ATR-16 syndrome: Mechanisms linking monosomy to phenotype

Background: Deletions removing 100s-1000s kb of DNA, and variable numbers of poorly characterised genes, are often found in patients with a wide range of developmental abnormalities. In such cases, understanding the contribution of the deletion to an individual's clinical phenotype is challenging. Methods: Here, as an example of this common phenomenon, we analysed 41 patients with simple deletions of ∼177 to ∼2000 kb affecting one allele of the well-characterised, gene dense, distal region of chromosome 16 (16p13.3), referred to as ATR-16 syndrome. We characterised deletion extents and screened for genetic background effects, telomere position effect and compensatory upregulation of hemizygous genes. Results: We find the risk of developmental and neurological abnormalities arises from much smaller distal chromosome 16 deletions (∼400 kb) than previously reported. Beyond this, the severity of ATR-16 syndrome increases with deletion size, but there is no evidence that critical regions determine the developmental abnormalities associated with this disorder. Surprisingly, we find no evidence of telomere position effect or compensatory upregulation of hemizygous genes; however, genetic background effects substantially modify phenotypic abnormalities. Conclusions: Using ATR-16 as a general model of disorders caused by CNVs, we show the degree to which individuals with contiguous gene syndromes are affected is not simply related to the number of genes deleted but depends on their genetic background. We also show there is no critical region defining the degree of phenotypic abnormalities in ATR-16 syndrome and this has important implications for genetic counselling. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ

ATR-16 syndrome: mechanisms linking monosomy to phenotype

BackgroundDeletions removing 100s-1000s kb of DNA, and variable numbers of poorly characterised genes, are often found in patients with a wide range of developmental abnormalities. In such cases, understanding the contribution of the deletion to an individual's clinical phenotype is challenging.MethodsHere, as an example of this common phenomenon, we analysed 41 patients with simple deletions of similar to 177 to similar to 2000 kb affecting one allele of the well-characterised, gene dense, distal region of chromosome 16 (16p13.3), referred to as ATR-16 syndrome. We characterised deletion extents and screened for genetic background effects, telomere position effect and compensatory upregulation of hemizygous genes.ResultsWe find the risk of developmental and neurological abnormalities arises from much smaller distal chromosome 16 deletions (similar to 400 kb) than previously reported. Beyond this, the severity of ATR-16 syndrome increases with deletion size, but there is no evidence that critical regions determine the developmental abnormalities associated with this disorder. Surprisingly, we find no evidence of telomere position effect or compensatory upregulation of hemizygous genes; however, genetic background effects substantially modify phenotypic abnormalities.ConclusionsUsing ATR-16 as a general model of disorders caused by CNVs, we show the degree to which individuals with contiguous gene syndromes are affected is not simply related to the number of genes deleted but depends on their genetic background. We also show there is no critical region defining the degree of phenotypic abnormalities in ATR-16 syndrome and this has important implications for genetic counselling.Genetics of disease, diagnosis and treatmen

Validation and pilot application of [ 18F]FDG-PET in evaluation of a metabolic therapy for Alzheimer's disease

Here we describe methods for application of quantitative fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([ 18F]FDG-PET) measures of brain glucose metabolism in multi-centre clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease. We validated methods and demonstrated their use in the context of a treatment trial with the PPARγ agonist Rosiglitazone XR versus placebo in mild to moderate AD patients. Novel quantitative indices related to the combined forward rate constant for [ 18F]FDG uptake $({K}-{i}^{index})$ and to the rate of cerebral glucose utilization $(CM{R}-{glu}^{index})$ were applied. Active treatment was associated with a sustained but not statistically significant trend from the first month for higher mean values in both. However, neither these nor another analytical approach recently validated using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative suggested that active treatment decreased the progression of decline in brain glucose metabolism. Rates of brain atrophy were similar between active and placebo groups and measures of cognition also did not demonstrate clear group differences. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of using [ 18F]FDG-PET as part of a multi-centre therapeutics trial and describes new measures that can be employed. It suggests that Rosiglitazone is associated with an early increase in whole brain glucose utilisation, but not with any biological or clinical evidence for slowing progression over the period of study in the selected patient group

A Multi-Center Randomized Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trial Applying [18F]FDG-PET for Evaluation of Metabolic Therapy with Rosiglitazone XR in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

Here we report the first multi-center clinical trial in Alzheimer's disease (AD) using fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET) measures of brain glucose metabolism as the primary outcome. We contrasted effects of 12 months treatment with the PPARγ agonist Rosiglitazone XR versus placebo in 80 mild to moderate AD patients. Secondary objectives included testing for reduction in the progression of brain atrophy and improvement in cognition. Active treatment was associated with a sustained but not statistically significant trend from the first month for higher mean values in Kiindex and CMRgluindex, novel quantitative indices related to the combined forward rate constant for [18F]FDG uptake and to the rate of cerebral glucose utilization, respectively. However, neither these nor another analytical approach recently validated using data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative indicated that active treatment decreased the progression of decline in brain glucose metabolism. Rates of brain atrophy were similar between active and placebo groups and measures of cognition also did not suggest clear group differences. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of using [18F]FDG-PET as part of a multi-center therapeutics trial. It suggests that Rosiglitazone is associated with an early increase in whole brain glucose metabolism, but not with any biological or clinical evidence for slowing progression over a 1 year follow up in the symptomatic stages of AD