120 research outputs found
Proportion of top 1% most cited papers (y axis), as a function of the number of papers published (x axis), for the cohort of researchers who have published their career number between 1981 and 1985, by domain.
<p>Only classes of numbers of papers with 30 researchers or more are shown. Power trendlines and R2 are were obtained using the Excel software.</p
Proportion of top 1% most cited papers, as a function of their number of papers published, for the cohort of researchers who have published their first paper between 2009 and 2013, by domain.
<p>Only classes of numbers of papers with 30 researchers or more are shown. Power trendlines and R2 are used for natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences, while 2nd order polynomials are used for medical and life sciences, and law, arts and humanities.</p
Number of disambiguated researchers, by year of first publication and broad field.
<p>Number of disambiguated researchers, by year of first publication and broad field.</p
Proportion of top 1% most cited papers for all cohorts of researchers, by domain.
<p>A) As a function of career length, B) As a function of their annual number of papers (rounded). Only groups with 30 researchers or more are shown.</p
Mitauischer Kalender auf das Jahr nach Christi Geburt 1839
http://www.ester.ee/record=b3578129*es
Bjerre, Andreas
http://tartu.ester.ee/record=b1063903~S1*es
Percentage of papers published by the five major publishers in Physics, 1973–2013.
<p>Percentage of papers published by the five major publishers in Physics, 1973–2013.</p
The concentration of journal use in Canadian universities
Presented at the 2017 SIGMET workshop
Percentages of inter- and intradisciplinary win-win, win-lose, lose-win and lose-lose relationships of subdiscipline pairs.
<p>Percentages of inter- and intradisciplinary win-win, win-lose, lose-win and lose-lose relationships of subdiscipline pairs.</p
Evolution of the mean relative citation impact of papers, by distance to publisher change, 1995–1998 and 2001–2004.
<p>Evolution of the mean relative citation impact of papers, by distance to publisher change, 1995–1998 and 2001–2004.</p
- …