On 3-colorable plane graphs without 5- and 7-cycles

AbstractIn this note, it is proved that every plane graph without 5- and 7-cycles and without adjacent triangles is 3-colorable. This improves the result of [O.V. Borodin, A.N. Glebov, A. Raspaud, M.R. Salavatipour, Planar graphs without cycles of length from 4 to 7 are 3-colorable, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 93 (2005) 303–311], and offers a partial solution for a conjecture of Borodin and Raspaud [O.V. Borodin, A. Raspaud, A sufficient condition for planar graphs to be 3-colorable, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 88 (2003) 17–27]

An analogue of Dirac’s theorem on circular super-critical graphs

AbstractA graph G is called circular super-critical if χc(G∖u)<χc(G)−1 for every vertex u of G. In this paper, analogous to a result of Dirac on chromatic critical graphs, a sharp lower bound on the vertex degree of circular super-critical graphs is proved. This lower bound provides a partial answer to a question of X. Zhu [The circular chromatic number of induced subgraphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 92 (2004) 177–181]. Some other structural properties of circular super-critical graphs are also presented

Structure and coloring of (P7P_7, C5C_5, diamond)-free graphs

We use $P_t$ and $C_t$ to denote a path and a cycle on t vertices, respectively. A diamond consists of two triangles that share exactly one edge, a kite is a graph obtained from a diamond by adding a new vertex adjacent to a vertex of degree 2 of the diamond, a paraglider is the graph that consists of a $C_4$ plus a vertex adjacent to three vertices of the $C_4$, a paw is a graph obtained from a triangle by adding a pendant edge. A comparable pair $(u, v)$ consists of two nonadjacent vertices $u$ and $v$ such that $N(u)\subseteq N(v)$ or $N(v)\subseteq N(u)$. A universal clique is a clique $K$ such that $xy \in E(G)$ for any two vertices $x \in K$ and $y\in V (G)\setminus K$. A blowup of a graph H is a graph obtained by substituting a stable set for each vertex, and correspondingly replacing each edge by a complete bipartite graph. We prove that 1) there is a unique connected imperfect $(P_7, C_5$, kite, paraglider)-free graph G with \delta(G) \geq \omega(G)+ 1 which has no clique cutsets, no comparable pairs, and no universal cliques; 2) if G is a connected imperfect $(P_7, C_5$, diamond)-free graph with \delta(G) \geq max{3, \omega(G)} and without comparable pairs, then G is isomorphic to a graph of a well defined 12 graph families; and 3) each connected imperfect $(P_7, C_5$, paw)-free graph is a blowup of $C_7$. As consequences, we show that \chi(G) \leq \omega(G)+1 if G is (P7, C5, kite, paraglider)-free, and \chi(G) \leq max{3, \omega(G)} if G is $(P_7, C_5$, H)-free with H being a diamond or a paw. We also show that \chi(G) \le

Perfect divisibility and coloring of some fork-free graphs

A $hole$ is an induced cycle of length at least four, and an odd hole is a hole of odd length. A {\em fork} is a graph obtained from $K_{1,3}$ by subdividing an edge once. An {\em odd balloon} is a graph obtained from an odd hole by identifying respectively two consecutive vertices with two leaves of $K_{1, 3}$. A {\em gem} is a graph that consists of a $P_4$ plus a vertex adjacent to all vertices of the $P_4$. A {\em butterfly} is a graph obtained from two traingles by sharing exactly one vertex. A graph $G$ is perfectly divisible if for each induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $\omega(H[B])<\omega(H)$. In this paper, we show that (odd balloon, fork)-free graphs are perfectly divisible (this generalizes some results of Karthick {\em et al}). As an application, we show that $\chi(G)\le\binom{\omega(G)+1}{2}$ if $G$ is (fork, gem)-free or (fork, butterfly)-free

Coloring_of_some_crown-free_graphs

Let $G$ and $H$ be two vertex disjoint graphs. The {\em union} $G\cup H$ is the graph with $V(G\cup H)=V(G)\cup (H)$ and $E(G\cup H)=E(G)\cup E(H)$. The {\em join} $G+H$ is the graph with $V(G+H)=V(G)+V(H)$ and $E(G+H)=E(G)\cup E(H)\cup\{xy\;|\; x\in V(G), y\in V(H)$$\}$. We use $P_k$ to denote a {\em path} on $k$ vertices, use {\em fork} to denote the graph obtained from $K_{1,3}$ by subdividing an edge once, and use {\em crown} to denote the graph $K_1+K_{1,3}$. In this paper, we show that (\romannumeral 1) $\chi(G)\le\frac{3}{2}(\omega^2(G)-\omega(G))$ if $G$ is (crown, $P_5$)-free, (\romannumeral 2) $\chi(G)\le\frac{1}{2}(\omega^2(G)+\omega(G))$ if $G$ is (crown, fork)-free, and (\romannumeral 3) $\chi(G)\le\frac{1}{2}\omega^2(G)+\frac{3}{2}\omega(G)+1$ if $G$ is (crown, $P_3\cup P_2$)-free.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2302.0680

A note on chromatic number and induced odd cycles

An odd hole is an induced odd cycle of length at least 5. Scott and Seymour confirmed a conjecture of Gyarfas and proved that if a graph G has no odd holes then chi(G) \u3c=( 2 omega(G)+2). Chudnovsky, Robertson, Seymour and Thomas showed that if G has neither K-4 nor odd holes then chi(G) \u3c= 4. In this note, we show that if a graph G has neither triangles nor quadrilaterals, and has no odd holes of length at least 7, then chi(G) \u3c= 4 and chi(G) \u3c= 3 if G has radius at most 3, and for each vertex u of G, the set of vertices of the same distance to u induces abipartite subgraph. This answers some questions in [17]

On endo-homology of complexes of graphs

AbstractLet L be a subcomplex of a complex K. If the homomorphism from inclusion i∗:Hq(L)→Hq(K) is an isomorphism for all q ⩾ 0, then we say that L and K are endo-homologous. The clique complex of a graph G, denoted by C(G), is an abstract complex whose simplices are the cliques of G. The present paper is a generalization of Ivashchenko (1994) along several directions. For a graph G and a given subgraph F of G, some necessary and sufficient conditions for C(G) to be endo-homologous to C(F) are given. Similar theorems hold also for the independence complex I(G) of G, where I(G) − C(Gc), the clique complex of the complement of G