Penile lenghthening original technique using a pubo-cavernous spacer. Long term results from a series of over 200 patients

Introduction: We report our long experience in the surgical treatment of patients requesting penile lengthening by suspensory ligament release and placement of a custom-made soft silicone pubo-cavernous spacer. The aim was to show that with this surgical technique the results obtained are maintained over time. It is crucial to achieve postoperative satisfaction of these patients who show fragility and self-esteem problems. Methods: From 1999 to 2020, we treated 245 patients with congenital or acquired penile brevity. We carefully analysed the preoperative and postoperative (at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months) penile size of the patients to evaluate whether this technique could allow the long-term maintenance of aesthetic results. We also assessed preoperative erectile function and we focused on the psychological aspects to avoid surgery in patients with dysmorphophobia. This original technique involves the section of the suspensory ligament and the implantation of a silicone spacer between the pubic symphysis and the corpora cavernosa. This spacer is conformed to the patient anatomy and maintains the relationship between the anatomical structures unchanged over time. Sexual self-esteem and patient satisfaction were assessed with the APPSSI questionnaire. Results: The mean increase in penile length was about 2.5 cm in flaccid state and 1.9 cm in stretched state. There were no injuries of the neurovascular bundle or urethra, and no erectile dysfunction was noted. These results persisted at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months without significant differences. Over 80% of patients stated that they were completely satisfied with the results obtained. This satisfaction remained stable along follow up. Conclusion: The section of the suspensory ligament and the implant of the soft silicone spacer provide real penis elongation with satisfactory results that persist over time. This technique avoids the frequent complication of short-term shortening due to the scar adhesions of the edges of the dissected ligament. The high aesthetic satisfaction of patients is stable at controls at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months

Safety and feasibility of outpatient surgery in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose: Most of endourological procedures along the urinary tract have been widely practiced as outpatient operations, including surgery for BPH. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess safety and feasibility of outpatient surgery for patients suffering from symptomatic BPH candidate for endoscopic disobstruction. Materials and methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase were searched up until March 30, 2020. MINORS tool was utilized to assess the quality of included studies and a pooled measure of failure or event rate (FR, ER) estimate was calculated. Further sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression were conducted to investigate contribution of moderators to heterogeneity. Results: Twenty studies with a total of 1626 patients treated according to outpatient criteria for endoscopic BPH surgery were included. In total, 18 studies reporting data on immediate hospital readmission and/or inability to discharge after endoscopic procedure presented FR estimates ranging from 1.7% to 51.1%. Pooled FR estimate was 7.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.2%-10.3%); Heterogeneity: Q=76.85; d.f.=17, p<.001; I2= 75.12%. Subgroup analysis according to surgical technique revealed difference among the three approaches with pooled FR of 3% (95%CI: 1%-4.9%), 7.1% (95%CI: 3.9-10.4) and 11.8% (95%CI: 7-16.7%) for TURP, Green-light and HoLEP respectively (p<.001). At meta-regression analysis, none of the retrieved covariates were able to significantly influence the cumulative outcomes reported. ER for postoperative complications and early outpatient visit showed a pooled estimate of 18.6% (95%CI: 13.2%-23.9%) and 7.7% (95%CI: 4.3%-11%) respectively. Conclusions: Our analysis revealed how transurethral procedures for BPH on an outpatient setting are overall reliable and safe. Of note, there were significant outcome differences between groups with regard of type of surgical procedure, perioperative prostate volume and discharge protocol suggesting the need for further prospective analysis to better elucidate the best strategy in such outpatient conduct

Regenerative medicine-based treatment of stress urinary incontinence with stem cells: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze clinical trials on the use of autologous stem cell [SC] injection for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence [SUI] in humans. Methods: We analyzed the effect in terms of UI improvement and continence recovery after treatment. A literature search was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Entry into the analysis was restricted to data collected from clinical prospective trials on humans, including female and male patients with SUI. We performed a cumulative meta-analysis to explore the trend in the effect size across different groups at follow-up. Available data were compared in terms of Event Rate [ER] for the percentage of pad-free patients. Results: 12 trials were enclosed in the analysis. Sample size of patients with SUI ranged from 5 to 123 cases, mainly female cases. Autologous muscle-derived [MDSC] were used in 9 and adipocyte-derived SC [ADSC] in 3 trials. Considering a random effect model, ER of continence recovery was 0.41 [95%CI 0.29 - 0.54], with similar results between the ADSC [ER, 0.40;95%CI 0.12 - 0.69] and the MDSC group [ER 0.41; 95%CI 0.27-0.55] [I2 84.69%; Q 104.69 - p<0.01] [Test of group differences p=0.96] Conclusions: Autologous MDSC or ADSC injection to treat SUI demonstrated to be a safe procedure and a 41% mean rate of continence recovery is described. A higher effort should be produced to design better clinical trials, objectively evaluating either modifications inside the urethral sphincter or long-term functional results in terms of pad test and UI questionnaires

Prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-metastatic and metastatic prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Role of platelet to lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in predicting prostate cancer characteristics in non metastatic and metastatic case

How the Analysis of the Pathogenetic Variants of DDR Genes Will Change the Management of Prostate Cancer Patients

Herein, we analyze answers achieved, open questions, and future perspectives regarding the analysis of the pathogenetic variants (PV) of DNA damage response (and repair) (DDR) genes in prostate cancer (PC) patients. The incidence of PVs in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes among men with metastatic PC varied between 11% and 33%, which was significantly higher than that in non-metastatic PC, and BRCA2 mutations were more frequent when compared to other DDR genes. The determination of the somatic or germline PVs of BRCA2 was able to define a tailored therapy using PARP inhibitors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progression after first-line therapy, with significant improvements in the radiologic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. We propose testing all metastatic PC patients for somatic and germline HRR mutations. Somatic determination on the primary site or on historic paraffin preparations with a temporal distance of no longer than 5 years should be preferred over metastatic site biopsies. The prognostic use of DDR PVs will also be used in selected high-risk cases with non-metastatic stages to better arrange controls and therapeutic primary options. We anticipate that the use of poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) and in combination with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) will be new strategies

Prognostic Value of Albumin to Globulin Ratio in Non-Metastatic and Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

The aim of our meta-analysis is to analyze data available in the literature regarding a possible prognostic value of the albumin to globulin ratio (AGR) in prostate cancer (PC) patients. We distinguished our analysis in terms of PC staging, histologic aggressiveness, and risk of progression after treatments. A literature search process was performed (“prostatic cancer”, “albumin”, “globulin”, “albumin to globulin ratio”) following the PRISMA guidelines. In our meta-analysis, the pooled Event Rate (ER) estimate for each group of interest was calculated using a random effect model. Cases were distinguished in Low and High AGR groups based on an optimal cut-off value defined at ROC analysis. Four clinical trials were enclosed (sample size range from 214 to 6041 cases). The pooled Risk Difference for a non-organ confined PC between High AGR and Low AGR cases was −0.05 (95%CI: −0.12–0.01) with a very low rate of heterogeneity (I2 < 0.15%; p = 0.43) among studies (test of group differences p = 0.21). In non-metastatic PC cases, the pooled Risk Difference for biochemical progression (BCP) between High AGR and Low AGR cases was −0.05 (95%CI: −0.12–0.01) (I2 = 0.01%; p = 0.69) (test of group differences p = 0.12). In metastatic PC cases, AGR showed an independent significant (p < 0.01) predictive value either in terms of progression free survival (PFS) (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.642 (0.430–0.957)) or cancer specific survival (CSS) (OR: 0.412 (0.259–0.654)). Our meta-analysis showed homogeneous results supporting no significant predictive values for AGR in terms of staging, grading and biochemical progression in non-metastatic PC

Comparison of Different Invasive Devices for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence after Radical Prostatectomy

Purpose: To compare different forms of invasive treatments for postradical prostatectomy (RP) urinary incontinence (UI) in terms of quantitative and qualitative parameters and continence recovery rate. Methods: We distinguished five categories of treatment: A = bulking agents, B = fixed slings, C = adjustable slings, D = circumferential compressor devices (artificial sphincter), and E = noncircumferential compressor devices (ProACT). A literature search was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. We performed a cumulative meta-analysis to explore the trend in the effect sizes across groups at postoperative follow-up. We compared the available treatment arms using standardized mean difference (SMD) and event rate (ER) for questionnaire results, number of pads/day, and percentage of pad-free patients. Evidence synthesis. 36 clinical trials were selected. At baseline, in the different populations, mean number of pad-day varied from 1.1 to 8.8, 24-hour pad weight varied extremely from 17.3 g to 747.0 g, and mean ICIQ-UI-SF questionnaire score varied from 4.8 to 18.6. Considering a random effect model among eligible studies, ER of continence recovery was 0.33 (95% CI -0.12-0.78), 0.63 (95% CI 0.55-0.71), 0.65 (95% CI 0.58-0.72), 0.50 (95% CI 0.34-0.66), and 0.53 (95%CI 0.36-0.70), respectively, in groups A, B, C, D, and E (I 2 85.87%; Q 249.82-P > 0.01) (test of group differences P=0.22). Conclusion: In our analysis, the use of adjustable and fixed slings is associated with the highest whereas the use of bulking agents is associated with the lowest recovery rate of continence after treatment. Results are conditioned by an elevated rate of heterogeneity in part explained with a high variability of consistence in urinary leakage at baseline among populations

A Biofeedback guided program or pelvic floor muscle electric stimulation can improve early recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is an early side effect after catheter removal. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare different forms of non-invasive treatments for post-RP UI and to analyze whether the addition of biofeedback (BF) and/or pelvic floor muscle electric stimulation (PFES) to PF muscle exercise (PFME) alone can improve results in terms of continence recovery rate

Safety and Feasibility of Outpatient Surgery in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose: Most of endourological procedures along the urinary tract have been widely practiced as outpatient operations, including surgery for BPH. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess safety and feasibility of outpatient surgery for patients suffering from symptomatic BPH candidate for endoscopic disobstruction. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase were searched up until March 30, 2020. MINORS tool was utilized to assess the quality of included studies and a pooled measure of failure or event rate (FR, ER) estimate was calculated. Further sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression were conducted to investigate contribution of moderators to heterogeneity. Results: Twenty studies with a total of 1626 patients treated according to outpatient criteria for endoscopic BPH surgery were included. In total, 18 studies reporting data on immediate hospital readmission and/or inability to discharge after endoscopic procedure presented FR estimates ranging from 1.7% to 51.1%. Pooled FR estimate was 7.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.2%-10.3%); Heterogeneity: Q=76.85; d.f.=17, p<.001; I2= 75.12%. Subgroup analysis according to surgical technique revealed difference among the three approaches with pooled FR of 3% (95%CI: 1%-4.9%), 7.1% (95%CI: 3.9-10.4) and 11.8% (95%CI: 7-16.7%) for TURP, Green-light and HoLEP respectively (p<.001). At metaregression analysis, none of the retrieved covariates were able to significantly influence the cumulative outcomes reported. ER for postoperative complications and early outpatient visit showed a pooled estimate of 18.6% (95%CI: 13.2%-23.9%) and 7.7% (95%CI: 4.3%-11%) respectively. Conclusions: Our analysis revealed how transurethral procedures for BPH on an outpatient setting are overall reliable and safe. Of note, there were significant outcome differences between groups with regard of type of surgical procedure, perioperative prostate volume and discharge protocol suggesting the need for further prospective analysis to better elucidate the best strategy in such outpatient conduct