Equivalence Principle tests, Equivalence theorems and New long-range forces

We discuss the possible existence of new long-range forces mediated by spin-1 or spin-0 particles. By adding their effects to those of gravity, they could lead to apparent violations of the Equivalence Principle. While the vector part in the couplings of a new spin-1 U boson involves, in general, a combination of the B and L currents, there may also be, in addition, an axial part as well. If the new force has a finite range \lambda, its intensity is proportional to 1/(\lambda^2 F^2), F being the extra U(1) symmetry-breaking scale. Quite surprisingly, particle physics experiments can provide constraints on such a new force, even if it is extremely weak, the corresponding gauge coupling being extremely small (<< 10^-19 !). An ``equivalence theorem'' shows that a very light spin-1 U boson does not in general decouple even when its gauge coupling vanishes, but behaves as a quasimassless spin-0 particle, having pseudoscalar couplings proportional to 1/F. Similarly, in supersymmetric theories, a very light spin-3/2 gravitino might be detectable as a quasi massless spin-1/2 goldstino, despite the extreme smallness of Newton's gravitational constant G_N, provided the supersymmetry-breaking scale is not too large. Searches for such U bosons in \psi and \Upsilon decays restrict F to be larger than the electroweak scale (the U actually becoming, as an axion, quasi ``invisible'' in particle physics for sufficiently large F). This provides strong constraints on the corresponding new force and its associated EP violations. We also discuss briefly new spin-dependent forces.Comment: 19 page

Constraints on the parity-violating couplings of a new gauge boson

High-energy particle physics experiments allow for the possible existence of a new light, very weakly coupled, neutral gauge boson (the U boson). This one permits for light (spin-1/2 or spin-0) particles to be acceptable Dark Matter candidates, by inducing sufficient (stronger than weak) annihilation cross sections into e+e-. They could be responsible for the bright 511 keV gamma ray line observed by INTEGRAL from the galactic bulge. Such a new interaction may have important consequences, especially at lower energies. Parity-violation atomic-physics experiments provide strong constraints on such a U boson, if its couplings to quarks and electrons violate parity. With the constraints coming from an unobserved axionlike behaviour of this particle, they privilegiate a pure vector coupling of the U boson to quarks and leptons, unless the corresponding symmetry is broken sufficiently above the electroweak scale.Comment: 6 page

Light spin-1/2 or spin-0 Dark Matter particles

We recall and precise how light spin-0 particles could be acceptable Dark Matter candidates, and extend this analysis to spin-1/2 particles. We evaluate the (rather large) annihilation cross sections required, and show how they may be induced by a new light neutral spin-1 boson U. If this one is vectorially coupled to matter particles, the (spin-1/2 or spin-0) Dark Matter annihilation cross section into e+e- automatically includes a v_dm^2 suppression factor at threshold, as desirable to avoid an excessive production of gamma rays from residual Dark Matter annihilations. We also relate Dark Matter annihilations with production cross sections in e+e- scatterings. Annihilation cross sections of spin-1/2 and spin-0 Dark Matter particles are given by exactly the same expressions. Just as for spin-0, light spin-1/2 Dark Matter particles annihilating into e+e- could be responsible for the bright 511 keV gamma ray line observed by INTEGRAL from the galactic bulge.Comment: 10 page

Some Comments on an MeV Cold Dark Matter Scenario

We discuss several aspects of astroparticle physics pertaining to a new model with MeV cold dark matter particles, which annihilate to electron-positron pairs in a manner yielding the correct CDM density required today, and explaining the enhanced electron-positron annihilation line from the center of the Galaxy. We note that the mass of the vector meson mediating the annihilations, should exceed the mass of CDM particle, and comment on possible enhancement due to CDM clustering, on the detectability of the new CDM, and on particle physics models incorporating this scenario.Comment: 13 pages, 2 figures. v2 - Added some remarks regarding a more stringent mass bound. References added, some typos corrected. v3 - Added a comment regarding the invalidity of perturbative calculation in the case of a very small coupling g'. Removed the comment regarding the smallness of the angular width of the 511 keV lin

About R-parity and the Supersymmetric Standard Model

We recall the obstacles which seemed, long ago, to prevent one from viewing supersymmetry as a possible fundamental symmetry of Nature. Is spontaneous supersymmetry breaking possible ? Where is the spin-1/2 Goldstone fermion of supersymmetry, if not a neutrino ? Which bosons and fermions could be related ? Can one define conserved baryon and lepton numbers in such theories, although they systematically involve self-conjugate Majorana fermions ? If we have to postulate the existence of new bosons carrying B and L (the new spin-0 squarks and sleptons), can we prevent them from mediating new unwanted interactions ? We then recall how we obtained the three basic ingredients of the Supersymmetric Standard Model: 1) the SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) gauge superfields; 2) the chiral quark and lepton superfields; 3) the two doublet Higgs superfields responsible for the electroweak breaking, and the generation of quark and lepton masses. The original continuous ``R-invariance'' of this model was soon abandoned in favor of its discrete version, R-parity, so that the gravitino, and gluinos, can acquire masses - gluinos getting their masses from supergravity, or radiative corrections. R-parity forbids unwanted squark and slepton exchanges, and guarantees the stability of the ``lightest supersymmetric particle''. It is present only since we restricted the initial superpotential to be an even function of quark and lepton superfields (so as to allow for B and L conservation laws), as made apparent by the formula re-expressing R-parity as (-1)^2S (-1)^(3B+L). Whether it turns out to be absolutely conserved, or not, R-parity plays an essential role in the phenomenology of supersymmetric theories, and the experimental searches for the new sparticles.Comment: 23 pages, Latex, no figures. To be published as a contribution to the Yuri Gol'fand Memorial Volume, M.Shifman ed., World Scientifi

Invisible Upsilon decays into Light Dark Matter

Invisible psi and Upsilon decays into light neutralinos, within the MSSM or N(n)MSSM, are smaller than for nu nubar production, even if light spin-0 particles are coupled to quarks and neutralinos. In a more general way, light dark matter particles are normally forbidden, unless they can annihilate sufficiently through a new interaction stronger than weak interactions (at lower energies), as induced by a light spin-1 U boson, or heavy-fermion exchanges in the case of scalar dark matter. We discuss the possible contributions of U-boson, heavy-fermion, or spin-0 exchanges to invisible psi and Upsilon decays. U-exchanges could lead, but not necessarily, to significant branching fractions for invisible decays into light dark matter. We show how one can get the correct relic density together with sufficiently small invisible branching fractions, and the resulting constraints on the U couplings to ordinary particles and dark matter, in particular |c_chi.f_bV| < 5 10^-3 from Upsilon decays, for 2 m_chi smaller than a few GeV. We also explain why there is no model-independent way to predict psi and Upsilon branching fractions into light dark matter, from dark matter annihilation cross sections at freeze-out time.Comment: 10 pages, 9 figures, to appear in Phys. Rev.