Water quality monitoring in the former Soviet Union and the Russian Federation : Assessment of analytical methods

Monitoring of surface water quality in the former Soviet Union (FSU) and the present-day Russian Federation historically held an important place in the hierarchy of science, legal framework and relations between agencies. Sadly, the gap between the intentions, qualification of managers and effective programmes has always been sizeable. Since disintegration of the FSU this gap has become a formidable barrier for collecting reliable monitoring information and producing effective water quality management decisions in the Russian Federation. Updating the federal system for freshwater quality monitoring in the Russian Federation is complicated by several unresolved problems. The principal issues are political, technical, institutional and financial. The existing Russian model of water chemistry data collection inherited from the FSU has proved unreliable, outdated and unrelated to modern national issues of water management. The quality of produced data is one of the greatest weaknesses of the federal monitoring system both in the Russian Federation and in other states of the FSU. A significant cause of the low reliability of the produced information is the analytical methods used in monitoring, their inappropriate use, non-compliance to laboratory practices when following expert recommendations, insufficient training level of managers and laboratory personnel and under-funding of the federal monitoring system. The growing national priorities in the field of surface water quality control and improvement conflict with the capacity of the Russian Federation to provide necessary information of guaranteed high quality. Here we make the first attempt to present a critical analysis of the analytical methods used to assess and control surface water quality, to show the main errors arising when applying the recommended analytical methods, and to assess the degree of reliability of produced monitoring information from 1977-1978 and to the present. Our overall objective is to summarize the current situation in order to facilitate implementation of future improvements

Particulate organic carbon and nitrogen export from major Arctic rivers

Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2016. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Global Biogeochemical Cycles 30 (2016): 629–643, doi:10.1002/2015GB005351.Northern rivers connect a land area of approximately 20.5 million km2 to the Arctic Ocean and surrounding seas. These rivers account for ~10% of global river discharge and transport massive quantities of dissolved and particulate materials that reflect watershed sources and impact biogeochemical cycling in the ocean. In this paper, multiyear data sets from a coordinated sampling program are used to characterize particulate organic carbon (POC) and particulate nitrogen (PN) export from the six largest rivers within the pan-Arctic watershed (Yenisey, Lena, Ob', Mackenzie, Yukon, Kolyma). Together, these rivers export an average of 3055 × 109 g of POC and 368 × 109 g of PN each year. Scaled up to the pan-Arctic watershed as a whole, fluvial export estimates increase to 5767 × 109 g and 695 × 109 g of POC and PN per year, respectively. POC export is substantially lower than dissolved organic carbon export by these rivers, whereas PN export is roughly equal to dissolved nitrogen export. Seasonal patterns in concentrations and source/composition indicators (C:N, δ13C, Δ14C, δ15N) are broadly similar among rivers, but distinct regional differences are also evident. For example, average radiocarbon ages of POC range from ~2000 (Ob') to ~5500 (Mackenzie) years before present. Rapid changes within the Arctic system as a consequence of global warming make it challenging to establish a contemporary baseline of fluvial export, but the results presented in this paper capture variability and quantify average conditions for nearly a decade at the beginning of the 21st century.National Science Foundation Grant Numbers: 0229302, 0732985; U.S. Geological Survey; Department of Indian and Northern Affairs2016-11-1

Seasonal and annual fluxes of nutrients and organic matter from large rivers to the Arctic Ocean and surrounding seas

Author Posting. © The Author(s), 2011. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Springer for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Estuaries and Coasts 35 (2012): 369-382, doi:10.1007/s12237-011-9386-6.River inputs of nutrients and organic matter impact the biogeochemistry of arctic estuaries and the Arctic Ocean as a whole, yet there is considerable uncertainty about the magnitude of fluvial fluxes at the pan-arctic scale. Samples from the six largest arctic rivers, with a combined watershed area of 11.3 x 106 km2, have revealed strong seasonal variations in constituent concentrations and fluxes within rivers as well as large differences among the rivers. Specifically, we investigate fluxes of dissolved organic carbon, dissolved organic nitrogen, total dissolved phosphorus, dissolved inorganic nitrogen, nitrate, and silica. This is the first time that seasonal and annual constituent fluxes have been determined using consistent sampling and analytical methods at the pan arctic scale, and consequently provide the best available estimates for constituent flux from land to the Arctic Ocean and surrounding seas. Given the large inputs of river water to the relatively small Arctic Ocean, and the dramatic impacts that climate change is having in the Arctic, it is particularly urgent that we establish the contemporary river fluxes so that we will be able to detect future changes and evaluate the impact of the changes on the biogeochemistry of the receiving coastal and ocean systems.This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through grants OPP-0229302, OPP-0519840, OPP-0732522, and OPP-0732944. Additional support was provided by the U. S. Geological Survey (Yukon River) and the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs (Mackenzie River)

Additional records of the bivalves Mytilopsis leucophaeata (Conrad, 1831) (Dreissenidae) and Arcuatula senhousia (Benson, 1842) (Mytilidae) in the Ponto-Caspian region

Contains fulltext : 231399.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Nutrient chemistry of the Ob\u27 and Yenisey Rivers, Siberia: results from June 2000 expedition and evaluation of long-term data sets

Although containing only ∼1% of global ocean volume, the arctic Ocean receives almost 10% of global river discharge. Nutrients carried by arctic rivers influence the productivity of their estuaries and coastal seas and may serve as important indicators of changing conditions in their watersheds. The three largest arctic rivers (Yenisey, Ob\u27, and Lena) enter the arctic Ocean from Siberia and together account for nearly 35% of river-water inputs to the arctic Ocean. Although several nutrient flux estimates have been published for Eurasian arctic rivers, recent publications have highlighted uncertainties in these estimates and have cautioned against their uncritical use, particularly with respect to ammonium data. In order to help clarify the situation and evaluate the validity of existing long-term data sets, we went to Siberia during June 2000 to collect and analyze new nutrient samples from the downstream reaches of the Yenisey and Ob\u27 rivers. Samples were independently analyzed by as many as four groups/laboratories in order to maximize confidence in analytical results. Whereas long-term data sets report average ammonium concentrations of 710 and 360 μg N/l in the Ob\u27 and Yenisey rivers, respectively, we measured concentrations of only 10–15 μg N/l in both rivers in June 2000. We conclude that existing long-term data sets for these two rivers are grossly in error with respect to ammonium concentrations, and by extension that other surprisingly high values of ammonium reported for Russian arctic rivers (for example Pur, Taz, Nadym, and Pechora rivers) must be considered extremely doubtful. The situation is better for nitrate and phosphate, but our one-time sampling is insufficient to fully evaluate the reliability of existing data sets for these nutrients. Because a substantial percentage of the total freshwater input to the arctic Ocean comes from Russian rivers, the large revisions in ammonium concentrations needed for the Ob\u27, Yenisey, and probably other Eurasian arctic rivers will significantly reduce estimates of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) fluxes to the arctic Ocean as a whole

Increasing Alkalinity Export from Large Russian Arctic Rivers

Riverine carbonate alkalinity (HCO₃^– and CO₃^2–) sourced from chemical weathering represents a significant sink for atmospheric CO₂. Alkalinity flux from Arctic rivers is partly determined by precipitation, permafrost extent, groundwater flow paths, and surface vegetation, all of which are changing under a warming climate. Here we show that over the past three and half decades, the export of alkalinity from the Yenisei and Ob’ Rivers increased from 225 to 642 Geq yr^–1 (+185%) and from 201 to 470 Geq yr^–1 (+134%); an average rate of 11.90 and 7.28 Geq yr^–1, respectively. These increases may have resulted from a suite of changes related to climate change and anthropogenic activity, including higher temperatures, increased precipitation, permafrost thaw, changes to hydrologic flow paths, shifts in vegetation, and decreased acid deposition. Regardless of the direct causes, these trends have broad implications for the rate of carbon sequestration on land and delivery of buffering capacity to freshwater ecosystems and the Arctic Ocean

Increasing Alkalinity Export from Large Russian Arctic Rivers

Riverine carbonate alkalinity (HCO₃^– and CO₃^2–) sourced from chemical weathering represents a significant sink for atmospheric CO₂. Alkalinity flux from Arctic rivers is partly determined by precipitation, permafrost extent, groundwater flow paths, and surface vegetation, all of which are changing under a warming climate. Here we show that over the past three and half decades, the export of alkalinity from the Yenisei and Ob’ Rivers increased from 225 to 642 Geq yr^–1 (+185%) and from 201 to 470 Geq yr^–1 (+134%); an average rate of 11.90 and 7.28 Geq yr^–1, respectively. These increases may have resulted from a suite of changes related to climate change and anthropogenic activity, including higher temperatures, increased precipitation, permafrost thaw, changes to hydrologic flow paths, shifts in vegetation, and decreased acid deposition. Regardless of the direct causes, these trends have broad implications for the rate of carbon sequestration on land and delivery of buffering capacity to freshwater ecosystems and the Arctic Ocean