The future of the global food system

Although food prices in major world markets are at or near a historical low, there is increasing concern about food security—the ability of the world to provide healthy and environmentally sustainable diets for all its peoples. This article is an introduction to a collection of reviews whose authors were asked to explore the major drivers affecting the food system between now and 2050. A first set of papers explores the main factors affecting the demand for food (population growth, changes in consumption patterns, the effects on the food system of urbanization and the importance of understanding income distributions) with a second examining trends in future food supply (crops, livestock, fisheries and aquaculture, and ‘wild food’). A third set explores exogenous factors affecting the food system (climate change, competition for water, energy and land, and how agriculture depends on and provides ecosystem services), while the final set explores cross-cutting themes (food system economics, food wastage and links with health). Two of the clearest conclusions that emerge from the collected papers are that major advances in sustainable food production and availability can be achieved with the concerted application of current technologies (given sufficient political will), and the importance of investing in research sooner rather than later to enable the food system to cope with both known and unknown challenges in the coming decades

Solenodon genome reveals convergent evolution of venom in eulipotyphlan mammals

Venom systems are key adaptations that have evolved throughout the tree of life and typically facilitate predation or defense. Despite venoms being model systems for studying a variety of evolutionary and physiological processes, many taxonomic groups remain understudied, including venomous mammals. Within the order Eulipotyphla, multiple shrew species and solenodons have oral venom systems. Despite morphological variation of their delivery systems, it remains unclear whether venom represents the ancestral state in this group or is the result of multiple independent origins. We investigated the origin and evolution of venom in eulipotyphlans by characterizing the venom system of the endangered Hispaniolan solenodon (Solenodon paradoxus). We constructed a genome to underpin proteomic identifications of solenodon venom toxins, before undertaking evolutionary analyses of those constituents, and functional assessments of the secreted venom. Our findings show that solenodon venom consists of multiple paralogous kallikrein 1 (KLK1) serine proteases, which cause hypotensive effects in vivo, and seem likely to have evolved to facilitate vertebrate prey capture. Comparative analyses provide convincing evidence that the oral venom systems of solenodons and shrews have evolved convergently, with the 4 independent origins of venom in eulipotyphlans outnumbering all other venom origins in mammals. We find that KLK1s have been independently coopted into the venom of shrews and solenodons following their divergence during the late Cretaceous, suggesting that evolutionary constraints may be acting on these genes. Consequently, our findings represent a striking example of convergent molecular evolution and demonstrate that distinct structural backgrounds can yield equivalent functions

Solenodon genome reveals convergent evolution of venom in eulipotyphlan mammals

Venom systems are key adaptations that have evolved throughout the tree of life and typically facilitate predation or defense. Despite venoms being model systems for studying a variety of evolutionary and physiological processes, many taxonomic groups remain understudied, including venomous mammals. Within the order Eulipotyphla, multiple shrew species and solenodons have oral venom systems. Despite morphological variation of their delivery systems, it remains unclear whether venom represents the ancestral state in this group or is the result of multiple independent origins. We investigated the origin and evolution of venom in eulipotyphlans by characterizing the venom system of the endangered Hispaniolan solenodon (Solenodon paradoxus). We constructed a genome to underpin proteomic identifications of solenodon venom toxins, before undertaking evolutionary analyses of those constituents, and functional assessments of the secreted venom. Our findings show that solenodon venom consists of multiple paralogous kallikrein 1 (KLK1) serine proteases, which cause hypotensive effects in vivo, and seem likely to have evolved to facilitate vertebrate prey capture. Comparative analyses provide convincing evidence that the oral venom systems of solenodons and shrews have evolved convergently, with the 4 independent origins of venom in eulipotyphlans outnumbering all other venom origins in mammals. We find that KLK1s have been independently coopted into the venom of shrews and solenodons following their divergence during the late Cretaceous, suggesting that evolutionary constraints may be acting on these genes. Consequently, our findings represent a striking example of convergent molecular evolution and demonstrate that distinct structural backgrounds can yield equivalent functions

Effect of multiple-antibiotic treatments on the evolution of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

To combat the ever-growing clinical burden imposed by antibiotic-resistant pathogens, multiple-antibiotic treatments are increasingly being considered as promising treatment options. The impact of multiple-antibiotic treatments on the evolution of resistance is not well understood however, and debate is ongoing about the effectiveness of various multiple-antibiotic treatments. In this thesis, I investigate how aspects of multiple-antibiotic treatments impact the rate of evolution of antibiotic resistance in the opportunistic human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In particular, I look at the impact of interactions between antibiotics in combination on the evolution of resistance, and how creating heterogeneity in the antibiotic environment by rotating the antibiotics used may change the rate of evolution of resistance. I characterise the interactions present in 120 combinations of antibiotics and find that the type of interaction can be predicted by the mechanism of action of the antibiotics involved. I investigate the effect of a subset of these combinations on the evolution of antibiotic resistance. My results refute the influential but poorly-evidenced hypothesis that synergistic combinations accelerate the evolution of resistance, even when synergistic combinations have the same inhibitory effect on sensitive bacteria as additive or antagonistic antibiotic combinations. I focus on a combination of the antibiotics ceftriaxone and sulfamethoxazole and test whether it is more effective in preventing the evolution of resistance than predicted by the inhibitory effect of the combination on sensitive bacteria. I do not find the combination to be more effective than predicted. Finally, I create heterogeneous antibiotic environments by rotating the antibiotic present at different rates. For the first time in a laboratory setting, I test how varying the rate of fluctuation in the antibiotics present in a heterogeneous antibiotic environment impacts the rate of evolution of resistance. Unexpectedly, I find the rate of evolution of resistance increases with increasing levels of antibiotic heterogeneity.</p

Effect of multiple-antibiotic treatments on the evolution of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

To combat the ever-growing clinical burden imposed by antibiotic-resistant pathogens, multiple-antibiotic treatments are increasingly being considered as promising treatment options. The impact of multiple-antibiotic treatments on the evolution of resistance is not well understood however, and debate is ongoing about the effectiveness of various multiple-antibiotic treatments. In this thesis, I investigate how aspects of multiple-antibiotic treatments impact the rate of evolution of antibiotic resistance in the opportunistic human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In particular, I look at the impact of interactions between antibiotics in combination on the evolution of resistance, and how creating heterogeneity in the antibiotic environment by rotating the antibiotics used may change the rate of evolution of resistance. I characterise the interactions present in 120 combinations of antibiotics and find that the type of interaction can be predicted by the mechanism of action of the antibiotics involved. I investigate the effect of a subset of these combinations on the evolution of antibiotic resistance. My results refute the influential but poorly-evidenced hypothesis that synergistic combinations accelerate the evolution of resistance, even when synergistic combinations have the same inhibitory effect on sensitive bacteria as additive or antagonistic antibiotic combinations. I focus on a combination of the antibiotics ceftriaxone and sulfamethoxazole and test whether it is more effective in preventing the evolution of resistance than predicted by the inhibitory effect of the combination on sensitive bacteria. I do not find the combination to be more effective than predicted. Finally, I create heterogeneous antibiotic environments by rotating the antibiotic present at different rates. For the first time in a laboratory setting, I test how varying the rate of fluctuation in the antibiotics present in a heterogeneous antibiotic environment impacts the rate of evolution of resistance. Unexpectedly, I find the rate of evolution of resistance increases with increasing levels of antibiotic heterogeneity.</p

Effect of multiple-antibiotic treatments on the evolution of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

To combat the ever-growing clinical burden imposed by antibiotic-resistant pathogens, multiple-antibiotic treatments are increasingly being considered as promising treatment options. The impact of multiple-antibiotic treatments on the evolution of resistance is not well understood however, and debate is ongoing about the effectiveness of various multiple-antibiotic treatments. In this thesis, I investigate how aspects of multiple-antibiotic treatments impact the rate of evolution of antibiotic resistance in the opportunistic human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In particular, I look at the impact of interactions between antibiotics in combination on the evolution of resistance, and how creating heterogeneity in the antibiotic environment by rotating the antibiotics used may change the rate of evolution of resistance. I characterise the interactions present in 120 combinations of antibiotics and find that the type of interaction can be predicted by the mechanism of action of the antibiotics involved. I investigate the effect of a subset of these combinations on the evolution of antibiotic resistance. My results refute the influential but poorly-evidenced hypothesis that synergistic combinations accelerate the evolution of resistance, even when synergistic combinations have the same inhibitory effect on sensitive bacteria as additive or antagonistic antibiotic combinations. I focus on a combination of the antibiotics ceftriaxone and sulfamethoxazole and test whether it is more effective in preventing the evolution of resistance than predicted by the inhibitory effect of the combination on sensitive bacteria. I do not find the combination to be more effective than predicted. Finally, I create heterogeneous antibiotic environments by rotating the antibiotic present at different rates. For the first time in a laboratory setting, I test how varying the rate of fluctuation in the antibiotics present in a heterogeneous antibiotic environment impacts the rate of evolution of resistance. Unexpectedly, I find the rate of evolution of resistance increases with increasing levels of antibiotic heterogeneity