the impact of delayed treatment on 6 minute walk distance test in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension a meta analysis

Abstract Background The impact of treatment delay in stable patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains unaddressed. Methods This meta-analysis included six datasets of PAH therapies with randomized-controlled trials (RCT) and corresponding open-label extension (OLE) studies. We evaluated the change in 6MWD at 1year in the OLE studies by active treatment versus ex-placebo group. The ex-placebo group (i.e., the patients randomized to placebo in the RCT and ultimately treated with active therapy in the OLE) represented the "delay-in-treatment" population. Results Patients with a treatment delay of 12–16weeks in PAH targeted therapy had an improvement in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) test at 1year, but this improvement did not amount to the same degree of improvement as their initially treated counterparts. The difference in 6MWD was 15m to 20m at 1year. Conclusion A short-term delay in PAH targeted therapy may adversely affect functional capacity in patients with PAH. This meta-analysis provides some insight as to whether earlier treatment would benefit stable patients with PAH

Ralinepag Phase II Open-Label Extension Study in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: Ralinepag is a potent, titratable, orally administered prostacyclin (IP) receptor agonist to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension. A phase II randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 22-week study of immediate-release (IR) ralinepag safety and efficacy met its primary endpoint, significantly reducing pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) compared with placebo. This phase II open-label extension (OLE) study assessed long-term safety and tolerability of ralinepag. METHODS: Participants were eligible for the OLE if they completed the parent study or experienced a clinical worsening event while receiving placebo. Those previously receiving IR ralinepag remained on their current dose, and participants formerly administered placebo were titrated to the highest tolerated dose. Participants were transitioned to an extended-release ralinepag formulation toward the end of the OLE. The primary objective evaluated long-term safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints included changes in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), World Health Organization/New York Heart Association functional class, clinical worsening, and hemodynamic measures. RESULTS: In total, 45/61 participants enrolled in the OLE study, 30 from the IR ralinepag group and 15 from the placebo group. The most common adverse events (AEs) were known prostacyclin-related effects (e.g., headache, 64.4%; diarrhea, 37.8%; jaw pain, 33.3%). There was a notable decline in AEs after reaching and maintaining a stable dose. At month 24 after entering the OLE, 6MWD significantly increased by a mean of 36.3 m (P = 0.004) from OLE baseline, and most participants remained stable in their functional class (84.8%). Post-baseline PVR in 1 or 2 years decreased by a median of 52.2 dyn.s/cm5 and mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased by a median of 2.0 mmHg (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Ralinepag produced sustained, durable improvements in 6MWD along with durable reductions in PVR and a manageable AE profile. Most participants continuing treatment with ralinepag maintained functional measures throughout the OLE and those switching from placebo to ralinepag often experienced functional improvements

Contemporary risk scores predict clinical worsening in pulmonary arterial hypertension - An analysis of FREEDOM-EV

BACKGROUND: Risk scores integrate clinical variables emphasizing symptoms, exercise capacity, and measures of cardiac strain to predict clinical outcome better than any single value in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Risk scores have demonstrated prognostic utility for outcomes in registries, and recent studies have suggested that they are also therapy-responsive in controlled trials. METHODS: FREEDOM-EV, a global, placebo-controlled, event-driven study, randomized 690 PAH participants 1:1 to oral treprostinil (TRE) or placebo. Clinical assessments were performed every 12 weeks to calculate the non-invasive French risk assessment (FRA), 4-strata COMPERA, REVEAL 2.0, and REVEAL Lite 2; median follow-up was 58 weeks. The Week 12 risk scores were used to predict time to clinical worsening (from Week 12) with Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates. Log-rank test was used to calculate the statistical difference among risk categories, and mediation analysis tested the hypothesis that improvements in risk score contributed to reduced likelihood for clinical worsening. We assessed the previously proposed net clinical benefit (achievement of FRA low-risk status and absence of clinical worsening). RESULTS: Both REVEAL scores, COMPERA, and FRA at Week 12 predicted subsequent clinical worsening better than baseline risk. Mediation analysis demonstrated that Week 12 risk score reduction explained part of TRE\u27s effect on clinical worsening, especially for those with higher baseline risk. TRE assigned participants were more likely to achieve the previously proposed net clinical benefit at Weeks 24 and beyond. Few participants who achieved \u27net clinical benefit\u27 had subsequent clinical worsening. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary risk scores were therapy responsive in FREEDOM-EV and early improvements predicted subsequent outcomes. This post hoc analysis suggests that risk scores may be a surrogate for clinical worsening