3 research outputs found

    A methodology pruning the search space of six compiler transformations by addressing them together as one problem and by exploiting the hardware architecture details

    Get PDF
    Today’s compilers have a plethora of optimizations-transformations to choose from, and the correct choice, order as well parameters of transformations have a significant/large impact on performance; choosing the correct order and parameters of optimizations has been a long standing problem in compilation research, which until now remains unsolved; the separate sub-problems optimization gives a different schedule/binary for each sub-problem and these schedules cannot coexist, as by refining one degrades the other. Researchers try to solve this problem by using iterative compilation techniques but the search space is so big that it cannot be searched even by using modern supercomputers. Moreover, compiler transformations do not take into account the hardware architecture details and data reuse in an efficient way. In this paper, a new iterative compilation methodology is presented which reduces the search space of six compiler transformations by addressing the above problems; the search space is reduced by many orders of magnitude and thus an efficient solution is now capable to be found. The transformations are the following: loop tiling (including the number of the levels of tiling), loop unroll, register allocation, scalar replacement, loop interchange and data array layouts. The search space is reduced (a) by addressing the aforementioned transformations together as one problem and not separately, (b) by taking into account the custom hardware architecture details (e.g., cache size and associativity) and algorithm characteristics (e.g., data reuse). The proposed methodology has been evaluated over iterative compilation and gcc/icc compilers, on both embedded and general purpose processors; it achieves significant performance gains at many orders of magnitude lower compilation time

    A high-performance matrix-matrix multiplication methodology for CPU and GPU architectures

    Get PDF
    Current compilers cannot generate code that can compete with hand-tuned code in efficiency, even for a simple kernel like matrix–matrix multiplication (MMM). A key step in program optimization is the estimation of optimal values for parameters such as tile sizes and number of levels of tiling. The scheduling parameter values selection is a very difficult and time-consuming task, since parameter values depend on each other; this is why they are found by using searching methods and empirical techniques. To overcome this problem, the scheduling sub-problems must be optimized together, as one problem and not separately. In this paper, an MMM methodology is presented where the optimum scheduling parameters are found by decreasing the search space theoretically, while the major scheduling sub-problems are addressed together as one problem and not separately according to the hardware architecture parameters and input size; for different hardware architecture parameters and/or input sizes, a different implementation is produced. This is achieved by fully exploiting the software characteristics (e.g., data reuse) and hardware architecture parameters (e.g., data caches sizes and associativities), giving high-quality solutions and a smaller search space. This methodology refers to a wide range of CPU and GPU architectures

    A Methodology for Speeding up MVM for Regular, Toeplitz and Bisymmetric Toeplitz Matrices

    No full text
    The Matrix Vector Multiplication algorithm is an important kernel in most varied domains and application areas and the performance of its implementations highly depends on the memory utilization and data locality. In this paper, a new methodology for MVM including different types of matrices, i.e. Regular, Toeplitz and Bisymmetric Toeplitz, is presented in detail. This methodology achieves higher execution speed than the software state of the art library, ATLAS (speedup from 1.2 up to 4.4), and other conventional software implementations, for both general (SIMD unit is used) and embedded processors. This is achieved by fully and simultaneously exploiting the combination of software and hardware parameters as one problem and not separately
    corecore