Genomic structural variations lead to dysregulation of important coding and non-coding RNA species in dilated cardiomyopathy

The transcriptome needs to be tightly regulated by mechanisms that include transcription factors, enhancers, and repressors as well as non-coding RNAs. Besides this dynamic regulation, a large part of phenotypic variability of eukaryotes is expressed through changes in gene transcription caused by genetic variation. In this study, we evaluate genome-wide structural genomic variants (SVs) and their association with gene expression in the human heart. We detected 3,898 individual SVs affecting all classes of gene transcripts (e.g., mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA) and regulatory genomic regions (e.g., enhancer or TFBS). In a cohort of patients (n = 50) with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), 80,635 non-protein-coding elements of the genome are deleted or duplicated by SVs, containing 3,758 long non-coding RNAs and 1,756 protein-coding transcripts. 65.3% of the SV-eQTLs do not harbor a significant SNV-eQTL, and for the regions with both classes of association, we find similar effect sizes. In case of deleted protein-coding exons, we find downregulation of the associated transcripts, duplication events, however, do not show significant changes over all events. In summary, we are first to describe the genomic variability associated with SVs in heart failure due to DCM and dissect their impact on the transcriptome. Overall, SVs explain up to 7.5% of the variation of cardiac gene expression, underlining the importance to study human myocardial gene expression in the context of the individual genome. This has immediate implications for studies on basic mechanisms of cardiac maladaptation, biomarkers, and (gene) therapeutic studies alike

Atlas of the clinical genetics of human dilated cardiomyopathy

[Abstract] Aim. Numerous genes are known to cause dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). However, until now technological limitations have hindered elucidation of the contribution of all clinically relevant disease genes to DCM phenotypes in larger cohorts. We now utilized next-generation sequencing to overcome these limitations and screened all DCM disease genes in a large cohort. Methods and results. In this multi-centre, multi-national study, we have enrolled 639 patients with sporadic or familial DCM. To all samples, we applied a standardized protocol for ultra-high coverage next-generation sequencing of 84 genes, leading to 99.1% coverage of the target region with at least 50-fold and a mean read depth of 2415. In this well characterized cohort, we find the highest number of known cardiomyopathy mutations in plakophilin-2, myosin-binding protein C-3, and desmoplakin. When we include yet unknown but predicted disease variants, we find titin, plakophilin-2, myosin-binding protein-C 3, desmoplakin, ryanodine receptor 2, desmocollin-2, desmoglein-2, and SCN5A variants among the most commonly mutated genes. The overlap between DCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and channelopathy causing mutations is considerably high. Of note, we find that >38% of patients have compound or combined mutations and 12.8% have three or even more mutations. When comparing patients recruited in the eight participating European countries we find remarkably little differences in mutation frequencies and affected genes. Conclusion. This is to our knowledge, the first study that comprehensively investigated the genetics of DCM in a large-scale cohort and across a broad gene panel of the known DCM genes. Our results underline the high analytical quality and feasibility of Next-Generation Sequencing in clinical genetic diagnostics and provide a sound database of the genetic causes of DCM.Hôpitaux de Paris; PHRC AOM0414

Towards Personalized Cardiology: Multi-Scale Modeling of the Failing Heart

<div><p>Background</p><p>Despite modern pharmacotherapy and advanced implantable cardiac devices, overall prognosis and quality of life of HF patients remain poor. This is in part due to insufficient patient stratification and lack of individualized therapy planning, resulting in less effective treatments and a significant number of non-responders.</p><p>Methods and Results</p><p>State-of-the-art clinical phenotyping was acquired, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biomarker assessment. An individualized, multi-scale model of heart function covering cardiac anatomy, electrophysiology, biomechanics and hemodynamics was estimated using a robust framework. The model was computed on n=46 HF patients, showing for the first time that advanced multi-scale models can be fitted consistently on large cohorts. Novel multi-scale parameters derived from the model of all cases were analyzed and compared against clinical parameters, cardiac imaging, lab tests and survival scores to evaluate the explicative power of the model and its potential for better patient stratification. Model validation was pursued by comparing clinical parameters that were not used in the fitting process against model parameters.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>This paper illustrates how advanced multi-scale models can complement cardiovascular imaging and how they could be applied in patient care. Based on obtained results, it becomes conceivable that, after thorough validation, such heart failure models could be applied for patient management and therapy planning in the future, as we illustrate in one patient of our cohort who received CRT-D implantation.</p></div

Genomic structural variations lead to dysregulation of important coding and non‐coding RNA species in dilated cardiomyopathy

Abstract The transcriptome needs to be tightly regulated by mechanisms that include transcription factors, enhancers, and repressors as well as non‐coding RNAs. Besides this dynamic regulation, a large part of phenotypic variability of eukaryotes is expressed through changes in gene transcription caused by genetic variation. In this study, we evaluate genome‐wide structural genomic variants (SVs) and their association with gene expression in the human heart. We detected 3,898 individual SVs affecting all classes of gene transcripts (e.g., mRNA, miRNA, lncRNA) and regulatory genomic regions (e.g., enhancer or TFBS). In a cohort of patients (n = 50) with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), 80,635 non‐protein‐coding elements of the genome are deleted or duplicated by SVs, containing 3,758 long non‐coding RNAs and 1,756 protein‐coding transcripts. 65.3% of the SV‐eQTLs do not harbor a significant SNV‐eQTL, and for the regions with both classes of association, we find similar effect sizes. In case of deleted protein‐coding exons, we find downregulation of the associated transcripts, duplication events, however, do not show significant changes over all events. In summary, we are first to describe the genomic variability associated with SVs in heart failure due to DCM and dissect their impact on the transcriptome. Overall, SVs explain up to 7.5% of the variation of cardiac gene expression, underlining the importance to study human myocardial gene expression in the context of the individual genome. This has immediate implications for studies on basic mechanisms of cardiac maladaptation, biomarkers, and (gene) therapeutic studies alike

Statistics of estimated Windkessel parameters throughout the studied population.

<p>Statistics of estimated Windkessel parameters throughout the studied population.</p

Automated estimation of the 3D anatomical model.

<p><b>A)</b> Automatic segmentation of the right and left ventricle. <b>B)</b> Observed variability in cardiac anatomy (shape is color-coded on a template) estimated from the HF cohort. The representation indicates the variability in phenotypes from the cohort. <b>C)</b> After the different steps of the model computation are finished, computed intracardiac volume variations can be estimated. <b>D)</b> Fiber architecture applied to the personalized heart models.</p

Patient-specific hemodynamics.

<p><b>A)</b> Personalized computation of arterial flow after personalization of the Windkessel parameters. <b>B)</b> Measured and computed LV pressure and volume curve in one patient, showing the high concordance between the clinical and modeling data.</p

Clinical characteristics of the patient cohort with non-ischemic systolic HF.

<p>ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB: angiotensin II receptor blocker; DCM: dilated cardiomyopathy; No: Number; NYHA: New York Heart Association; SD: Standard deviation.</p><p>Clinical characteristics of the patient cohort with non-ischemic systolic HF.</p

Correlations between LV active force and LV stiffness and clinical presentations of patients.

<p>Correlations between LV active force and LV stiffness and clinical presentations of patients.</p

ECG and cMRI findings of patient cohort with non-ischemic systolic HF.

<p>EA: electric axis of the heart; LV-EF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LV-SV: left ventricular stroke volume; No: Number; SD: Standard deviation.</p><p>ECG and cMRI findings of patient cohort with non-ischemic systolic HF.</p