How to select patients for anti-reflux surgery? The ICARUS guidelines (International Consensus regarding preoperative examinations and clinical characteristics assessment to select adult patients for AntiReflUx Surgery)

Objective: Anti-reflux surgery can be proposed in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease, especially when proton pump inhibitor use leads to incomplete symptom improvement. However, to date, international consensus guidelines on the clinical criteria and additional technical examinations used in patient selection for anti-reflux surgery are lacking. We aimed at generating key recommendations in the selection of patients for anti-reflux surgery. Design: We included 35 international experts (gastroenterologists, surgeons and physiologists) in a Delphi process and developed 37 statements that were revised by the Consensus Group, to start the Delphi process. Three voting rounds followed where each statement was presented with the evidence summary. The panel indicated the degree of agreement for the statement. When 80% of the Consensus Group agreed (A+/A) with a statement, this was defined as consensus. All votes were mutually anonymous.Results: Patients with heartburn with a satisfactory response to PPIs, patients with a hiatal hernia (HH), patients with esophagitis LA grade B or higher and patients with Barrett’s esophagus are good candidates for anti-reflux surgery. An endoscopy prior to anti-reflux surgery is mandatory and a barium swallow should be performed in patients with suspicion of a HH or short esophagus. Esophageal manometry is mandatory to rule out major motility disorders. Finally, esophageal pH (+/- impedance) monitoring off PPI is mandatory to select patients for anti-reflux surgery, if endoscopy is negative for unequivocal reflux esophagitis. Conclusion: With the ICARUS guidelines, we generated key recommendations for selection of patients for anti-reflux surgery

Status Update and Interim Results from the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2)

Objectives: ACST-2 is currently the largest trial ever conducted to compare carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis requiring revascularization. Methods: Patients are entered into ACST-2 when revascularization is felt to be clearly indicated, when CEA and CAS are both possible, but where there is substantial uncertainty as to which is most appropriate. Trial surgeons and interventionalists are expected to use their usual techniques and CE-approved devices. We report baseline characteristics and blinded combined interim results for 30-day mortality and major morbidity for 986 patients in the ongoing trial up to September 2012. Results: A total of 986 patients (687 men, 299 women), mean age 68.7 years (SD ± 8.1) were randomized equally to CEA or CAS. Most (96%) had ipsilateral stenosis of 70-99% (median 80%) with contralateral stenoses of 50-99% in 30% and contralateral occlusion in 8%. Patients were on appropriate medical treatment. For 691 patients undergoing intervention with at least 1-month follow-up and Rankin scoring at 6 months for any stroke, the overall serious cardiovascular event rate of periprocedural (within 30 days) disabling stroke, fatal myocardial infarction, and death at 30 days was 1.0%. Conclusions: Early ACST-2 results suggest contemporary carotid intervention for asymptomatic stenosis has a low risk of serious morbidity and mortality, on par with other recent trials. The trial continues to recruit, to monitor periprocedural events and all types of stroke, aiming to randomize up to 5,000 patients to determine any differential outcomes between interventions. Clinical trial: ISRCTN21144362. © 2013 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy

Background: Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence. Methods: ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362. Findings: Between Jan 15, 2008, and Dec 31, 2020, 3625 patients in 130 centres were randomly allocated, 1811 to CAS and 1814 to CEA, with good compliance, good medical therapy and a mean 5 years of follow-up. Overall, 1% had disabling stroke or death procedurally (15 allocated to CAS and 18 to CEA) and 2% had non-disabling procedural stroke (48 allocated to CAS and 29 to CEA). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year non-procedural stroke were 2·5% in each group for fatal or disabling stroke, and 5·3% with CAS versus 4·5% with CEA for any stroke (rate ratio [RR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·86–1·57; p=0·33). Combining RRs for any non-procedural stroke in all CAS versus CEA trials, the RR was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (overall RR 1·11, 95% CI 0·91–1·32; p=0·21). Interpretation: Serious complications are similarly uncommon after competent CAS and CEA, and the long-term effects of these two carotid artery procedures on fatal or disabling stroke are comparable. Funding: UK Medical Research Council and Health Technology Assessment Programme

Outcomes after endoscopic mucosal resection or esophagectomy for submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma Discussion

status: publishe

Long-term Preservation With Interim Evaluation of Lungs From a Non-Heart-Beating Donor After a Warm Ischemic Interval of 90 Minutes

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of in situ preservation and ex vivo evaluation of lungs from a non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) prior to long-term cold storage. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The use of pulmonary grafts from NHBD might alleviate the organ shortage. However, viability testing of these grafts is mandatory to transplant only those lungs with excellent function. METHODS: Pigs were divided into two groups. In the control group, lungs were flushed, explanted, and stored for 4 hours (4°C). In the study group, pigs were killed and left untouched for 90 minutes. Thereafter, the lungs were cooled for 150 minutes via chest drains. Graft function of the left lung in both groups was assessed in an isolated ventilation and reperfusion circuit 4 hours after death. The lung was then cooled and stored. Twenty-four hours after death, the pulmonary graft was reassessed in the same model. RESULTS: We did not observe a statistical significant difference between the two groups in pulmonary vascular resistance, mean airway pressure, and partial oxygen tension at each time point. There was also no statistical significant difference in wet-to-dry weight ratio. Finally, no statistical difference was found within both groups comparing the assessment at 24 hours with the interim evaluation at 4 hours. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that: 1) 90 minutes of warm ischemia and 150 minutes of intrapleural cooling do not affect pulmonary graft function; and 2) NHBD lungs can be safely preserved up to 24 hours. Finally, we have demonstrated that interim ex vivo evaluation of NHBD lungs is a valid and safe method to assess graft function

Palliative esophagectomy in unexpected metastatic disease: sense or nonsense?

Background Despite integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography screening before and after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, unexpected metastatic disease is still found in some patients during surgery. Should then esophagectomy be aborted or is there a place for palliative resection? Methods Between 2002 and 2015, 681 patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer were sheduled for neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent esophagectomy. In 552 patients, a potentially curative esophagectomy was performed. In 12 patients, unexpected disease was discovered during surgery but esophagectomy was performed with synchronous resection of metastases; 10 of them had oligometastatic disease (≤4 single-organ metastases). Esophagectomy was not performed in 117 patients (because of disease progression in 50); 14 were also single-organ oligometastatic. Data of 10 single-organ oligometastatic patients who underwent esophageal resection (group 1) were compared those of 10 non-resected but treated counterparts (group 2) and with 228 patients who underwent potentially curative esophagectomy with persistent pathological lymph nodes (group 3). Results Five oligometastatic esophagectomy patients had lung metastases: 1 peritoneal, 2 adrenal, 1 pleural, and 1 pancreatic. Two oligometastatic non-resected patients had lung, 5 liver, and 3 brain metastases. Median overall survival was 21.4, 12.1, and 20.2 months in the respective groups (group 1 vs. group 2  p = 0.042; group 2 vs. group 3  p = 0.002; group 1 vs. group 3  p = 0.88). Conclusions Survival is longer in patients undergoing palliative esophagectomy with unexpected single-organ oligometastatic disease and comparable to survival in patients with persistent pathological lymph nodes. Palliative resection in these patients seems to be justified.status: publishe

Alveolar expansion itself but not continuous oxygen supply enhances postmortem preservation of pulmonary grafts

Abstract Objective: If lungs could be retrieved for transplant after circulatory arrest, the shortage of donors might be significantly alleviated. Great controversy still exists concerning the optimal mode of preservation of pulmonary grafts in these non-heart-beating donors. Methods: Graft function was measured in an isolated room air-ventilated rabbit lung model during reperfusion with homologous, diluted (Hb 9 8.0 g/dl) and deoxygenated (PaO 2 9 40 mmHg) blood up to 4 h. Five groups of cadavers (n =4 in each group) were studied: In the control group, lungs were immediately reperfused. In the other groups, cadavers were left at room temperature for 4 h after death with lungs either deflated (group 1), inflated with room air (group 2), or ventilated with room air (group 3) or 100% nitrogen (group 4). Results: After 1 h of reperfusion, significant differences were noted between group 1 and groups 2, 3, and 4 in peak airway pressure (27 95 cm H 2 0 vs. 15 9 1 cm H 2 0, 17 9 2 cm H 2 0, and 16 91 cm H 2 0, respectively; PB 0.05), in weight gain (137 9 24 vs. 31 9 7, 30 9 3, and 30 9 2%, respectively; PB 0.05), and in veno-arterial oxygen pressure gradient (9 9 5 vs. 95 913, 96 97 and 96 9 4 mmHg, respectively; PB 0.05). Also, wet-to-dry weight ratio at end of reperfusion was significantly different (10.29 1.0 vs. 6.09 0.3, 5.29 0.3 and 5.49 0.5, respectively; PB 0.05). No significant differences in any of these parameters were observed between groups 2, 3, and 4. Conclusions: These data suggest that: (1) pulmonary edema will develop in atelectatic lungs if reperfusion is delayed for 4 h after death; (2) postmortem room air-inflation is as good as ventilation in prolonging warm ischemic tolerance; (3) ventilation with room air is no different from that with nitrogen; (4) therefore, prevention of alveolar collapse appears to be the critical factor in protecting the warm ischemic lung from reperfusion injury independent of continuous oxygen supply