56 research outputs found

    B→D∗∗B\to D^{\ast\ast} semileptonic decay in covariant quark models \`a la Bakamjian Thomas

    Full text link
    Once chosen the dynamics in one frame, for example the rest frame, the Bakamjian and Thomas method allows to define relativistic quark models in any frame. These models have been shown to provide, in the heavy quark limit, fully covariant current form factors as matrix elements of the quark current operator. They also verify the Isgur-Wise scaling and give a slope parameter ρ2>3/4\rho^2>3/4 for all the possible choices of the dynamics. In this paper we study the L=1L=1 excited states and derive the general formula, valid for any dynamics, for the scaling invariant form factors τ1/2(n)(w)\tau_{1/2}^{(n)}(w) and τ3/2(n)(w)\tau_{3/2}^{(n)}(w). We also check the Bjorken-Isgur-Wise sum rule already demonstrated elsewhere in this class of models.Comment: 14 pages, Latex2e, AMS-LaTe

    On P-wave meson decay constants in the heavy quark limit of QCD

    Get PDF
    In previous work it has been shown that, either from a sum rule for the subleading Isgur-Wise function Ο3(1)\xi_3(1) or from a combination of Uraltsev and Bjorken SR, one infers for PP-wave states âˆŁÏ„1/2(1)∣â‰ȘâˆŁÏ„3/2(1)∣|\tau_{1/2}(1)| \ll |\tau_{3/2}(1)|. This implies, in the heavy quark limit of QCD, a hierarchy for the {\it production} rates of PP-states Γ(Bˉd→D(12)â„“Îœ)â‰ȘΓ(Bˉd→D(32)â„“Îœ)\Gamma(\bar{B}_d \to D ({1 \over 2}) \ell \nu) \ll \Gamma(\bar{B}_d \to D ({3 \over 2}) \ell \nu) that seems at present to be contradicted by experiment. It was also shown that the decay constants of j=32j = {3 \over 2} PP-states vanish in the heavy quark limit of QCD, f3/2(n)=0f_{3/2}^{(n)} = 0. Assuming the {\it model} of factorization in the decays Bˉd→Dˉs∗∗D\bar{B}_d \to \bar{D}_s^{**}D, one expects the opposite hierarchy for the {\it emission} rates Γ(Bˉd→Dˉs(32)D)â‰ȘΓ(Bˉd→Dˉs(12)D)\Gamma(\bar{B}_d \to \bar{D}_s ({3 \over 2}) D) \ll \Gamma(\bar{B}_d \to \bar{D}_s ({1 \over 2}) D), since j=12j = {1 \over 2} PP-states are coupled to vacuum. Moreover, using Bjorken SR and previously discovered SR involving heavy-light meson decay constants and IW functions, one can prove that the sums ∑n(f(n)f(0))2\sum\limits_n ({f^{(n)} \over f^{(0)}})^2, ∑n(f1/2(n)f(0))2\sum\limits_n ({f_{1/2}^{(n)} \over f^{(0)}})^2 (where f(n)f^{(n)} and f1/2(n)f_{1/2}^{(n)} are the decay constants of SS-states and j=12j = {1\over 2} PP-states) are divergent. This situation seems to be realized in the relativistic quark models \`a la Bakamjian and Thomas, that satisfy HQET and predict decays constants f(n)f^{(n)} and f1/2(n)f_{1/2}^{(n)} that do not decrease with the radial quantum number nn.Comment: 7 pages, Late

    RQM description of the charge form factor of the pion and its asymptotic behavior

    Full text link
    The pion charge and scalar form factors, F1(Q2)F_1(Q^2) and F0(Q2)F_0(Q^2), are first calculated in different forms of relativistic quantum mechanics. This is done using the solution of a mass operator that contains both confinement and one-gluon-exchange interactions. Results of calculations, based on a one-body current, are compared to experiment for the first one. As it could be expected, those point-form, and instant and front-form ones in a parallel momentum configuration fail to reproduce experiment. The other results corresponding to a perpendicular momentum configuration (instant form in the Breit frame and front form with q+=0q^+=0) do much better. The comparison of charge and scalar form factors shows that the spin-1/2 nature of the constituents plays an important role. Taking into account that only the last set of results represents a reasonable basis for improving the description of the charge form factor, this one is then discussed with regard to the asymptotic QCD-power-law behavior Q−2Q^{-2}. The contribution of two-body currents in achieving the right power law is considered while the scalar form factor, F0(Q2)F_0(Q^2), is shown to have the right power-law behavior in any case. The low-Q2Q^2 behavior of the charge form factor and the pion-decay constant are also discussed.}Comment: 30 pages, 10 figure

    Unitarity and the Bethe-Salpeter Equation

    Full text link
    We investigate the relation between different three-dimensional reductions of the Bethe-Salpeter equation and the analytic structure of the resultant amplitudes in the energy plane. This correlation is studied for both the ϕ2σ\phi^2\sigma interaction Lagrangian and the πN\pi N system with ss-, uu-, and tt-channel pole diagrams as driving terms. We observe that the equal-time equation, which includes some of the three-body unitarity cuts, gives the best agreement with the Bethe-Salpeter result. This is followed by other 3-D approximations that have less of the analytic structure.Comment: 17 pages, 8 figures; RevTeX. Version accepted for publication in Phys. Rev.

    Sum rules in the heavy quark limit of QCD

    Full text link
    In the leading order of the heavy quark expansion, we propose a method within the OPE and the trace formalism, that allows to obtain, in a systematic way, Bjorken-like sum rules for the derivatives of the elastic Isgur-Wise function Ο(w)\xi(w) in terms of corresponding Isgur-Wise functions of transitions to excited states. A key element is the consideration of the non-forward amplitude, as introduced by Uraltsev. A simplifying feature of our method is to consider currents aligned along the initial and final four-velocities. As an illustration, we give a very simple derivation of Bjorken and Uraltsev sum rules. On the other hand, we obtain a new class of sum rules that involve the products of IW functions at zero recoil and IW functions at any ww. Special care is given to the needed derivation of the projector on the polarization tensors of particles of arbitrary integer spin. The new sum rules give further information on the slope ρ2=−Οâ€Č(1)\rho^2 = - \xi '(1) and also on the curvature σ2=Οâ€Čâ€Č(1)\sigma^2 = \xi '' (1), and imply, modulo a very natural assumption, the inequality σ2≄54ρ2\sigma^2 \geq {5\over 4} \rho^2, and therefore the absolute bound σ2≄1516\sigma^2 \geq {15 \over 16}.Comment: 64 pages, Late

    Rotational covariance and light-front current matrix elements

    Full text link
    Light-front current matrix elements for elastic scattering from hadrons with spin~1 or greater must satisfy a nontrivial constraint associated with the requirement of rotational covariance for the current operator. Using a model ρ\rho meson as a prototype for hadronic quark models, this constraint and its implications are studied at both low and high momentum transfers. In the kinematic region appropriate for asymptotic QCD, helicity rules, together with the rotational covariance condition, yield an additional relation between the light-front current matrix elements.Comment: 16 pages, [no number

    Comparison of Relativistic Nucleon-Nucleon Interactions

    Get PDF
    We investigate the difference between those relativistic models based on interpreting a realistic nucleon-nucleon interaction as a perturbation of the square of a relativistic mass operator and those models that use the method of Kamada and Gl\"ockle to construct an equivalent interaction to add to the relativistic mass operator. Although both models reproduce the phase shifts and binding energy of the corresponding non-relativistic model, they are not scattering equivalent. The example of elastic electron-deuteron scattering in the one-photon-exchange approximation is used to study the sensitivity of three-body observables to these choices. Our conclusion is that the differences in the predictions of the two models can be understood in terms of the different ways in which the relativistic and non-relativistic SS-matrices are related. We argue that the mass squared method is consistent with conventional procedures used to fit the Lorentz-invariant cross section as a function of the laboratory energy.Comment: Revtex 13 pages, 5 figures, corrected some typo

    Quantum Monte Carlo Studies of Relativistic Effects in Light Nuclei

    Get PDF
    Relativistic Hamiltonians are defined as the sum of relativistic one-body kinetic energy, two- and three-body potentials and their boost corrections. In this work we use the variational Monte Carlo method to study two kinds of relativistic effects in the binding energy of 3H and 4He. The first is due to the nonlocalities in the relativistic kinetic energy and relativistic one-pion exchange potential (OPEP), and the second is from boost interaction. The OPEP contribution is reduced by about 15% by the relativistic nonlocality, which may also have significant effects on pion exchange currents. However, almost all of this reduction is canceled by changes in the kinetic energy and other interaction terms, and the total effect of the nonlocalities on the binding energy is very small. The boost interactions, on the other hand, give repulsive contributions of 0.4 (1.9) MeV in 3H (4He) and account for 37% of the phenomenological part of the three-nucleon interaction needed in the nonrelativistic Hamiltonians.Comment: 33 pages, RevTeX, 11 PostScript figures, submitted to Physical Review

    Baryon Current Matrix Elements in a Light-Front Framework

    Full text link
    Current matrix elements and observables for electro- and photo-excitation of baryons from the nucleon are studied in a light-front framework. Relativistic effects are estimated by comparison to a nonrelativistic model, where we use simple basis states to represent the baryon wavefunctions. Sizeable relativistic effects are found for certain transitions, for example, to radial excitations such as that conventionally used to describe to the Roper resonance. A systematic study shows that the violation of rotational covariance of the baryon transition matrix elements stemming from the use of one-body currents is generally small.Comment: 32 pages, LaTeX, 10 postscript figures, uses epsf.sty; figures uuencoded with uufiles (or available by request in .ps or hardcopy form
    • 

    corecore