Efficacy of Bamlanivimab/Etesevimab and Casirivimab/Imdevimab in Preventing Progression to Severe COVID-19 and Role of Variants of Concern

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of hospitalization or death in patients infected by SARS-CoV2 variants of concern (VOCs) receiving combinations of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), bamlanivimab/etesevimab or casirivimab/imdevimab. Methods: Observational prospective study conducted in two Italian hospitals (University Hospital of Pisa and San Donato Hospital, Arezzo) including consecutive outpatients with COVID-19 who received bamlanivimab/etesevimab or casirivimab/imdevimab from March 20th to May 10th 2021. All patients were at high risk of COVID-19 progression according to FDA/AIFA recommendations. Patients were divided into two study groups according to the infecting viral strain (VOCs): Alpha and Gamma group. The primary endpoint was a composite of hospitalization or death within 30 days from mAbs infusion. A Cox regression multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the primary outcome in the overall population. Results: The study included 165 patients: 105 were infected by the VOC Alpha and 43 by the VOC Gamma. In the Alpha group, no differences in the primary endpoint were observed between patients treated with bamlanivimab/etesevimab or casirivimab/imdevimab. Conversely, in the Gamma group, a higher proportion of patients treated with bamlanivimab/etesevimab met the primary endpoint compared to those receiving casirivimab/imdevimab (55% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.013). On multivariate Cox-regression analysis, the Gamma variant and days from symptoms onset to mAbs infusion were factors independently associated with higher risk of hospitalization or death, while casirivimab/imdevimab was protective (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13–0.83, p = 0.019). Conclusions: In patients infected by the SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant, bamlanivimab/etesevimab should be used with caution because of the high risk of disease progression

A Prognostic Model for Estimating the Time to Virologic Failure in HIV-1 Infected Patients Undergoing a New Combination Antiretroviral Therapy Regimen

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>HIV-1 genotypic susceptibility scores (GSSs) were proven to be significant prognostic factors of fixed time-point virologic outcomes after combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) switch/initiation. However, their relative-hazard for the time to virologic failure has not been thoroughly investigated, and an expert system that is able to predict how long a new cART regimen will remain effective has never been designed.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We analyzed patients of the Italian ARCA cohort starting a new cART from 1999 onwards either after virologic failure or as treatment-naïve. The time to virologic failure was the endpoint, from the 90^thday after treatment start, defined as the first HIV-1 RNA > 400 copies/ml, censoring at last available HIV-1 RNA before treatment discontinuation. We assessed the relative hazard/importance of GSSs according to distinct interpretation systems (Rega, ANRS and HIVdb) and other covariates by means of Cox regression and random survival forests (RSF). Prediction models were validated via the bootstrap and c-index measure.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The dataset included 2337 regimens from 2182 patients, of which 733 were previously treatment-naïve. We observed 1067 virologic failures over 2820 persons-years. Multivariable analysis revealed that low GSSs of cART were independently associated with the hazard of a virologic failure, along with several other covariates. Evaluation of predictive performance yielded a modest ability of the Cox regression to predict the virologic endpoint (c-index≈0.70), while RSF showed a better performance (c-index≈0.73, p < 0.0001 vs. Cox regression). Variable importance according to RSF was concordant with the Cox hazards.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>GSSs of cART and several other covariates were investigated using linear and non-linear survival analysis. RSF models are a promising approach for the development of a reliable system that predicts time to virologic failure better than Cox regression. Such models might represent a significant improvement over the current methods for monitoring and optimization of cART.</p

Viral hepatitis

The more recently introduced molecular tests that detect and quantify viral genomes complement the information obtained immunologically and, due to rapid turnaround times and the availability of user-friendly commercial kits, have acquired a key position in both the diagnosis and the follow-up of viral hepatitis. Direct detection of the infectious agent has an ancillary role in the laboratory diagnosis of hepatitis A due to the reliability and ease of anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) immunoglobulin M (IgM) testing. Viral RNA is tested for mainly by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). Certainly more important for laboratory diagnosis and disease management, however, are the so-called hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-minus core or precore mutants of the virus, which are unable to express HBeAg due to a stop codon in the C gene, and the drug-resistant variants that are commonly found in patients undergoing therapy. Qualitative nucleic acid-based tests are most useful in assessing the safety of blood donations but prove useful also when a suspicion of active infection based on serological grounds needs to be confirmed. In this case, it is advisable to retest negative patients several times at intervals of several weeks in order to identify the ones who might have intermittent viremia, as is frequently observed in the course of spontaneous resolution or antiviral therapy

Viral Hepatitis

5nonemixedBendinelli M.; M. Pistello; G. Freer; M. L. Vatteroni; F. MaggiM., Bendinelli; Pistello, M.; Freer, G.; Vatteroni, M. L.; Maggi, F

HIV-1 NAT minipool during the pre-seroconversion window period: Detection of a repeat blood donor

Background: The introduction of nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) for screening pooled or individual donations remarkably improved the safety of blood products. The size of mini-pooled NAT is considered critical for identification of HIV-1 infected donors during preseroconversion phase of infection. We describe a case of HIV-1 infection in a serologically negative repeat blood donor identified by 16 minipool (MP) NAT. Materials and Methods: The donation was tested by Roche Cobas AmpliScreen HIV-1 Test with manual extraction (MultiPrep Specimen Processing Procedure). The sensitivity of different MP sizes was observed. Serial samples of infected donor were examined with different third and fourth generation HIV-1 serological assays. Results: In the index donation viral load was 515 copies/ml corresponding to about 50 IU when diluted in 16 MP. Abbott third and fourth generation EIA tests detected the seroconversion four days later the index donation. Conclusion: The report emphasizes the relevance of a very small size of MP to really reduce the window serologic phase of current EIA test by HIV-1 NAT test. \uc2\ua9 2005 Blackwell Publishing