28 research outputs found

    Salt intake induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of the peritoneal membrane in rats

    Get PDF
    Methods. Twenty-eight Wistar rats were randomized to a normal salt (NS) or a high salt (HS) intake. NS and HS rats had free access to tap water or NaCl 2% as drinking water, respectively. After 2 weeks, samples of peritoneum were taken, and TGF-beta(1), Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA expression were quantified with qRT-PCR. Fibrosis and submesothelial PM thickness were scored. EMT was evaluated using fluorescence staining with cytokeratin and alpha smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA). Results. Dietary salt intake caused peritoneal fibrosis and thickening of the submesothelial layer and induced EMT as identified by colocalization of cytokeratin and alpha-SMA in cells present in the submesothelial layer. Peritoneal TGF-beta(1) and IL-6 mRNA expression were upregulated in the HS group. Conclusion. High dietary salt intake induces EMT and peritoneal fibrosis, a process coinciding with upregulation of TGF-beta 1

    Removal of water-soluble and protein-bound solutes with reversed mid-dilution versus post-dilution haemodiafiltration

    No full text
    Convective dialysis strategies are superior in the removal of protein-bound uraemic retention solutes. Mid-dilution and mixed-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF), both combining pre-dilution and post-dilution, are promising options to further improve removal capacity and have been shown of additional benefit for large middle molecules. In this study, we compared the removal of small water-soluble and protein-bound solutes in post-dilution versus mid-dilution HDF. Fourteen chronic haemodialysis (HD) patients were included in this crossover study. Patients were kept for 4 weeks on high-flux HD. On the mid-week session of Weeks 3 and 4, either post-dilution or reversed mid-dilution HDF were applied, in random order. Blood and dialysate flows were maintained at 300 and 800 mL/min, while the substitution flow was 75 mL/min in post-dilution and 150 mL/min in mid-dilution HDF. Based on the data collected during the sessions under study, extraction ratio (ER) and reduction ratio (RR) of small water-soluble and protein-bound solutes were calculated, as well as total solute removal (TSR) based on spent dialysate. No differences were observed for TSR, ER and RR for protein-bound solutes. For small water-soluble solutes, ER in post-dilution HDF was significantly higher than in mid-dilution HDF: 0.92 0.02 versus 0.87 0.04 for urea (P 0.001), 0.92 0.02 versus 0.88 0.02 for creatinine (P 0.001) and 0.84 0.02 versus 0.82 0.03 for uric acid (P 0.009). TSR and RR were, however, not different due to the lower inlet concentrations with post-dilution HDF. TSR of mid-dilution and post-dilution HDF was not different for both small water-soluble and protein-bound compounds. Both strategies in the setting as applied in this study are as adequate for the removal of these solutes
    corecore