Reduction of airspace after lung resection through controlled paralysis of the diaphragm

Objectives: Residual airspace following thoracic resections is a common clinical problem. Persistent air leak, prolonged drainage time, and reduced hemostasis extend hospital stay and morbidity. We report a trial of pharmacologic-induced diaphragmatic paralysis through continuous paraphrenic injection of lidocaine to reduced residual airspace. The objectives were confirmation of diaphragmatic paralysis and possible procedure related complications. Methods: Six eligible patients undergoing resectional surgery (lobectomy or bilobectomy) were included. Inclusion criteria consisted of: postoperative predicted FEV1 greater than 1300ml, right-sided resection, absence of parenchymal lung disease, no class III antiarrhythmic therapy, absence of hypersensitivity reactions to lidocaine, no signs of infection, and informed consent. Upon completion of resection an epidural catheter was attached in the periphrenic tissue on the proximal pericardial surface, externalized through a separate parasternal incision, and connected to a perfusing system injecting lidocaine 1% at a rate of 3ml/h (30mg/h). Postoperative ICU surveillance for 24h and daily measurement of vital signs, drainage output, and bedside spirometry were performed. Within 48h fluoroscopic confirmation of diaphragmatic paralysis was obtained. The catheter removal coincided with the chest tube removal when no procedural related complications occurred. Results: None of the patients reported respiratory impairment. Diaphragmatic paralysis was documented in all patients. Upon removal of catheter or discontinuation of lidocaine prompt return of diaphragmatic motility was noticed. Two patients showed postoperative hemodynamic irrelevant atrial fibrillation. Conclusion: Postoperative paraphrenic catheter administration of lidocaine to ensure reversible diaphragmatic paralysis is safe and reproducible. Further studies have to assess a benefit in terms of reduction in morbidity, drainage time, and hospital stay, and determine the patients who will profi

Off-label use of thoracic aortic endovascular stent grafts to simplify difficult resections and procedures in general thoracic surgery

OBJECTIVES Tumour infiltration, or gross infectious involvement of the thoracic aortic wall, poses a significant intraoperative risk for fatal bleeding and therefore could compromise adequate resection or efficient surgical management of pleural infection in a considerable amount of cases. We present 3 successful cases of off-label thoracic aortic endografting to safeguard thoracic aortic wall integrity. METHODS After all patients received thoracic stent grafts through femoral access into the descending aorta, the first patient underwent a resection of a locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the left inferior lobe cT4cN0–1cM0 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, which had infiltrated the descending aortic wall. The second case was video-assisted thoracoscopic bilateral pleural decortication for empyema with aortic ulcers of the distal thoracic aorta in a patient with pancreatic intrathoracic fistula in a necrotizing pancreatitis. The third patient was operated for a locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the left inferior lobe initial stage cT4 cN1–2 cM0 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, which had broad contact to the descending aorta at the level of thoracic vertebrae 7 and 8 on a circumference of circa 180°. Regional ethics committee approval according the Swiss Federal Human Research Act was obtained according to regulations. RESULTS Preventive stent graft placement resulted in complication-free resection and significantly minimized the risk of fatal intraoperative bleeding. Patients were thus not exposed to complications associated with aortic cross-clamping, possible prosthetic replacement and extracorporeal circulation techniques. CONCLUSIONS In carefully selected patient populations, the resection of locally advanced tumours or infectious processes involving the aortic wall can be facilitated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair prior to resection

Off-label use of thoracic aortic endovascular stent grafts to simplify difficult resections and procedures in general thoracic surgery

Abstract OBJECTIVES Tumour infiltration, or gross infectious involvement of the thoracic aortic wall, poses a significant intraoperative risk for fatal bleeding and therefore could compromise adequate resection or efficient surgical management of pleural infection in a considerable amount of cases. We present 3 successful cases of off-label thoracic aortic endografting to safeguard thoracic aortic wall integrity. METHODS After all patients received thoracic stent grafts through femoral access into the descending aorta, the first patient underwent a resection of a locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the left inferior lobe cT4cN0-1cM0 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, which had infiltrated the descending aortic wall. The second case was video-assisted thoracoscopic bilateral pleural decortication for empyema with aortic ulcers of the distal thoracic aorta in a patient with pancreatic intrathoracic fistula in a necrotizing pancreatitis. The third patient was operated for a locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the left inferior lobe initial stage cT4 cN1-2 cM0 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, which had broad contact to the descending aorta at the level of thoracic vertebrae 7 and 8 on a circumference of circa 180°. Regional ethics committee approval according the Swiss Federal Human Research Act was obtained according to regulations. RESULTS Preventive stent graft placement resulted in complication-free resection and significantly minimized the risk of fatal intraoperative bleeding. Patients were thus not exposed to complications associated with aortic cross-clamping, possible prosthetic replacement and extracorporeal circulation techniques. CONCLUSIONS In carefully selected patient populations, the resection of locally advanced tumours or infectious processes involving the aortic wall can be facilitated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair prior to resection

Reduction of airspace after lung resection through controlled paralysis of the diaphragm

OBJECTIVES: Residual airspace following thoracic resections is a common clinical problem. Persistent air leak, prolonged drainage time, and reduced hemostasis extend hospital stay and morbidity. We report a trial of pharmacologic-induced diaphragmatic paralysis through continuous paraphrenic injection of lidocaine to reduced residual airspace. The objectives were confirmation of diaphragmatic paralysis and possible procedure related complications. METHODS: Six eligible patients undergoing resectional surgery (lobectomy or bilobectomy) were included. Inclusion criteria consisted of: postoperative predicted FEV1 greater than 1300 ml, right-sided resection, absence of parenchymal lung disease, no class III antiarrhythmic therapy, absence of hypersensitivity reactions to lidocaine, no signs of infection, and informed consent. Upon completion of resection an epidural catheter was attached in the periphrenic tissue on the proximal pericardial surface, externalized through a separate parasternal incision, and connected to a perfusing system injecting lidocaine 1% at a rate of 3 ml/h (30 mg/h). Postoperative ICU surveillance for 24h and daily measurement of vital signs, drainage output, and bedside spirometry were performed. Within 48 h fluoroscopic confirmation of diaphragmatic paralysis was obtained. The catheter removal coincided with the chest tube removal when no procedural related complications occurred. RESULTS: None of the patients reported respiratory impairment. Diaphragmatic paralysis was documented in all patients. Upon removal of catheter or discontinuation of lidocaine prompt return of diaphragmatic motility was noticed. Two patients showed postoperative hemodynamic irrelevant atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSION: Postoperative paraphrenic catheter administration of lidocaine to ensure reversible diaphragmatic paralysis is safe and reproducible. Further studies have to assess a benefit in terms of reduction in morbidity, drainage time, and hospital stay, and determine the patients who will profit

Stage III N2 non-small cell lung cancer treatment: decision-making among surgeons and radiation oncologists.

Background Stage III N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a very heterogeneous disease associated with a poor prognosis. A number of therapeutic options are available for patients with Stage III N2 NSCLC, including surgery [with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx)/neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT)] or CRT potentially followed by adjuvant immunotherapy. We have no clear evidence demonstrating a significant survival benefit for either of these approaches, the selection between treatments is not always straightforward and can come down to physician and patient preference. The very heterogeneous definition of resectability of N2 disease makes the decision-making process even more complex. Methods We evaluated the treatment strategies for preoperatively diagnosed stage III cN2 NSCLC among Swiss thoracic surgeons and radiation oncologists. Treatment strategies were converted into decision trees and analysed for consensus and discrepancies. We analysed factors relevant to decision-making within these recommendations. Results For resectable "non-bulky" mediastinal lymph node involvement, there was a trend towards surgery. Numerous participants recommend a surgical approach outside existing guidelines as long as the disease was resectable, even in multilevel N2. With increasing extent of mediastinal nodal disease, multimodal treatment based on radiotherapy was more common. Conclusions Both, surgery- or radiotherapy-based treatment regimens are feasible options in the management of Stage III N2 NSCLC. The different opinions reflected in the results of this manuscript reinforce the importance of a multidisciplinary setting and the importance of shared decision-making with the patient