5 research outputs found

    Effects of analgesic intervention on behavioural responses to Low Atmospheric Pressure Stunning

    Get PDF
    Worldwide, more than 50 billion chickens are killed annually for food production so their welfare at slaughter is an important concern. Low Atmospheric Pressure Stunning (LAPS) is a novel approach to pre-slaughter stunning of poultry in which birds are rendered unconscious by gradually reducing oxygen tension in the atmosphere to achieve a progressive anoxia (hypobaric hypoxia). Advantages of this approach over electrical stunning are that birds are not shackled while conscious and all birds are reliably and irreversibly stunned. However, concerns remain that birds undergoing LAPS could experience discomfort or pain. Here we investigated whether subjecting birds to LAPS with and without administration of an opioid analgesic (butorphanol) affected behavioural responses. A blocking design was used in which pairs of birds receiving either analgesic or sham treatment were allocated to three types (analgesic/analgesic, analgesic/sham, or sham/sham). In line with previous studies, birds showed a consistent sequence of behaviours during LAPS: ataxia, loss of posture, clonic/tonic convulsions, leg paddling and motionless. Overall, administration of butorphanol had no effect on the range and patterning of behavioural responses during LAPS, but there were some differences in behaviour latencies, counts and durations. For example, latencies to ataxia, mandibulation and deep inhalation were delayed by analgesic treatment, however the duration of ataxia and other behaviours related to loss of consciousness were unaffected. Fewer birds receiving analgesia showed jumping and slow wing flapping behaviour compared to controls, which suggests these may be pain related. These behaviours after the onset of ataxia and the results may reflect a smoother induction to unconsciousness in analgised birds. Collectively, the results do not provide convincing evidence that birds undergoing LAPS are experiencing pain. While there were effects of analgesia on some aspects of behaviour, these could be explained by potential sedative, dysphoric and physiological side effects of butorphanol. The behavioural responses to LAPS appear to be primarily related to exposure to anoxia rather than hypobaric conditions, and thus in terms of welfare, this stunning method may be equivalent to controlled atmosphere stunning with inert gases

    Behavioural, brain and cardiac responses to hypobaric hypoxia in broiler chickens

    Get PDF
    A novel approach to pre-slaughter stunning of chickens has been developed in which birds are rendered unconscious by progressive hypobaric hypoxia. Termed Low Atmospheric Pressure Stunning (LAPS), this approach involves application of gradual decompression lasting 280 s according to a prescribed curve. We examined responses to LAPS by recording behaviour, electroencephalogram (EEG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) in individual male chickens, and interpreted these with regard to the welfare impact of the process. We also examined the effect of two temperature adjusted pressure curves on these responses. Broiler chickens were exposed to LAPS in 30 triplets (16 and 14 triplets assigned to each pressure curve). In each triplet, one bird was instrumented for recording of EEG and ECG while the behaviour of all three birds was observed. Birds showed a consistent sequence of behaviours during LAPS (ataxia, loss of posture, clonic convulsions and motionless) which were observed in all birds. Leg paddling, tonic convulsions, slow wing flapping, mandibulation, head shaking, open bill breathing, deep inhalation, jumping and vocalisation were observed in a proportion of birds. Spectral analysis of EEG responses at 2 s intervals throughout LAPS revealed progressive decreases in median frequency at the same time as corresponding progressive increases in total power, followed later by decreases in total power as all birds exhibited isoelectric EEG and died. There was a very pronounced increase in total power at 50–60 s into the LAPS cycle, which corresponded to dominance of the signal by high amplitude slow waves, indicating loss of consciousness. Slow wave EEG was seen early in the LAPS process, before behavioural evidence of loss of consciousness such as ataxia and loss of posture, almost certainly due to the fact that it was completely dark in the LAPS chamber. ECG recordings showed a pronounced bradycardia (starting on average 49.6 s into LAPS), often associated with arrhythmia, until around 60 s into LAPS when heart rate levelled off. There was a good correlation between behavioural, EEG and cardiac measures in relation to loss of consciousness which collectively provide a loss of consciousness estimate of around 60 s. There were some effects of temperature adjusted pressure curves on behavioural latencies and ECG responses, but in general responses were consistent and very similar to those reported in previous research on controlled atmosphere stunning with inert gases. The results suggest that the process is humane (slaughter without avoidable fear, anxiety, pain, suffering and distress). In particular, the maintenance of slow wave EEG patterns in the early part of LAPS (while birds are still conscious) is strongly suggestive that LAPS is non-aversive, since we would expect this to be interrupted by pain or discomfort

    Scientific, Ethical, and Economic Aspects of Farm Animal Welfare

    No full text
    Since the publication of the 1997 CAST task force report on the well-being of agricultural animals, myriad discoveries and improvements have been made in the respective areas of science involved in research on animal welfare. In 1997, six high-priority research areas needed for scientific advancement were identified. These were: "(1) bioethics and conflict resolution, (2) responses of individual animals to the production environment, (3) stress, (4) social behavior and space requirements, (5) cognition, and (6) alternative production practices and systems" (CAST 1997). In the interim between the 1997 publication and the current report, the priorities, state of the science, challenges, and approaches to addressing agricultural animal welfare have evolved considerably. First, the title change from animal well-being (the term more commonly used in the United States) to animal welfare is in keeping with growing global consensus on scientific terminology and definitions. Setting the stage here is the now widely accepted World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) definition of animal welfare, which clarifies that welfare is a property of the individual animal, and refers to the animal's state as scientifically assessed by examining its health, comfort, nutritional status, safety, behavior, and experience of mental states such as pain, fear, and distress (OIE 2008)
    corecore