1,176 research outputs found

    The ā€˜Teaching - Researchā€™ nexus in medical education

    Get PDF
    Research forms an important part of the academic competencies attained during academic study.For medical students, this includes learning how to critically appraise and interpret medical and widerhealth care research, particularly ā€“ but not only ā€“ when relevant for oneĀ»s own current or future practice.It also includes understanding the core principles of different methods and research ethics and learningto participate in research. The teaching ā€“ research nexus: strategies to implement research education in the medical curriculum. In this paper, we offer reflections on how to do this on the basis of professional anecdotal experiences by a general educationalist with a particular interest in medical education; an undergraduate medical student with a research-focussed, stand-alone additional degree, and a medical academic.Our paper initially explores the need for research education; tying in HealeyĀ»s theoretical frameworkin student research, and the nature of providing evidence-based patient care. The paper then presents areport on a student research programme at the University of Birmingham, England.Teaching and Teacher Learning (ICLON

    Microdosing and other phase 0 clinical trials: facilitating translation in Drug Development

    Get PDF
    Increasing costs of drug development and ethical concernsabout the risks of exposing humans and animals to novelchemical entities favor limited exposure clinical trials suchas microdosing and other phase 0 trials. An increasing bodyof research supports the validity of extrapolation from thelimited drug exposure of phase 0 approaches to the full,therapeutic exposure. An increasing number of applicationsand design options demonstrate the versatility and exibilitythese approaches offer to drug developers

    The effect of distant reiki on pain in women after elective Caesarean section: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Approximately 25% of all babies in North America are delivered via Caesarean section (C-section). Though a common surgical procedure, C-section recovery can be painful. Opioids, specifically codeine, are commonly used to ease pain; however, its active metabolite, morphine, passes into breast milk, and may produce unwanted side effects in neonates; therefore, alternatives to opioids are being sought. Reiki is an ancient Japanese form of healing where practitioners transfer healing energy through light touch and positive healing intention. Although 1.2 million Americans use reiki to reduce pain or depression, there is a lack of strong evidence supporting its effectiveness. A recent systematic review showed existing studies to be of poor methodological quality, with the common limitation of lack of blinding. To overcome this issue, the authors used distant reiki to assess its effectiveness in reducing pain following an elective C-section. Methods: In this randomised, double-blinded study, women who underwent an elective C-section were allocated to either usual care (control, n=40) or three distant reiki sessions in addition to usual care (n=40). Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The primary endpoint was the Area Under the VAS-Time Curve (AUC) for days 1-3. Secondary measures included: The proportion of women who required opioid medications and dose consumed, rate of healing and vital signs. Results: AUC for pain was not significantly different in the distant reiki and control groups (meanĀ±SD; 212.16104.7 vs 223.16117.8; p=0.96). There were no significant differences in opioid consumption or rate of healing; however, the distant reiki group had a significantly lower heart rate (74.368.1 bpm vs 79.867.9 bpm, p=0.003) an

    The status of paediatric medicines initiatives around the world-what has happened and what has not?

    Get PDF
    Purpose: This review was conducted to examine the current status of paediatric medicines initiatives across the globe. Methods: The authors made a non-systematic descriptive review of current world situation. Results: Two regions, the United States (US) and the European Union (EU), and the World Health Organization (WHO) have introduced strong paediatric initiatives to improve children's health through improving access to better paediatric medicines. The experience from the US initiative indicates that it is possible to stimulate development and study of paediatric medicines and provide important new information for improvement of paediatric therapy. The early results from the EU initiative are similarly encouraging. In Canada, Japan, Australia and other developed countries, specific paediatric medicines initiatives have been less extensive and weaker, with modest results. Disappointingly, current evidence suggests that results from clinical trials outside the US often do not benefit children in the country in which the trials were largely conducted. Pharmaceutical companies that have derived a financial benefit commensurate with the cost of doing the paediatric trials in one country do not seem to be making the results of these trials available to all countries if there is no financial incentive to the company. The WHO campaign 'make medicines child size' has produced substantive accomplishments in building improved foundations to improve mechanisms that will enhance children's access to critical medicines in resource-limited settings. However, practically all of this work has been performed using an amalgamation of short-term funding from a variety of sources as opposed to a sustained, programmatic commitment. Conclusions: Although much still needs to be done, it's clear that with concerted efforts and appropriate resources, change is possible but slow. Retaining and fostering public and political interest in paediatric medicines is challenging, but pivotal for success.Fil: Hoppu, Kalle. Helsinki University Central Hospital; FinlandiaFil: Anabwani, Gabriel. Botswana-Baylor Childrenā€™s Clinical Centre of Excellence; BotsuanaFil: Garcia Bournissen, Facundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĆ­ficas y TĆ©cnicas; Argentina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital General de NiƱos "Ricardo GutiĆ©rrez"; ArgentinaFil: Gazarian, Madlen. University of New South Wales; Australia. Sydney Childrenā€™s Hospital; AustraliaFil: Kearns, Gregory L.. The Childrenā€™s Mercy Hospital; Estados Unidos. University of Missouri; Estados UnidosFil: Nakamura, Hidefumi. National Center for Child Health and Development; JapĆ³nFil: Peterson, Robert G.. University of British Columbia; CanadĆ”Fil: Sri Ranganathan, Shalini. University Of Colombo. Faculty Of Medicine; Sri LankaFil: De Wildt, Saskia N.. Sophia Childrenā€™s Hospital; PaĆ­ses Bajo

    Daily interruption of sedation in critically ill children:study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: In adult patients who are critically ill and mechanically ventilated, daily interruption of sedation (DSI) is an effective method of improving sedation management, resulting in a decrease of the duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and the length of stay in the hospital. It is a safe and effective approach and is common practice in adult ICUs. For critically ill children it is unknown if DSI is effective and feasible. The aim of this multicenter randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of daily sedation interruption in critically ill children. METHODS/DESIGN: Children between 0 and 18Ā years of age who require mechanical ventilation, with an expected duration of at least 48Ā h and need for sedative infusion, will be included. After enrollment patients will be randomly assigned to DSI in combination with protocolized sedation (intervention group) or protocolized continuous sedation (control group). A sedation protocol that contains an algorithm for increasing and weaning of sedatives and analgesics will be used. The sedative infusion will be restarted if the patient becomes uncomfortable or agitated according to the sedation protocol. The primary endpoint is the number of ventilator-free days at 28Ā days. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR203
    • ā€¦
    corecore