521 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
To split or not to split: Capital allocation with convex risk measures
Convex risk measures were introduced by Deprez and Gerber (1985). Here the problem of allocating risk capital to subportfolios is addressed, when aggregate capital is calculated by a convex risk measure. The Aumann-Shapley value is proposed as an appropriate allocation mechanism. Distortion-exponential measures are discussed extensively and explicit capital allocation formulas are obtained for the case that the risk measure belongs to this family. Finally the implications of capital allocation with a convex risk measure for the stability of portfolios are discussed
Recommended from our members
Making a Market for Acts of God: The Practice of Risk-Trading in the Global Reinsurance Industry
Recommended from our members
Risk measures and economic capital for (re)insurers
This contribution relates to the use of risk measures for determining (re)insurers’ economic capital requirements. Alternative sets of properties of risk measures are discussed. Furthermore, methods for constructing risk measures via indifference arguments, representation results and re-weighting of probability distributions are presented. It is shown how these different approaches relate to popular risk measures, such as VaR, Expected Shortfall, distortion risk measures and the exponential premium principle. The problem of allocating aggregate economic capital to sub-portfolios (e.g. insurers’ lines of business) is then considered, with particular emphasis on marginal-cost-type methods. The relationship between insurance pricing and capital allocation is briefly discussed, based on concepts such as the opportunity and frictional costs of capital and the impact of the potential of default on insurance rates
Recommended from our members
Modelling: The elephant in the room
In an insurance world preoccupied with Solvency II, internal models have increased in both complexity and business significance. Nonetheless, actuaries are painfully aware of models’ limitations in representing the economic world, not least because of their reliance on often arbitrary assumptions. It is commonplace to say “all models are wrong but some are useful”. But in what sense might an internal model be wrong? If a model is wrong, how can it be useful? Significantly, what incentives does regulation produce for model development and use
Recommended from our members
The Model Ajar: Building Rationality Infrastructures within Insurance Organizations
Optimal capital allocation principles.
This paper develops a unifying framework for allocating the aggregate capital of a financial firm to its business units. The approach relies on an optimisation argument, requiring that the weighted sum of measures for the deviations of the business unit’s losses from their respective allocated capitals be minimised. This enables the association of alternative allocation rules to specific decision criteria and thus provides the risk manager with flexibility to meet specific target objectives. The underlying general framework reproduces many capital allocation methods that have appeared in the literature and allows for several possible extensions. An application to an insurance market with policyholder protection is additionally provided as an illustration.
Optimal capital allocation principles
This paper develops a unifying framework for allocating the aggregate capital of a financial firm to its business units. The approach relies on an optimisation argument, requiring that the weighted sum of measures for the deviations of the business unit’s losses from their respective allocated capitals be minimised. This enables the association of alternative allocation rules to specific decision criteria and thus provides the risk manager with flexibility to meet specific target objectives. The underlying general framework reproduces many capital allocation methods that have appeared in the literature and allows for several possible extensions. An application to an insurance market with policyholder protection is additionally provided as an illustration.Capital allocation; risk measure; comonotonicity; Euler allocation; default option; Lloyd’s of London
Recommended from our members
High dimensional modelling and simulation with asymmetric normal mixtures
A family of multivariate distributions, based on asymmetric normal mixtures, is introduced in order to model the dependence among insurance and financial risks. The model allows for straight-forward parameterisation via a correlation matrix and enables the modelling of radially asymmetric dependence structures, which are often of interest in risk management applications. Dependence is characterised by showing that increases in correlation values produce models which are ordered in the supermodular order sense. Explicit expressions for the Spearman and Kendall rank correlation coefficients are derived to enable calibration in a copula framework. The model is adapted to simulation in very high dimensions by using Kronecker products, enabling specification of a correlation matrix and an increase in computational spee
Recommended from our members
Parameter Uncertainty in Exponential Family Tail Estimation
Actuaries are often faced with the task of estimating tails of loss distributions from just a few observations. Thus estimates of tail probabilities (reinsurance prices) and percentiles (solvency capital requirements) are typically subject to substantial parameter uncertainty. We study the bias and MSE of estimators of tail probabilities and percentiles, with focus on 1-parameter exponential families. Using asymptotic arguments it is shown that tail estimates are subject to significant positive bias. Moreover, the use of bootstrap predictive distributions, which has been proposed in the actuarial literature as a way of addressing parameter uncertainty, is seen to double the estimation bias. A bias corrected estimator is thus proposed. It is then shown that the MSE of the MLE, the parametric bootstrap and the bias corrected estimators only differ in terms of order O(n −2), which provides decision-makers with some flexibility as to which estimator to use. The accuracy of asymptotic methods, even for small samples, is demonstrated exactly for the exponential and related distributions, while other 1-parameter distributions are considered in a simulation study. We argue that the presence of positive bias may be desirable in solvency capital calculations, though not necessarily in pricing problems
- …