Photon transport in thin disordered slabs

We examine using Monte Carlo simulations, photon transport in optically 'thin' slabs whose thickness L is only a few times the transport mean free path l∗, with particles of different scattering anisotropies. The confined geometry causes an auto-selection of only photons with looping paths to remain within the slab. The results of the Monte Carlo simulations are borne out by our analytical treatment that incorporates directional persistence by the use of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, which interpolates between the short time ballistic and long time diffusive regimes

An Ex Vivo Approach to Complex Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair

Ex vivo repair technique for a complex renal artery aneurysm may have several advantages. Smaller incision size and use of minimally invasive techniques may decrease incisional morbidity and improve recovery time, especially in patients with a high body mass index. Improved visualization afforded by back-table methods may also be valuable when repair of aneurysms involving multiple branches is necessary. We report of a successful case of laparoscopic nephrectomy, followed by back-table aneurysmorrhaphy and autotransplant, in a patient with a renal artery aneurysm

Process for the preparation of Dofetilide intermediates

N-methyl-2-(4-nitrophenyl)ethanamine of Formula-1 or its salt and 1-(2-chloroethoxy)-4-nitrobenzene are the key intermediates in the preparation of N-[4-(2-{[2-(4-methane sulfonamidophenoxy)ethyl] (methyl)amino}ethyl)phenyl]methanesulfonamide, is also known as Dofetilide. Current invention provides a process for the preparation of N-methyl-2-(4-nitrophenyl)ethanamine of Formula-1 or its salt and 1-(2-chloroethoxy)-4-nitrobenzene of formula-2. Formula-1 Formula-2

Prospective randomized comparison of a combined ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotrite with a standard ultrasonic lithotrite for percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PURPOSE: To compare the efficiency and cost effectiveness of a combined pneumatic and ultrasonic lithotrite (Lithoclast Ultra) and a standard ultrasonic lithotrite, (LUS-1) during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective randomized trial, 30 patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were randomized to PCNL with either the combined pneumatic and ultrasonic lithotrite (PUL) or a standard ultrasonic lithotrite (SUL). Patient demographics, stone composition, location, pre- and post-operative stone burden, fragmentation rates, and device failures were compared. RESULTS: There were 13 patients in the PUL group and 17 patients in the SUL group. Stone burden and location were equal. Overall, 64% of the PUL group had hard stones (defined as stones that were either pure or a mixture of cystine [3], calcium oxalate monohydrate [CaOxMono; 2], and calcium phosphate [CaPO4; 2]), and four had soft stones (3 struvite and 1 uric acid [UA]). In the SUL group, there were eight hard stones (5 CaOxMono and 3 CaPO4), and six soft stones (4 calcium oxalate dihydrate [CaOxDi] and 2 UA) (P = 0.51). Stone composition data were unavailable for five patients. Fragmentation time for the PAL was 37 minutes versus 31.5 minutes for the SUL (P = 0.22). Stone retrieval and mean operative times were similar for both groups. There were a total of three (23.1%) device-related problems in the PUL group, and eight (47%) in the SUL group. There was one (7.7%) device malfunction in the PUL group due to probe fracture. There were two (11.7%) device failures in the SUL group; one failure required the device to be reset every 30 minutes, and the second was an electrical failure. Suction tubing obstruction occurred twice (15.3%) in the PUL group and 35.3% in the SU group (P = 0.35). The stone-free rates for the PUL and SUL were 46% and 66.7%, respectively (P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: Although the PUL was more costly, stone ablation and clearance rates were similar for both the combined pneumatic and ultrasonic device and the standard ultrasonic device. When stratified with respect to stone composition, the PUL was more efficient for harder stones, and the SUL was more efficient for softer stones