16 research outputs found

    Early (Day −7) versus Conventional (Day −1) Inception of Cyclosporine-A for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis after Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children. Long-Term Results of an AIEOP Prospective, Randomized Study

    Get PDF
    We carried out a randomized, multicenter study comparing the inception of cyclosporine- A (CsA) on day –7 to conventional CsA (on day –1) to evaluate the influence of this modification on graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), treatment-related mortality (TRM), relapse rate (RR), and event-free survival (EFS) in children with hematologic malignancies given unrelated donor (UD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Between 1997 and 2002, 152 children transplanted for acute leukemia (102), myelodysplastic syndromes (23), chronic myelogenous leukemia (20), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (7) were enrolled in the study and randomized to receive either early CsA (group 1, N = 72) or conventional CsA (group 2, N = 80), after stratification according to HLA compatibility and disease phase. The cumulative incidence of both grade II-IV and grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), as well as of chronic GVHD (cGVHD), did not differ between the 2 groups. No significant differences were observed also with regard to TRM and RR. The 8-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of EFS were 56% in group 1, and 46% in group 2 (P = NS). In the Cox model, advanced disease phase, male recipient, older donor, and occurrence of grade III-IV aGVHD predicted inferior overall EFS. These data indicate that early inception of CsA does not improve posttransplantation outcome of children with hematologic malignancies given UD-HSCT

    Organizing national responses for rare blood disorders: The Italian experience with sickle cell disease in childhood

    No full text
    Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most frequent hemoglobinopathy worldwide but remains a rare blood disorder in most western countries. Recommendations for standard of care have been produced in the United States, the United Kingdom and France, where this disease is relatively frequent because of earlier immigration from Africa. These recommendations have changed the clinical course of SCD but can be difficult to apply in other contexts. The Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology Oncology (AIEOP) decided to develop a common national response to the rising number of SCD patients in Italy with the following objectives: 1) to create a national working group focused on pediatric SCD, and 2) to develop tailored guidelines for the management of SCD that could be accessed and practiced by those involved in the care of children with SCD in Italy. Methods: Guidelines, adapted to the Italian social context and health system, were developed by 22 pediatric hematologists representing 54 AIEOP centers across Italy. The group met five times for a total of 128 hours in 22 months; documents and opinions were circulated via web. Results: Recommendations regarding the prevention and treatment of the most relevant complications of SCD in childhood adapted to the Italian context and health system were produced. For each topic, a pathway of diagnosis and care is detailed, and a selection of health management issues crucial to Italy or different from other countries is described (i.e., use of alternatives for infection prophylaxis because of the lack of oral penicillin in Italy). Conclusions: Creating a network of physicians involved in the day-to-day care of children with SCD is feasible in a country where it remains rare. Providing hematologists, primary and secondary care physicians, and caregivers across the country with web-based guidelines for the management of SCD tailored to the Italian context is the first step in building a sustainable response to a rare but emerging childhood blood disorder and in implementing the World Health Organization’s suggestion “to design (and) implement ... comprehensive national integrated programs for the prevention and management of SCD

    Treatment and long-term results in children with acute myeloid leukaemia treated according to the AIEOP AML protocols

    No full text
    Since 1982, four consecutive studies on childhood acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) (namely LAM-82, -87, -87M and -92) have been conducted in Italy by the Associazione Italiana di Ematologia e Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP) group. The induction therapy of the first three studies consisted of daunorubicin and cytarabine structured in a 3+7 backbone. In the most recent protocol (LAM92), patients received two induction courses including idarubicin, cytarabine and etoposide. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia (20% of diagnoses) were included in LAM-87 and 87M studies. Postremissional therapy significantly changed over time, with an ever-increasing role given to stem cell transplantation (SCT). The long-term outcome of patients enrolled in the LAM-82, 87 and 87M studies was comparable, whereas that of children treated according to LAM-92 study was significantly better (P<0.005). Either allogeneic or autologous SCT was employed as consolidation therapy in more than 75% of cases enrolled in this latter study. Patients enrolled in the LAM-92 study were stratified in standard and high-risk groups with different outcome (67 vs 47%, respectively, P=0.04). Altogether, the results obtained in these four studies have permitted a progressive refinement of treatment, contributing to the structure of the ongoing LAM-2002 protocol that stratifies patients according to the presence of definite genetic anomalies and response to induction therap
    corecore