46 research outputs found

    Effect of consanguinity on birth weight for gestational age in a developing country.

    No full text
    Consanguinity, the marriage between relatives, has been associated with adverse child health outcomes because it increases homozygosity of recessive alleles. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of consanguinity on the birth weight of newborns in Greater Beirut, Lebanon. Cross-sectional data were collected on 10,289 consecutive liveborn singleton newborns admitted to eight hospitals belonging to the National Collaborative Perinatal Neonatal Network during the years 2000 and 2001. Birth weight was modeled by use of the fetal growth ratio, defined as the ratio of the observed birth weight to the median birth weight for gestational age. A mixed-effect multiple linear regression model was used to predict the net effect of first- and second-cousin marriage on the birth weight for gestational age, accounting for within-hospital clustering of data. After controlling for medical and sociodemographic covariates, the authors found a statistically significant negative association between consanguinity and birth weight at each gestational age. No significant difference was observed in the decrease in birth weight between the first- and second-cousin marriages. Overall, consanguinity was associated with a decrease in birth weight for gestational age by 1.8% (beta = -0.018, 95% confidence interval: -0.027, -0.008). The largest effects on fetal growth were seen with lower parity and smoking during pregnancy

    Predictors of breast-feeding in a developing country: results of a prospective cohort study.

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: Data on the prevalence and predictors of breast-feeding remain scarce in Lebanon. Moreover, no study has previously addressed the effect of the paediatrician's sex on breast-feeding. The present study aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of breast-feeding at 1 and 4 months of infant age while exploring the potential role of the sex of the paediatrician. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. Predictors of breast-feeding significant at the bivariate level were tested at 1 and 4 months through two stepwise regression models. SETTING: Infants were enrolled through the clinics and dispensaries of 117 paediatricians located in Beirut, Lebanon, and its suburbs. SUBJECTS: A total of 1,320 healthy newborn infants born between August 2001 and February 2002 were prospectively followed during the first year. FINDINGS: Breast-feeding rates at 1 and 4 months were 56.3 % and 24.7 %, respectively. Early discharge, high parity and religion were significantly associated with higher breast-feeding rates at 1 and 4 months of age. Maternal age proved significant only at 1 month, while maternal working status and sex of the paediatrician were significant at 4 months. A novel finding of our study was the positive effect of female paediatricians on breast-feeding continuation until 4 months of age (OR = 1.49; 95 % CI 1.03, 2.15). CONCLUSIONS: Breast-feeding rates are low at 1 and 4 months of infant age in Beirut. Further research to investigate the interactions between female physicians and lactating mothers in maintaining breast-feeding in other populations is warranted. The results constitute the basis for designing interventions targeting policy makers, health professionals and mothers

    The pivotal role of clinical ethics consults in critical clinical decision making in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit within an Arab culture

    Get PDF
    Medical Ethics is a relatively new field in developing countries and, to date, Lebanon is the only Arab country that offers bedside ethics consults; however, this is limited to a single medical center, the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC). The clinical ethicist running the bedside clinical ethics service was trained in the United States and the United Kingdom. However, once she began practicing in Lebanon, she realized that much of what she learned in terms of theory and practice as well as navigating ethical issues did not apply to the local context. Rather, much needed to be sifted and adapted to a different culture, social decorum, and mentality. This is more evident when working with patients in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), where parents coming from various areas in the region bring in their unique values and beliefs. The admission of a premature newborn to the NICU is often a strenuous experience for parents and a challenge for healthcare providers. Ethical conundrums often arise when there is a potential partial success with a plan of treatment(s). For example, from an ethical point of view resuscitation is less problematic than surviving severe illness with brain damage, and thus controversial issues linked to quality of life surface as living in a vegetative or incapacitated state can be deemed worse than death. In this article, we present our own experience as neonatologists and clinical ethics consultant (CEC) teaming up at the AUBMC’s NICU in an attempt at navigating the muddy waters of decision-making and ethical controversies within an Arab culture characterized with specificities that are often neglected and thus might negatively impact the decision regarding the right plan of treatment. The aim is trying to come up with a recommendation that is in the best interest of the infant and his/her parents and in an attempt to ensure that parents understand the importance of them being part of the decision-making process

    Correlation between Group B Streptococcal Genotypes, Their Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, and Virulence Genes among Pregnant Women in Lebanon

    Get PDF
    The antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 76 Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococci [GBS]) isolates from vaginal specimens of pregnant women near term were correlated to their genotypes generated by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA analysis and their virulence factors encoding genes cylE, lmb, scpB, rib, and bca by PCR. Based on the distribution of the susceptibility patterns, six profiles were generated. RAPD analysis detected 7 clusters of genotypes. The cylE gene was present in 99% of the isolates, the lmb in 96%, scpB in 94.7%, rib in 33%, and bca in 56.5% of isolates. The isolates demonstrated a significant correlation between antimicrobial resistance and genotype clusters denoting the distribution of particular clones with different antimicrobial resistance profiles, entailing the practice of caution in therapeutic options. All virulence factors encoding genes were detected in all seven genotypic clusters with rib and bca not coexisting in the same genome

    Incidence and outcomes of uterine rupture among women with prior caesarean section: WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health

    Get PDF
    Caesarean section (CS) is increasing globally, and women with prior CS are at higher risk of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies. However, little is known about the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of uterine rupture in women with prior CS, especially in developing countries. To investigate this, we conducted a secondary analysis of the World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health, which included data on delivery from 359 facilities in 29 countries. The incidence of uterine rupture among women with at least one prior CS was 0.5% (170/37,366), ranging from 0.2% in high-Human Development Index (HDI) countries to 1.0% in low-HDI countries. Factors significantly associated with uterine rupture included giving birth in medium-or low-HDI countries (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.0 and 3.88, respectively), lower maternal educational level (<= 6 years) (AOR 1.71), spontaneous onset of labour (AOR 1.62), and gestational age at birth < 37 weeks (AOR 3.52). Women with uterine rupture had significantly higher risk of maternal death (AOR 4.45) and perinatal death (AOR 33.34). Women with prior CS, especially in resource-limited settings, are facing higher risk of uterine rupture and subsequent adverse outcomes. Further studies are needed for prevention/management strategies in these settings.UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)World Health Organization (WHO)United States Agency for International Development (USAID)Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of JapanGynuity Health ProjectsJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMEDNatl Res Inst Child Hlth & Dev, Dept Allergy & Clin Immunol, Tokyo, JapanUniv Tsukuba, Dept Global Hlth Nursing, Fac Med, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, JapanNatl Ctr Child Hlth & Dev, Dept Educ Clin Res, Tokyo, JapanSt Lukes Int Univ, Grad Sch Nursing Sci, Global Hlth Nursing, Tokyo, JapanWHO, UNDP UNFPA UNICEF WHO World Bank Special Programm, Dept Reprod Hlth & Res, Geneva, SwitzerlandUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Evidence Based Healthcare Postgrad Programme, Dept Internal Med, Sao Paulo, BrazilMinist Hlth, Family Hlth Bur, Maternal & Child Morbid & Mortal Unit, Colombo, Sri LankaSora No Mori Clin, Yaese, Okinawa, JapanFortis Mem Res Inst, Obstet & Gynecol, Gurgaon, IndiaNatl Ctr Dis Prevent & Control, Dept Hlth, Manila, PhilippinesKochi Univ, Kochi Med Sch, Dept Pediat, Kochi, JapanUniv Abdou Moumouni Niamey, Niamey, NigerAmer Univ Beirut, Beirut, LebanonUniv Nairobi, Obstet & Gynaecol, Sch Med, Nairobi, KenyaUniv Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Med Sch, Dept Social Med, Sao Paulo, BrazilNatl Ctr Child Hlth & Dev, Dept Hlth Policy, Tokyo, JapanUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Evidence Based Healthcare Postgrad Programme, Dept Internal Med, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc

    Antenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of imminent preterm birth in low-resource countries: the case for equipoise and the need for efficacy trials

    Get PDF
    The scientific basis for antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) for women at risk of preterm birth has rapidly changed in recent years. Two landmark trials—the Antenatal Corticosteroid Trial and the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids Trial—have challenged the long-held assumptions on the comparative health benefits and harms regarding the use of ACS for preterm birth across all levels of care and contexts, including resource-limited settings. Researchers, clinicians, programme managers, policymakers and donors working in low-income and middle-income countries now face challenging questions of whether, where and how ACS can be used to optimise outcomes for both women and preterm newborns. In this article, we briefly present an appraisal of the current evidence around ACS, how these findings informed WHO’s current recommendations on ACS use, and the knowledge gaps that have emerged in the light of new trial evidence. Critical considerations in the generalisability of the available evidence demonstrate that a true state of clinical equipoise exists for this treatment option in low-resource settings. An expert group convened by WHO concluded that there is a clear need for more efficacy trials of ACS in these settings to inform clinical practice

    Global research priorities related to the World Health Organization Labour Care Guide: results of a global consultation

    Get PDF
    Background The World Health Organization (WHO) published the WHO Labour Care Guide (LCG) in 2020 to support the implementation of its 2018 recommendations on intrapartum care. The WHO LCG promotes evidence-based labour monitoring and stimulates shared decision-making between maternity care providers and labouring women. There is a need to identify critical questions that will contribute to defining the research agenda relating to implementation of the WHO LCG. Methods This mixed-methods prioritization exercise, adapted from the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) and James Lind Alliance (JLA) methods, combined a metrics-based design with a qualitative, consensusbuilding consultation in three phases. The exercise followed the reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE). First, 30 stakeholders were invited to submit online ideas or questions (generation of research ideas). Then, 220 stakeholders were invited to score "research avenues" (i.e., broad research ideas that could be answered through a set of research questions) against six independent and equally weighted criteria (scoring of research avenues). Finally, a technical working group (TWG) of 20 purposively selected stakeholders reviewed the scoring, and refined and ranked the research avenues (consensus-building meeting). Results Initially, 24 stakeholders submitted 89 research ideas or questions. A list of 10 consolidated research avenues was scored by 75/220 stakeholders. During the virtual consensus-building meeting, research avenues were refined, and the top three priorities agreed upon were: (1) optimize implementation strategies of WHO LCG, (2) improve understanding of the effect of WHO LCG on maternal and perinatal outcomes, and the process and experience of labour and childbirth care, and (3) assess the effect of the WHO LCG in special situations or settings. Research avenues related to the organization of care and resource utilization ranked lowest during both the scoring and consensusbuilding process. Conclusion This systematic and transparent process should encourage researchers, program implementers, and funders to support research aligned with the identified priorities related to WHO LCG. An international collaborative platform is recommended to implement prioritized research by using harmonized research tools, establishing a repository of research priorities studies, and scaling-up successful research results
    corecore