83 research outputs found

    Literatur im Museum: Gerhard Rühm lädt zum Mitmachen ein

    Get PDF
    Das Bank Austria Kunstforum Wien zeigte mit der Ausstellung "Gerhard Rühm" im Herbst 2017 einen Universalkünstler der zwischen allen Medien und Kunstformen changiert. Sein vielschichtiges Oevre bietet sich wunderbar an, um Literatur und Sprache im Museum erlebbar zu machen. Die Autorinnen bringen uns drei sehr unterschiedliche Beispiele aus ihrer Literaturvermittlungsarbeit im Ausstellungs-Kontext

    Size effect on shear strength of FRP reinforced concrete beams

    Get PDF
    yesThis paper presents test results of six concrete beams reinforced with longitudinal carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) bars and without vertical shear reinforcement. All beams were tested under a two-point loading system to investigate shear behavior of CFRP reinforced concrete beams. Beam depth and amount of CFRP reinforcement were the main parameters investigated. All beams failed due to a sudden diagonal shear crack at almost 45°. A simplified, empirical expression for the shear capacity of FRP reinforced concrete members accounting for most influential parameters is developed based on the design-by-testing approach using a large database of 134 specimens collected from the literature including the beams tested in this study. The equations of six existing design standards for shear capacity of FRP reinforced concrete beams have also been evaluated using the large database collected. The existing shear design methods for FRP reinforced concrete beams give either conservative or unsafe predictions for many specimens in the database and their accuracy are mostly dependent on the effective depth and type of FRP reinforcement. On the other hand, the proposed equation provides reasonably accurate shear capacity predictions for a wide range of FRP reinforced concrete beams

    Ziegel aus Wien

    No full text

    Composite Profiled Slabs and Profiled Decking

    No full text

    Reliability of Seismic Performance Assessments for Individual Buildings and Portfolios

    No full text
    Seismic performance and loss assessments are required in areas of Insurance, Finance and Public Policy. Providers are Structural Engineers and Risk Management Firms. There are no current procedures to evaluate the epistemic and aleatory uncertainties for such assessments. The essential issue is whether or not there is sufficient reliability in the result to use the result as the basis for risk management decisions and actions. For a single building this may be whether or not a prescribed earthquake performance level is met, life safety or if a portfolio’s vulnerability level is acceptable, whether the. loss for a given time period is less than a stated value. A method based in part on Federal Emergency Management Agency P-695, is developed for evaluating the reliability of performance and/or loss assessments for both individual and portfolios of buildings. Consideration is given to how well the building investigation and corresponding evaluation process have been performed, the qualifications of the person(s) doing the assessment, the thoroughness of the building evaluation, the technical validity of the assessment procedure or model and what computational reliabilities are presented. The method characterizes the uncertainty of each component of the assessment procedure for each building by qualitative determined assignments. The resulting reliability measure is likely to be most useful for determining whether/or not a building has acceptable life safety performance, or if a portfolio has an acceptably low loss risk over a given period of time. In both cases, the reliability must either be sufficient to warrant action, or serve to indicate need for improved assessment
    corecore