93 research outputs found

    Actors, actions, and initiative in normative system specification

    Get PDF
    The logic of norms, called deontic logic, has been used to specify normative constraints for information systems. For example, one can specify in deontic logic the constraints that a book borrowed from a library should be returned within three weeks, and that if it is not returned, the library should send a reminder. Thus, the notion of obligation to perform an action arises naturally in system specification. Intuitively, deontic logic presupposes the concept of anactor who undertakes actions and is responsible for fulfilling obligations. However, the concept of an actor has not been formalized until now in deontic logic. We present a formalization in dynamic logic, which allows us to express the actor who initiates actions or choices. This is then combined with a formalization, presented earlier, of deontic logic in dynamic logic, which allows us to specify obligations, permissions, and prohibitions to perform an action. The addition of actors allows us to expresswho has the responsibility to perform an action. In addition to the application of the concept of an actor in deontic logic, we discuss two other applications of actors. First, we show how to generalize an approach taken up by De Nicola and Hennessy, who eliminate from CCS in favor of internal and external choice. We show that our generalization allows a more accurate specification of system behavior than is possible without it. Second, we show that actors can be used to resolve a long-standing paradox of deontic logic, called the paradox of free-choice permission. Towards the end of the paper, we discuss whether the concept of an actor can be combined with that of an object to formalize the concept of active objects

    ESQL : an extended SQL with object and deductive capabilities

    Get PDF
    Projet RODINESQL is an SQL upward-compatible database language that integrates in a uniform and clean way the essential concepts of relational, object-oriented and deductive databases. ESQL is intended for traditional data processing applications as well as more complex applications such as large expert systems. Therefore, ESQL's salient features are : a rich and extendible type system based on abstract data types (ADTs) implemented in various programming languages ; complex objects with object sharing by combining generic ADTs and object identity ; the capability of querying and updating relations containing simple or complex objects using SQL-compatible syntax and semantics ; and a Datalog-like deductive capability provided as an extension of the SQL view mechanism. ESQL's functional semantics enables uniform manipulation of ESQL data and should facilitate the implementation of the ESQL compiler

    The future of enterprise groupware applications

    Get PDF
    This paper provides a review of groupware technology and products. The purpose of this review is to investigate the appropriateness of current groupware technology as the basis for future enterprise systems and evaluate its role in realising, the currently emerging, Virtual Enterprise model for business organisation. It also identifies in which way current technological phenomena will transform groupware technology and will drive the development of the enterprise systems of the future

    Semantics of Database Transformations

    Get PDF
    Database transformations arise in many different settings including database integration, evolution of database systems, and implementing user views and data entry tools. This paper surveys approaches that have been taken to problems in these settings, assesses their strengths and weaknesses, and develops require ments on a formal model for specifying and implementing database transformations. We also consider the problem of insuring the correctness of database transformations. In particular, we demonstrate that the usefulness of correctness conditions such as information preservation is hindered by the interactions of transformations and database constraints, and the limited expressive power of established database constraint languages. We conclude that more general notions of correctness are required, and that there is a need for a uniform formalism for expressing both database transformations and constraints, and reasoning about their interactions, Finally we introduce WOL, a declarative language for specifying and implementing database transformations and constraints. We briefly describe the WOL language and its semantics, and argue that it addresses many of the requirements on a formalism for dealing with general database transformations

    A Building Blocks Approach to Statistical Databases

    No full text

    Service oriented enterprises/ Khoshafian

    No full text
    xxv, 438 hal.; ill., tab.; 24 cm

    Service oriented enterprises/ Khoshafian

    No full text
    xxv, 438 hal.; ill., tab.; 24 cm
    corecore