99 research outputs found
Using smartphones as a proxy for forensic evidence contained in cloud storage services
Cloud storage services such as Dropbox, Box and SugarSync have been embraced by both individuals and organizations. This creates an environment that is potentially conducive to security breaches and malicious activities. The investigation of these cloud environments presents new challenges for the digital forensics community.
It is anticipated that smartphone devices will retain data from these storage services. Hence, this research presents a preliminary investigation into the residual artifacts created on an iOS and Android device that has accessed a cloud storage service. The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, it provides an initial assessment on the extent to which cloud storage data is stored on these client-side devices. This view acts as a proxy for data stored in the cloud. Secondly, it provides documentation on the artifacts that could be useful in a digital forensics investigation of cloud services
A comparison of forensic evidence recovery techniques for a windows mobile smart phone
<p>Acquisition, decoding and presentation of information from mobile devices is complex and challenging. Device memory is usually integrated into the device, making isolation prior to recovery difficult. In addition, manufacturers have adopted a variety of file systems and formats complicating decoding and presentation.</p>
<p>A variety of tools and methods have been developed (both commercially and in the open source community) to assist mobile forensics investigators. However, it is unclear to
what extent these tools can present a complete view of the information held on a mobile device, or the extent the results produced by different tools are consistent.</p>
<p>This paper investigates what information held on a Windows Mobile smart phone can be recovered using several different approaches to acquisition and decoding. The paper demonstrates that no one technique recovers all information of potential forensic interest from a Windows Mobile device; and that in some cases the information recovered is
conflicting.</p>
Enhancing security incident response follow-up efforts with lightweight agile retrospectives
Security incidents detected by organizations are escalating in both scale and complexity. As a result, security incident response has become a critical mechanism for organizations in an effort to minimize the damage from security incidents. The final phase within many security incident response approaches is the feedback/follow-up phase. It is within this phase that an organization is expected to use information collected during an investigation in order to learn from an incident, improve its security incident response process and positively impact the wider security environment. However, recent research and security incident reports argue that organizations find it difficult to learn from incidents.
A contributing factor to this learning deficiency is that industry focused security incident response approaches, typically, provide very little practical information about tools or techniques that can be used to extract lessons learned from an investigation. As a result, organizations focus on improving technical security controls and not examining or reassessing the effectiveness or efficiency of internal policies and procedures. An additional hindrance, to encouraging improvement assessments, is the absence of tools and/or techniques that organizations can implement to evaluate the impact of implemented enhancements in the wider organization. Hence, this research investigates the integration of lightweight agile retrospectives and meta-retrospectives, in a security incident response process, to enhance feedback and/or follow-up efforts. The research contribution of this paper is twofold. First, it presents an approach based on lightweight retrospectives as a means of enhancing security incident response follow-up efforts. Second, it presents an empirical evaluation of this lightweight approach in a Fortune 500 Financial organization's security incident response team
Rethinking Security Incident Response: The Integration of Agile Principles
In today's globally networked environment, information security incidents can
inflict staggering financial losses on organizations. Industry reports indicate
that fundamental problems exist with the application of current linear
plan-driven security incident response approaches being applied in many
organizations. Researchers argue that traditional approaches value containment
and eradication over incident learning. While previous security incident
response research focused on best practice development, linear plan-driven
approaches and the technical aspects of security incident response, very little
research investigates the integration of agile principles and practices into
the security incident response process. This paper proposes that the
integration of disciplined agile principles and practices into the security
incident response process is a practical solution to strengthening an
organization's security incident response posture.Comment: Paper presented at the 20th Americas Conference on Information
Systems (AMCIS 2014), Savannah, Georgi
Security Incident Response Criteria: A Practitioner's Perspective
Industrial reports indicate that security incidents continue to inflict large financial losses on organizations.
Researchers and industrial analysts contend that there are fundamental problems with existing security
incident response process solutions. This paper presents the Security Incident Response Criteria (SIRC)
which can be applied to a variety of security incident response approaches. The criteria are derived from
empirical data based on in-depth interviews conducted within a Global Fortune 500 organization and
supporting literature. The research contribution of this paper is twofold. First, the criteria presented in this
paper can be used to evaluate existing security incident response solutions and second, as a guide, to
support future security incident response improvement initiatives
Recovering Residual Forensic Data from Smartphone Interactions with Cloud Storage Providers
There is a growing demand for cloud storage services such as Dropbox, Box,
Syncplicity and SugarSync. These public cloud storage services can store
gigabytes of corporate and personal data in remote data centres around the
world, which can then be synchronized to multiple devices. This creates an
environment which is potentially conducive to security incidents, data breaches
and other malicious activities. The forensic investigation of public cloud
environments presents a number of new challenges for the digital forensics
community. However, it is anticipated that end-devices such as smartphones,
will retain data from these cloud storage services. This research investigates
how forensic tools that are currently available to practitioners can be used to
provide a practical solution for the problems related to investigating cloud
storage environments. The research contribution is threefold. First, the
findings from this research support the idea that end-devices which have been
used to access cloud storage services can be used to provide a partial view of
the evidence stored in the cloud service. Second, the research provides a
comparison of the number of files which can be recovered from different
versions of cloud storage applications. In doing so, it also supports the idea
that amalgamating the files recovered from more than one device can result in
the recovery of a more complete dataset. Third, the chapter contributes to the
documentation and evidentiary discussion of the artefacts created from specific
cloud storage applications and different versions of these applications on iOS
and Android smartphones
Medical Cyber-Physical Systems Development: A Forensics-Driven Approach
The synthesis of technology and the medical industry has partly contributed
to the increasing interest in Medical Cyber-Physical Systems (MCPS). While
these systems provide benefits to patients and professionals, they also
introduce new attack vectors for malicious actors (e.g. financially-and/or
criminally-motivated actors). A successful breach involving a MCPS can impact
patient data and system availability. The complexity and operating requirements
of a MCPS complicates digital investigations. Coupling this information with
the potentially vast amounts of information that a MCPS produces and/or has
access to is generating discussions on, not only, how to compromise these
systems but, more importantly, how to investigate these systems. The paper
proposes the integration of forensics principles and concepts into the design
and development of a MCPS to strengthen an organization's investigative
posture. The framework sets the foundation for future research in the
refinement of specific solutions for MCPS investigations.Comment: This is the pre-print version of a paper presented at the 2nd
International Workshop on Security, Privacy, and Trustworthiness in Medical
Cyber-Physical Systems (MedSPT 2017
In-the-wild residual data research and privacy
As the world becomes increasingly dependent on technology, researchers endeavor to understand how technology is used, the impact it has on everyday life and the life-cycle and span of digital information. In doing so, researchers are
increasingly gathering `real-world' or `in the wild' residual data, obtained from a variety of sources without the explicit consent of the original owners.
This data gathering raises significant concerns regarding privacy, ethics and legislation, as well as practical considerations concerning investigator training, data storage, overall security and disposal. This paper surveys recent studies of residual data gathered in the wild and analyses the challenges that were faced. Taking these insights, the paper presents a compendium of practices
for addressing the issues that arise in in the wild residual data research. The practices presented in this paper can be used to critique current projects and assess the feasibility of proposed future research
- …