71 research outputs found

    Are Logical Intuitions Only Make-Believe? Reexamining the Logic-Liking Effect

    Get PDF
    An ongoing debate in the literature on human reasoning concerns whether or not the logical status (valid vs. invalid) of an argument can be intuitively detected. The finding that conclusions of logically valid inferences are liked more compared to conclusions of logically invalid ones—called the logic-liking effect—is one of the most prominent pieces of evidence in support of this notion. Trippas et al. (2016) found this logic-liking effect for different kinds of inferences, including conditional and categorical syllogisms. However, all invalid conclusions presented by Trippas et al. (2016) were also impossible given the premises and had a particular structure of surface features—that is, an incongruent atmosphere. We present new data from five preregistered experiments in which we replicate the effect reported by Trippas et al. (2016) for conditional and categorical syllogisms but show that this effect is eliminated when controlling for confounds in surface features. Moreover, we present evidence that there is a demand effect at play, which suggests that people are deliberately considering atmosphere cues of an argument to inform their liking ratings. Taken together, the findings of the present study cast doubt on the existence of logical intuitions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved

    Таксононімія логічних девіацій у нормативно-правових актах

    Get PDF
    Розглянуто особливості логічних девіацій у текстах нормативно-правових актів, які є складовою частиною офіційно-ділового стилю української літературної мови. Запропоновано власний підхід до класифікації виявлених у текстах чинних кодексів логічно аномальних уживань.The features of the logical deviations in the texts of laws which belong to the official style of Ukrainian literary language is under consideration. The taxonomy for the notion above in Ukrainian laws is proposed

    A note on one-pass CASE statement compilation

    No full text

    Protein content of the evening meal and nocturnal plasma glucose regulation in type-I diabetic subjects

    No full text
    The effect of two isocaloric evening meals (low protein-high fat vs. high protein-low fat content) on plasma glucose regulation during the night were compared. Eight C-peptide-deficient type-I diabetic subjects without autonomic neuropathy were treated with fixed doses of continuous infusions of insulin during 2 nights. At 7 p.m. they received in random order either a low protein-high fat (5% of total energy protein, 60% fat, 35% carbohydrate) or a high protein-low fat (35% protein, 30% fat, 35% carbohydrate) evening meal. Venous plasma samples were drawn hourly thereafter. Plasma glucose concentrations were similar postprandially during the 2 nights between 7 p.m. and 11 p.m., but they were higher in the early morning hours after the high protein meal (p textless 0.02 vs. the low protein meal). Two subjects developed symptomatic hypoglycemia after the low protein meal. Plasma glucagon concentrations were higher (p = 0.023) and serum free insulin lower (p textless 0.05) after the high protein-low fat meal. Plasma cortisol and growth hormone were not significantly different between the two diets. Therefore, an increase in the protein content of the evening meal (fat content diminished) increases plasma glucose concentrations several hours later in the night, possibly due to protein-induced glucagon secretion and to lower plasma free insulin levels. Patients with type-I diabetes with a tendency to develop hypoglycemia during the night may avoid this problem by increasing the protein content of the evening meal
    corecore