Soil ecotoxicology: state of the art and future directions.

Abstract. Developments in soil ecotoxicology started with observations on pesticide effects on soil invertebrates in the 1960s. To support the risk assessment of chemicals, in the 1980s and 1990s development of toxicity tests was the main issue, including single species tests and also more realistic test systems like model ecosystems and field tests focusing on structural and functional endpoints. In the mean time, awareness grew about issues like bioavailability and routes of exposure, while biochemical endpoints (biomarkers) were proposed as sensitive and potential early-warning tools. In recent years, interactions between different chemicals (mixture toxicity) and between chemical and other stressors attracted scientific interest. With the development of molecular biology, omics tools are gaining increasing interest, while the ecological relevance of exposure and effects is translating into concepts like (chemical) stress ecology, ecological vulnerability and trait-based approaches. This contribution addresses historical developments and focuses on current issues in soil ecotoxicology. It is concluded that soil ecotoxicological risk assessment would benefit from extending the available battery of toxicity tests by including e.g. isopods, by paying more attention to exposure, bioavailability and toxicokinetics, and by developing more insight into the ecology of soil organisms to support better understanding of exposure and long-term consequences of chemical exposure at the individual, population and community level. Ecotoxicogenomics tools may also be helpful in this, but will require considerable further research before they can be applied in the practice of soil ecotoxicological risk assessment

Exploring DNA methylation patterns in copper exposed Folsomia candida and Enchytraeus crypticus

Accumulating evidence shows that epigenetics-mediated phenotypic plasticity plays a role in an organism’s ability to deal with environmental stress. However, to date, the role of epigenetic modifications in response to stress is hardly investigated in soil invertebrates. The main objective of this proof of principle study was to explore whether total cytosine and locus-specific CpG methylation are present in two important ecotoxicological model organisms, the springtail Folsomia candida and the potworm Enchytraeus crypticus, and if so, whether methylation patterns might change with increased toxicant exposure. LC-MS/MS analyses and bisulfite sequencing were performed to identify the CpG methylation state of the organisms. We show here, for the first time, a total level of 1.4% 5-methyl cytosine methylation in the genome of E. crypticus, and an absence of both total cytosine and locus-specific CpG methylation in F. candida. In E. crypticus, methylation of CpG sites was observed in the coding sequence (CDS) of the housekeeping gene Elongation Factor 1α, while the CDS of the stress inducible Heat Shock Protein 70 gene almost lacked methylation. This confirms previous observations that DNA methylation differs between housekeeping and stress-inducible genes in invertebrates. DNA methylation patterns in E. crypticus were not affected by exposure to copper (II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO4·5H2O) mixed in with LUFA 2.2 soil at sublethal effect concentrations that decreased reproduction by 10%, 20% and 50%. Although, differences in CpG methylation patterns between specific loci suggest a functional role for DNA methylation in E. crypticus, genome-wide bisulfite sequencing is needed to verify whether environmental stress affects this epigenetic hallmark

Neonicotinoids in bees: a review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment

Neonicotinoid insecticides are successfully applied to control pests in a variety of agricultural crops; however, they may not only affect pest insects but also non-target organisms such as pollinators. This review summarizes, for the first time, 15 years of research on the hazards of neonicotinoids to bees including honey bees, bumble bees and solitary bees. The focus of the paper is on three different key aspects determining the risks of neonicotinoid field concentrations for bee populations: (1) the environmental neonicotinoid residue levels in plants, bees and bee products in relation to pesticide application, (2) the reported side-effects with special attention for sublethal effects, and (3) the usefulness for the evaluation of neonicotinoids of an already existing risk assessment scheme for systemic compounds. Although environmental residue levels of neonicotinoids were found to be lower than acute/chronic toxicity levels, there is still a lack of reliable data as most analyses were conducted near the detection limit and for only few crops. Many laboratory studies described lethal and sublethal effects of neonicotinoids on the foraging behavior, and learning and memory abilities of bees, while no effects were observed in field studies at field-realistic dosages. The proposed risk assessment scheme for systemic compounds was shown to be applicable to assess the risk for side-effects of neonicotinoids as it considers the effect on different life stages and different levels of biological organization (organism versus colony). Future research studies should be conducted with field-realistic concentrations, relevant exposure and evaluation durations. Molecular markers may be used to improve risk assessment by a better understanding of the mode of action (interaction with receptors) of neonicotinoids in bees leading to the identification of environmentally safer compound

A metabolomic study on the responses of daphnia magna exposed to silver nitrate and coated silver nanoparticles

Conservation Biolog