353 research outputs found

    Bispecial factors in circular non-pushy D0L languages

    Get PDF
    We study bispecial factors in fixed points of morphisms. In particular, we propose a simple method of how to find all bispecial words of non-pushy circular D0L-systems. This method can be formulated as an algorithm. Moreover, we prove that non-pushy circular D0L-systems are exactly those with finite critical exponent.Comment: 18 pages, 5 figure

    Outer billiard outside regular polygons

    Full text link
    We consider outer billiard outside regular convex polygons. We deal with the case of regular polygons with {3,4,5,6,10}\{3,4,5,6,10\} sides, and we describe the symbolic dynamics of the map and compute the complexity of the language.Comment: 53 pages, 12 figure

    Complexity and growth for polygonal billiards

    Get PDF
    We establish a relationship between the word complexity and the number of generalized diagonals for a polygonal billiard. We conclude that in the rational case the complexity function has cubic upper and lower bounds. In the tiling case the complexity has cubic asymptotic growth.Comment: 12 pages, 4 figure

    Cyclic Complexity of Words

    Get PDF
    We introduce and study a complexity function on words cx(n),c_x(n), called \emph{cyclic complexity}, which counts the number of conjugacy classes of factors of length nn of an infinite word x.x. We extend the well-known Morse-Hedlund theorem to the setting of cyclic complexity by showing that a word is ultimately periodic if and only if it has bounded cyclic complexity. Unlike most complexity functions, cyclic complexity distinguishes between Sturmian words of different slopes. We prove that if xx is a Sturmian word and yy is a word having the same cyclic complexity of x,x, then up to renaming letters, xx and yy have the same set of factors. In particular, yy is also Sturmian of slope equal to that of x.x. Since cx(n)=1c_x(n)=1 for some n1n\geq 1 implies xx is periodic, it is natural to consider the quantity lim infncx(n).\liminf_{n\rightarrow \infty} c_x(n). We show that if xx is a Sturmian word, then lim infncx(n)=2.\liminf_{n\rightarrow \infty} c_x(n)=2. We prove however that this is not a characterization of Sturmian words by exhibiting a restricted class of Toeplitz words, including the period-doubling word, which also verify this same condition on the limit infimum. In contrast we show that, for the Thue-Morse word tt, lim infnct(n)=+.\liminf_{n\rightarrow \infty} c_t(n)=+\infty.Comment: To appear in Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series
    corecore