Cell Death Signaling and Anticancer Therapy

For a long time, it was commonly believed that efficient anticancer regimens would either trigger the apoptotic demise of tumor cells or induce a permanent arrest in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, i.e., senescence. The recent discovery that necrosis can occur in a regulated fashion and the increasingly more precise characterization of the underlying molecular mechanisms have raised great interest, as non-apoptotic pathways might be instrumental to circumvent the resistance of cancer cells to conventional, pro-apoptotic therapeutic regimens. Moreover, it has been shown that some anticancer regimens engage lethal signaling cascades that can ignite multiple oncosuppressive mechanisms, including apoptosis, necrosis, and senescence. Among these signaling pathways is mitotic catastrophe, whose role as a bona fide cell death mechanism has recently been reconsidered. Thus, anticancer regimens get ever more sophisticated, and often distinct strategies are combined to maximize efficacy and minimize side effects. In this review, we will discuss the importance of apoptosis, necrosis, and mitotic catastrophe in the response of tumor cells to the most common clinically employed and experimental anticancer agents

Trial watch: Chemotherapy with immunogenic cell death inducers

The long-established notion that apoptosis would be immunologically silent, and hence it would go unnoticed by the immune system, if not tolerogenic, and hence it would actively suppress immune responses, has recently been revisited. In some instances, indeed, cancer cells undergo apoptosis while emitting a spatiotemporally-defined combination of signals that renders them capable of eliciting a long-term protective antitumor immune response. Importantly, only a few anticancer agents can stimulate such an immunogenic cell death. These include cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and oxaliplatin, which are currently approved by FDA for the treatment of multiple hematologic and solid malignancies, as well as mitoxantrone, which is being used in cancer therapy and against multiple sclerosis. In this Trial Watch, we will review and discuss the progress of recent (initiated after January 2008) clinical trials evaluating the off-label use of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, oxaliplatin and mitoxantrone

Organs on chip approach: A tool to evaluate cancer-immune cells interactions

In this paper we discuss the applicability of numerical descriptors and statistical physics concepts to characterize complex biological systems observed at microscopic level through organ on chip approach. To this end, we employ data collected on a micro uidic platform in which leukocytes can move through suitably built channels toward their target. Leukocyte behavior is recorded by standard time lapse imaging. In particular, we analyze three groups of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC): heterozygous mutants (in which only one copy of the FPR1 gene is normal), homozygous mutants (in which both alleles encoding FPR1 are loss-of-function variants) and cells from ‘wild type’ donors (with normal expression of FPR1). We characterize the migration of these cells providing a quantitative con rmation of the essential role of FPR1 in cancer chemotherapy response. Indeed wild type PBMC perform biased random walks toward chemotherapy-treated cancer cells establishing persistent interactions with them. Conversely, heterozygous mutants present a weaker bias in their motion and homozygous mutants perform rather uncorrelated random walks, both failing to engage with their targets. We next focus on wild type cells and study the interactions of leukocytes with cancerous cells developing a novel heuristic procedure, inspired by Lyapunov stability in dynamical systems

Trial Watch: Adoptive cell transfer immunotherapy

During the last two decades, several approaches for the activation of the immune system against cancer have been developed. These include rather unselective maneuvers such as the systemic administration of immunostimulatory agents (e.g., interleukin-2) as well as targeted interventions, encompassing highly specific monoclonal antibodies, vaccines and cell-based therapies. Among the latter, adoptive cell transfer (ACT) involves the selection of autologous lymphocytes with antitumor activity, their expansion/activation ex vivo, and their reinfusion into the patient, often in the context of lymphodepleting regimens (to minimize endogenous immunosuppression). Such autologous cells can be isolated from tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes or generated by manipulating circulating lymphocytes for the expression of tumor-specific T-cell receptors. In addition, autologous lymphocytes can be genetically engineered to prolong their in vivo persistence, to boost antitumor responses and/or to minimize side effects. ACT has recently been shown to be associated with a consistent rate of durable regressions in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma patients and holds great promises in several other oncological settings. In this Trial Watch, we will briefly review the scientific rationale behind ACT and discuss the progress of recent clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of adoptive cell transfer as an anticancer therapy

Loss-of-function alleles of P2RX7 and TLR4 fail to affect the response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

The success of anticancer chemotherapy relies at least in part on the induction of an immune response against tumor cells. Thus, tumors growing on mice that lack the pattern recognition receptor TLR4 or the purinergic receptor P2RX7 fail to respond to chemotherapy with anthracyclins or oxaliplatin in conditions in which the same neoplasms growing on immunocompetent mice would do so. Similarly, the therapeutic efficacy (measured as progression-free survival) of adjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclins is reduced in breast cancer patients bearing loss-of-function alleles of TLR4 or P2RX7. TLR4 loss-of-function alleles also have a negative impact on the therapeutic outcome of oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer patients. Here, we report that loss-of-function TLR4 and P2RX7 alleles do not affect overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, irrespective of the administration and type of chemotherapy. The intrinsic characteristics of NSCLC (which near-to-always is chemoresistant and associated with poor prognosis) and/or the type of therapy that is employed to treat this malignancy (which near-to-always is based on cisplatin) may explain why two genes that affect the immune response to dying cells fail to influence the clinical progression of NSCLC patients

Prognostic impact of vitamin B6 metabolism in lung cancer

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are routinely treated with cytotoxic agents such as cisplatin. Through a genome-wide siRNA-based screen, we identified vitamin B6 metabolism as a central regulator of cisplatin responses in vitro and in vivo. By aggravating a bioenergetic catastrophe that involves the depletion of intracellular glutathione, vitamin B6 exacerbates cisplatin-mediated DNA damage, thus sensitizing a large panel of cancer cell lines to apoptosis. Moreover, vitamin B6 sensitizes cancer cells to apoptosis induction by distinct types of physical and chemical stress, including multiple chemotherapeutics. This effect requires pyridoxal kinase (PDXK), the enzyme that generates the bioactive form of vitamin B6. In line with a general role of vitamin B6 in stress responses, low PDXK expression levels were found to be associated with poor disease outcome in two independent cohorts of patients with NSCLC. These results indicate that PDXK expression levels constitute a biomarker for risk stratification among patients with NSCLC.publishedVersio

Consensus guidelines for the detection of immunogenic cell death

none82siApoptotic cells have long been considered as intrinsically tolerogenic or unable to elicit immune responses specific for dead cell-associated antigens. However, multiple stimuli can trigger a functionally peculiar type of apoptotic demise that does not go unnoticed by the adaptive arm of the immune system, which we named "immunogenic cell death" (ICD). ICD is preceded or accompanied by the emission of a series of immunostimulatory damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in a precise spatiotemporal configuration. Several anticancer agents that have been successfully employed in the clinic for decades, including various chemotherapeutics and radiotherapy, can elicit ICD. Moreover, defects in the components that underlie the capacity of the immune system to perceive cell death as immunogenic negatively influence disease outcome among cancer patients treated with ICD inducers. Thus, ICD has profound clinical and therapeutic implications. Unfortunately, the gold-standard approach to detect ICD relies on vaccination experiments involving immunocompetent murine models and syngeneic cancer cells, an approach that is incompatible with large screening campaigns. Here, we outline strategies conceived to detect surrogate markers of ICD in vitro and to screen large chemical libraries for putative ICD inducers, based on a high-content, high-throughput platform that we recently developed. Such a platform allows for the detection of multiple DAMPs, like cell surface-exposed calreticulin, extracellular ATP and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), and/or the processes that underlie their emission, such as endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy and necrotic plasma membrane permeabilization. We surmise that this technology will facilitate the development of next-generation anticancer regimens, which kill malignant cells and simultaneously convert them into a cancer-specific therapeutic vaccine.Kepp, Oliver; Senovilla, Laura; Vitale, Ilio; Vacchelli, Erika; Adjemian, Sandy; Agostinis, Patrizia; Apetoh, Lionel; Aranda, Fernando; Barnaba, Vincenzo; Bloy, Norma; Bracci, Laura; Breckpot, Karine; Brough, David; Buqué, Aitziber; Castro, Maria G; Cirone, Mara; Colombo, Maria I; Cremer, Isabelle; Demaria, Sandra; Dini, Luciana; Eliopoulos, Aristides G; Faggioni, Alberto; Formenti, Silvia C; Fučíková, Jitka; Gabriele, Lucia; Gaipl, Udo S; Galon, Jérôme; Garg, Abhishek; Ghiringhelli, François; Giese, Nathalia A; Guo, Zong Sheng; Hemminki, Akseli; Herrmann, Martin; Hodge, James W; Holdenrieder, Stefan; Honeychurch, Jamie; Hu, Hong-Min; Huang, Xing; Illidge, Tim M; Kono, Koji; Korbelik, Mladen; Krysko, Dmitri V; Loi, Sherene; Lowenstein, Pedro R; Lugli, Enrico; Ma, Yuting; Madeo, Frank; Manfredi, Angelo A; Martins, Isabelle; Mavilio, Domenico; Menger, Laurie; Merendino, Nicolò; Michaud, Michael; Mignot, Gregoire; Mossman, Karen L; Multhoff, Gabriele; Oehler, Rudolf; Palombo, Fabio; Panaretakis, Theocharis; Pol, Jonathan; Proietti, Enrico; Ricci, Jean-Ehrland; Riganti, Chiara; Rovere-Querini, Patrizia; Rubartelli, Anna; Sistigu, Antonella; Smyth, Mark J; Sonnemann, Juergen; Spisek, Radek; Stagg, John; Sukkurwala, Abdul Qader; Tartour, Eric; Thorburn, Andrew; Thorne, Stephen H; Vandenabeele, Peter; Velotti, Francesca; Workenhe, Samuel T; Yang, Haining; Zong, Wei-Xing; Zitvogel, Laurence; Kroemer, Guido; Galluzzi, LorenzoKepp, Oliver; Senovilla, Laura; Vitale, Ilio; Vacchelli, Erika; Adjemian, Sandy; Agostinis, Patrizia; Apetoh, Lionel; Aranda, Fernando; Barnaba, Vincenzo; Bloy, Norma; Bracci, Laura; Breckpot, Karine; Brough, David; Buqué, Aitziber; Castro, Maria G; Cirone, Mara; Colombo, Maria I; Cremer, Isabelle; Demaria, Sandra; Dini, Luciana; Eliopoulos, Aristides G; Faggioni, Alberto; Formenti, Silvia C; Fučíková, Jitka; Gabriele, Lucia; Gaipl, Udo S; Galon, Jérôme; Garg, Abhishek; Ghiringhelli, François; Giese, Nathalia A; Guo, Zong Sheng; Hemminki, Akseli; Herrmann, Martin; Hodge, James W; Holdenrieder, Stefan; Honeychurch, Jamie; Hu, Hong Min; Huang, Xing; Illidge, Tim M; Kono, Koji; Korbelik, Mladen; Krysko, Dmitri V; Loi, Sherene; Lowenstein, Pedro R; Lugli, Enrico; Ma, Yuting; Madeo, Frank; Manfredi, Angelo A; Martins, Isabelle; Mavilio, Domenico; Menger, Laurie; Merendino, Nicolò; Michaud, Michael; Mignot, Gregoire; Mossman, Karen L; Multhoff, Gabriele; Oehler, Rudolf; Palombo, Fabio; Panaretakis, Theocharis; Pol, Jonathan; Proietti, Enrico; Ricci, Jean Ehrland; Riganti, Chiara; Rovere Querini, Patrizia; Rubartelli, Anna; Sistigu, Antonella; Smyth, Mark J; Sonnemann, Juergen; Spisek, Radek; Stagg, John; Sukkurwala, Abdul Qader; Tartour, Eric; Thorburn, Andrew; Thorne, Stephen H; Vandenabeele, Peter; Velotti, Francesca; Workenhe, Samuel T; Yang, Haining; Zong, Wei Xing; Zitvogel, Laurence; Kroemer, Guido; Galluzzi, Lorenz

Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies

During the past decades, anticancer immunotherapy has evolved from a promising therapeutic option to a robust clinical reality. Many immunotherapeutic regimens are now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for use in cancer patients, and many others are being investigated as standalone therapeutic interventions or combined with conventional treatments in clinical studies. Immunotherapies may be subdivided into “passive” and “active” based on their ability to engage the host immune system against cancer. Since the anticancer activity of most passive immunotherapeutics (including tumor-targeting monoclonal antibodies) also relies on the host immune system, this classification does not properly reflect the complexity of the drug-host-tumor interaction. Alternatively, anticancer immunotherapeutics can be classified according to their antigen specificity. While some immunotherapies specifically target one (or a few) defined tumor-associated antigen(s), others operate in a relatively non-specific manner and boost natural or therapy-elicited anticancer immune responses of unknown and often broad specificity. Here, we propose a critical, integrated classification of anticancer immunotherapies and discuss the clinical relevance of these approaches

Rôle du profile immunogénétique des patientes dans la réponse à la chimiothérapie

L’efficacité de la chimiothérapie contre la croissance tumourale repose sur l'induction d'une mort des cellules tumourales dite immunogène. Les cellules tumourales mourantes agissent alors comme un vaccin thérapeutique en stimulant une réponse immunitaire anti-tumourale capable de contrôler, voire d'éliminer, les cellules cancéreuses résiduel. Les trois marqueurs principales de la mort cellulaire immunogène (MCI), sont (i) l'exposition pré-apoptotique de la calréticuline (CRT) à la surface des cellules, (ii) la sécrétion de l'ATP pendant l'apoptose qui dépend du processus d'autophagie, et (iii) le relargage post-apoptotique de la protéine non-histone de fixation à la chromatine HMGB1 (High Mobility Group B1). CRT, ATP et HMGB1 se lient respectivement à CD91, au récepteur purinergique P2RX7 (Purinergic Receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel 7) et au récepteur TLR4 (Toll-like Receptor 4) situés à la surface des cellules dendritiques. En retour, ces interactions initient respectivement la phagocytose des cellules mourantes, la production de l'interleukine-1β et la cross-présentation des antigènes tumouraux aux lymphocytes T.Notre laboratoire a précédemment démontré que la chimiothérapie adjuvante présente une efficacité réduite chez des patients atteints de cancers colorectaux et du sein portant un polymorphisme d'un seul nucléotide ou SNP (Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism) compromettent la fonction des gènes P2RX7 et TLR4, notamment rs3751143 (496Glu>Ala) pour le gène P2RX7 et rs4986790 (299Asp>Gly) pour le gène TLR4.Compte tenu des ces résultats que mettent en évidence la relation étroite entre l’efficacité de la chimiothérapie anticancéreuse et un système immunitaire opérationnel, nous avons décidé d'étudier l'effet de ces SNPs, soit sur la survie globale soit sur la survie sans événement, chez des patients atteints de cancer pulmonaire non à petites cellules ou NSCLC (Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma) et de cancers de la tête et du cou ou HNSCC (Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma). De plus, nous avons porté notre attention sur un autre SNP affectant le gène ATG16L1 (Autophagy-related 16-Like 1), notamment rs2241880 (300Thr>Ala) qui compromet l’activité d’un gène fondamental dans le processus d’autophagie.Dans les cancers NSCLC, les allèles mutants "perte de fonction" des gènes ATG16L1, P2RX7 et TLR4 n'affectent pas la survie globale, indépendamment du type de chimiothérapie administrée. Au contraire, les patientes atteintes de HNSCC, portant au moins un allèle "perte de fonction" d’ATG16L1 et TLR4, présentent un taux de survie sans récidive inferieure par rapport aux patients qui présentent un genotype sauvage. Ce travail décrit pour la première fois un biomarqueur prognostique pour ce type de cancer.De plus, nous avons pu définir, par génotypage à haut débit, une signature de SNPs prédictive de la réponse à la chimiothérapie neoadjuvantes à base d'anthracyclines et des taxanes chez les patients atteints de cancer du sein. En particulier, la combinaison des deux paramètres clinicopathologiques classiques (âge lors du diagnostic et récepteur aux œstrogènes) avec les génotypes rs1076669 du gène ECE1 (Endothelin Converting Enzyme 1; 341Thr>Ile) et rs2277413 du gène PZP (Pregnancy-Zone Protein; 813Val>Ala) a permis de définir trois grandes catégories des patients et leur probabilité respective d'atteindre la réponse complète pathologique après traitement.L'identification de nouveaux biomarqueurs associés à une absence/diminution de réponse à la chimiothérapie apparaît critique pour choisir des alternatives thérapeutiques appropriées et éviter les effets secondaires indésirables chez les non-répondeurs.Successful chemotherapeutics can induce a type of tumour cell death that is immunogenic, implying that patient’s dying cancer cells function as a therapeutic vaccine and elicit an anti-tumour immune response that controls the residual disease. The three main hallmarks of immunogenic cell death (ICD) are the pre-apoptotic exposure of calreticulin (CRT) on the cell surface, the autophagy-dependent secretion of ATP during the blebbing phase of apoptosis and the post-apoptotic release of the chromatin-binding non-histone protein high mobility group B1 (HMGB1). CRT, ATP and HMGB1 interact with CD91, purinergic receptor P2X, ligand-gated ion channel, 7 (P2RX7) and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), respectively, on the surface of dendritic cells (DCs), thus promoting the engulfment of dying cells, the production of IL-1β and the cross-presentation of tumour-associated antigens to T cells, respectively.Our laboratory has demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy exhibits a reduced efficacy in breast and colorectal cancer patients bearing single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that compromise the function of P2RX7 or TLR4, such as rs3751143 in P2RX7 (Glu496Ala) and rs4986790 in TLR4 (Asp299Gly).Driven by these results, underpinning the intimate relationship between the success of anti-cancer chemotherapy and an operational immune system, we decided to investigate the effect of these SNPs on disease outcome among non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. Additionally, we focused our attention on a SNP in autophagy related 16-like 1 (ATG16L1), namely rs2241880 (Thr300Ala), which compromises the activity of one pivotal autophagic gene. In NSCLC patients, loss-of-function ATG16L1, P2RX7 and TLR4 alleles do not affect overall survival, irrespective of the administration and type of chemotherapy. Conversely, HNSCC patients bearing at least one loss-of-function ATG16L1 or TLR4 allele exhibit a reduced disease-free survival when compared to their wild-type counterparts. This is the first report highlighting a putative prognostic biomarker for this malignancy. Furthermore, taking advantage of a high throughput genotyping study, we delineated a SNP-based signature that predicts the response of breast cancer patients to anthracycline- and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Particularly, the combination of two classical clinicophatological parameters (age at diagnosis and estrogen receptor) and genotype at the ECE1 (rs1076669 Thr341Ile) and PZP (rs2277413 Val813Ala) loci allowed us to define three broad categories with a correspondent probability of achieving pathological complete response. The identification of new biomarkers associated with a reduced/absent response to chemotherapy appears critical for selecting appropriate therapeutic alternatives, and avoiding undesired side effects among non-responders