and outcomes were included (eg, patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities) in multivariable models. Parameters for BTT listing were estimated using logistic regression with center-level random effects and for receipt of a transplant using a Cox proportional hazards regression model with death as a competing event. RESULTS: The sample included 22 221 LVAD recipients with a median age of 59.0 (IQR, 50.0-67.0) years, of whom 17 420 (78.4%) were male and 3156 (14.2%) received implants at LVAD-only centers. Receiving an LVAD at an LVAD/transplant center was associated with a 79% increased adjusted odds of BTT LVAD designation (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.35-2.38; P \u3c .001). The 2-year transplant rate following LVAD implant was 25.6% at LVAD/transplant centers and 11.9% at LVAD-only centers. There was an associated 33% increased rate of transplant at LVAD/transplant centers compared with LVAD-only centers (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.17-1.51) with a similar hazard for death at 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90-1.08). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Receiving an LVAD at an LVAD-transplant center was associated with increased odds of BTT intent at implant and subsequent transplant receipt for patients at 2 years. The findings of this study suggest that Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy change may have the unintended consequence of further increasing inequities in access to transplant among patients at LVAD-only centers

International Consensus Statement on Rhinology and Allergy: Rhinosinusitis

Background: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR‐RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR‐RS‐2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence‐based findings of the document. Methods: ICAR‐RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence‐based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence‐based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary. Results: ICAR‐RS‐2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence‐based management algorithm is provided. Conclusion: This ICAR‐RS‐2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence‐based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS

Implementation and Effectiveness of Opioid Prescribing Guidelines After Hiatal Hernia Repair

INTRODUCTION: We defined institutional opioid prescribing patterns, established prescribing guidelines, and evaluated the adherence to and effectiveness of these guidelines in association with opioid prescribing after hiatal hernia repair (HHR). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed for patients who underwent transthoracic (open) or laparoscopic HHR between January and December 2016. Patient-reported opioid use after surgery was used to establish prescribing recommendations. Guideline efficacy was then evaluated among patients undergoing HHR after implementation (August 2018 to June 2019). Data are reported in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). RESULTS: The initial cohort included n = 87 patients (35 open; 52 laparoscopic) with a 68% survey response rate. For open repair, median prescription size was 338 mg OME (interquartile range [IQR] 250-420) with patient-reported use of 215 mg OME (IQR 78-308) (P = 0.002). Similarly, median prescription size was 270 mg OME (IQR 200-319) with patient-reported use of 100 mg OME (IQR 4-239) (P \u3c 0.001) for laparoscopic repair. Opioid prescribing guidelines were defined as the 66th percentile of patient-reported opioid use. Postguideline implementation cohort included n = 108 patients (36 open; 72 laparoscopic). Median prescription amount decreased by 54% for open and 43% laparoscopic repair, with no detectable change in the overall refill rate after guideline implementation. Patient education, opioid storage, and disposal practices were also characterized. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines can be successfully implemented for open and laparoscopic HHR with a high rate of compliance and without an associated increase in opioid refills

Repeat crossclamp after failed initial degenerative mitral valve repair is safe and successfulCentral MessagePerspective

Objective: Surgical risk and long-term outcomes when re-crossclamp is required during degenerative mitral valve repair are unknown. We examined the outcomes of patients who required re-crossclamp for mitral valve reintervention. Methods: Adults undergoing mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral valve disease at a single center from 2007 to 2021 who required more than 1 crossclamp for mitral valve reintervention were included. Outcomes including major morbidity and 30-day mortality were collected. Kaplan–Meier analysis characterized survival and freedom from recurrent mitral regurgitation. Results: A total of 69 patients required re-crossclamp for mitral valve reintervention. Of those, 72% (n = 50) underwent successful re-repair and the remaining underwent mitral valve replacement (28%, n = 19). Major morbidity occurred in 23% (n = 16). There was no 30-day mortality, and median long-term survival was 10.9 years for those undergoing re-repair and 7.2 years for those undergoing replacement (P = .79). Midterm echocardiography follow-up was available for 67% (33/50) of patients who were successfully re-repaired with a median follow-up of 20 (interquartile range, 7-37) months. At late follow-up, 90% of patients had mild or less mitral regurgitation. Of those re-repaired, 2 patients later required mitral valve reintervention. Conclusions: Patients requiring re-crossclamp for residual mitral regurgitation had low perioperative morbidity and no mortality. Most patients underwent successful re-repair (vs mitral valve replacement) with excellent valve function and long-term survival. In the event of unsatisfactory repair at the time of mitral valve repair, attempt at re-repair is safe and successful with the appropriate valvar anatomy