Avaliação da força muscular inspiratória (PImáx) durante o desmame da ventilação mecânica em pacientes neurológicos internados na unidade de terapia intensiva

A ventilação mecânica, freqüentemente necessária em pacientes em estado crítico, pode ser associada à perda de força muscular respiratória por diversos mecanismos. Nosso objetivo foi avaliar a progressão da força da musculatura respiratória durante o processo de desmame, por mensuração seriada da PImáx até a independência completa da ventilação mecânica em pacientes neurológicos. A PImáx foi avaliada evolutivamente, uma vez ao dia, durante todo o período de desmame, com auxílio de manovacuômetro e válvula unidirecional. Foram incluídos no estudo 31 pacientes neurológicos (pós acidente vascular ou trauma crânio-encefálico) em desmame ventilatório e os valores obtidos foram comparados aos previstos, segundo Black e Hyatt. A média de PImáx inicial (primeiro dia do desmame) foi - 40,0±20,0 cmH2O (39% do previsto) (pMechanical ventilation, often needed in critically ill patients, may be associated to loss of respiratory muscular force due to several mechanisms. The objective was to assess the progression of respiratory muscular force during weaning from mechanical ventilation by using serial measurement of maximum inspiratory pressure until complete discontinuation in neurological patients. The PImax was progressively assessed by using manovacuometer and unidirectional valve once a day during the whole period of mechanical ventilation weaning. Thirty-one neurological patients (after stroke or craniocerebral trauma) undergoing weaning from mechanical ventilation were included for study, and the values obtained were compared to those established by Black and Hyatt. The initial mean PImax (first day of weaning) was - 40.0±20.0 cmH2O (39% of the expected value) (p < 0.05), reaching 50% at day 5 and 60% at day 10. It was observed an increase of 21% (p < 0.05) between the first and tenth days. On the 13th day, mechanical ventilation had been completely discontinued in all patients. Therefore a progressive evaluation of the inspiratory muscular force in patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation shows that the complete discontinuation is possible in neurological patients with 72% of the established values

Intensive care of the cancer patient: recent achievements and remaining challenges

A few decades have passed since intensive care unit (ICU) beds have been available for critically ill patients with cancer. Although the initial reports showed dismal prognosis, recent data suggest that an increased number of patients with solid and hematological malignancies benefit from intensive care support, with dramatically decreased mortality rates. Advances in the management of the underlying malignancies and support of organ dysfunctions have led to survival gains in patients with life-threatening complications from the malignancy itself, as well as infectious and toxic adverse effects related to the oncological treatments. In this review, we will appraise the prognostic factors and discuss the overall perspective related to the management of critically ill patients with cancer. The prognostic significance of certain factors has changed over time. For example, neutropenia or autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) have less adverse prognostic implications than two decades ago. Similarly, because hematologists and oncologists select patients for ICU admission based on the characteristics of the malignancy, the underlying malignancy rarely influences short-term survival after ICU admission. Since the recent data do not clearly support the benefit of ICU support to unselected critically ill allogeneic BMT recipients, more outcome research is needed in this subgroup. Because of the overall increased survival that has been reported in critically ill patients with cancer, we outline an easy-to-use and evidence-based ICU admission triage criteria that may help avoid depriving life support to patients with cancer who can benefit. Lastly, we propose a research agenda to address unanswered questions

Comparison of five clinical weaning indices

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive data acquired in the area of weaning, clinicians still struggle with the questions of how and when to begin the process. Clinical weaning indices, designed to predict weaning potential, are often difficult to use. They provide an answer at a specific time; extrapolation to the weaning process is rarely possible. No single index has proven to be superior. OBJECTIVES: To test the efficacy of five clinical weaning indices (Burns Weaning Assessment Program; Weaning Index; frequency tidal volume ratio; compliance, resistance, oxygenation and pressure index; and negative inspiratory pressure) at regular intervals during withdrawal of ventilatory support and to determine threshold levels for the program. METHODS: A prospective convenience sample consisted of 37 adult critical care patients requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 7 days and identified as stable and ready to wean. Data were collected on all weaning indices every other day until the patient was weaned. RESULTS: With the exception of the Burns Weaning Assessment Program, weaning indices did not change significantly from preweaning scores. Furthermore, the results failed to demonstrate that any of the five clinical weaning indices have strong predictive power related to weaning trial outcomes, although all the indices had negative predictive values that may be helpful in predicting unsuccessful weaning trials. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the process of weaning may be enhanced by comprehensive, systematic approaches and that clinical weaning indices like the Burns Weaning Assessment Program might best serve as tools to track trends in progress, keep care planning on target, and prevent unsuccessful weaning trials.</jats:p

Design, testing, and results of an outcomes-managed approach to patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation

BACKGROUND: Outcomes management that uses critical pathways may decrease costs while improving outcomes for patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of an outcomes-managed approach to weaning patients from prolonged (more than 3 days) mechanical ventilation. METHODS: A method of multidisciplinary care delivery was designed that included an outcomes manager, a care pathway for patients receiving mechanical ventilation, and weaning protocols. Data collection consisted of three parts: a retrospective review of 124 patients who required prolonged ventilation during a 1-year period before implementation of the care model, a 6-month prospective study in which 91 patients were alternately assigned by month to an outcomes-managed approach or a non-outcomes-managed approach, and a 6-month prospective study of 90 patients in which an outcomes-managed approach without alternate-month assignment was used. RESULTS: Outcomes management had no significant effect on total duration of mechanical ventilation or length of stay in the hospital, days of mechanical ventilation without tracheostomy, days of mechanical ventilation with tracheostomy, or outcome (weaned, withdrawal from mechanical ventilation, death, or transfer without weaning). However, duration of mechanical ventilation was 1.3 days shorter, length of stay in the hospital was 2.1 days shorter, and the cost per case was $ 3341 less for patients in the outcomes-managed group than for patients in the non-outcomes-managed group. CONCLUSION: Outcomes-managed care did not have a significant effect on duration of ventilation, length of stay in the hospital, or outcome in patients receiving long-term mechanical ventilation.</jats:p