5 research outputs found
Simple does not mean poor: grasslands and forests harbor similar ant species richness and distinct composition in highlands of southern Brazil
Several studies addressed ant communities in the dense Atlantic Forest that runs along the Brazilian coast.
However, comparatively little is known about the mixed forests and grasslands that occur in the southern range
of the Atlantic Forest domain. In this study we performed the first standardized assessment of ants in the forest-
grassland mosaic found in the highlands of the state of Santa Catarina. We aimed to investigate and compare ant
richness and composition between mixed forests and grasslands in the main mountain range of south Brazil. Ants
were collected in two years with ground pitfalls, tree pitfalls and litter samples. Sixty ant species were recorded,
resulting in 22 new records for âPlanalto Serranoâ region and three for the state of Santa Catarina:
Eurhopalothrix
depressa
,
Pheidole radoszkowskii
and
Wasmannia williamsoni
. There was significant dissimilarity in ant species
composition between grasslands and forests, but no difference in ant species richness, even considering the
higher number of strata in mixed forests. Similar richness and low number of arboreal species suggest that this
ant community is structured similarly to temperate ones. Both habitats presented a large proportion of exclusive
species. The fact that species composition between grassland and forest areas differed, coupled with the similarity
in species richness between habitats and the record of new ant species for the region, calls for strong conservation
efforts in grasslands of southern Brazil, which still are little protected by conservation areas
Ant diversity decreases during the dry season:A meta-analysis of the effects of seasonality on ant richness and abundance
Tropical studies traditionally describe insect diversity variation throughout the year. The temporally structured responses of insect assemblages to climate seasonality vary across ecosystems due to gradients of resource availability and limiting ecological factors. These idiosyncratic responses might be particularly true across the vast geographical range of the Brazilian territory, including various environments that harbor one of the most diverse ant faunas worldwide. This study addressed the relationship between ant diversity and climatic seasonality, performing a quantitative review of the published data on ant diversity collected in Brazil. We investigated the seasonality effect on ant abundance and richness described in the literature in 47 papers published between 2000 and 2018. These studies were developed mainly in the Atlantic Forest biome and collected ants with pitfall traps on the soil/litter stratum. We initially carried out a vote-counting procedure by comparing the number of significant results describing seasonal differences in the ant assemblage. We found that most papers described a similar pattern of ant abundance, richness, and species composition between seasons. However, when we performed a meta-analysis, we observed a clear pattern of higher ant abundance and richness in the wet/summer season compared with the dry/winter season. Our meta-analysis reveals that the ant diversity decreases in the dry season, strongly in the Cerrado biome. Additionally, we point out differences in the sampling effort across biomes, indicating the need for further investments in studies focused on temporal diversity patterns, including seasonal effects, on the insect assemblage in biomes less investigated so far. Abstract in Portuguese is available with online material
From species descriptions to diversity patterns:The validation of taxonomic data as a keystone for ant diversity studies reproducibility and accuracy
Research findings in natural sciences need to be comparable and reproducible to effectively improve our understanding of ecological and behavioural patterns. In this sense, knowledge frontiers in biodiversity studies are directly tied to taxonomic research, especially in species-rich tropical regions. Here we analysed the taxonomic information available in 470 studies on Brazilian ant diversity published in the last 50 years. We aimed to quantify the proportion of studies that provide enough data to validate taxonomic identification, explore the frequency of studies that properly acknowledge their taxonomic background, and investigate the primary resources for ant identification in Brazil. We found that most studies on Brazilian ant diversity (73.6%) explicitly stated the methods used to identify their specimens. However, the proportion of papers that provide complete data for the repository institutions and vouchered specimens is vanishingly small (5.8%). Additionally, only 40.0% of the studies consistently presented taxon authorities and years of description, rarely referencing taxonomic publications correctly. In turn, the number of specialists and institutions consulted for ant identification in Brazil has increased in the last years, along with the number of studies that explicitly provide their taxonomic procedures for ant identification. Our findings highlight a shift between generations regarding the recognition of taxonomy as fundamental science, deepening our understanding of biodiversity