Predniso(lo)ne Dosage and Chance of Remission in Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis

Background & Aims Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) commonly receive induction therapy with predniso(lo)ne followed by maintenance therapy with azathioprine. European Association for Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines advise a predniso(lo)ne dose range of 0.50–1 mg/kg/day, which leaves room for practice variation. We performed a multicenter study to determine the efficacy of different dose ranges of predniso(lo)ne induction therapy in a large European cohort of patients with AIH. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using a comparative effectiveness design. We collected data from 451 adults with AIH who began treatment from 1978 through 2017 at 9 centers in 5 European countries. We assigned patients to a high-dose group (initial predniso(lo)ne dose ≥0.50 mg/kg/day; n=281) or a low-dose group (<0.50 mg/kg/day; n=170). Logistic regression was performed to determine difference in outcomes between the groups. The primary outcome was normal serum levels of transaminases at 6 months after initiation of therapy. Results There was no significant difference in rates of normalization of transaminases between the high-dose predniso(lo)ne group and the low-dose group (70.5% vs 64.7%; P =.20). After multivariable logistic regression with correction for confounders, there was no difference in the likelihood of normalization of transaminases between the groups (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.78 – 1.87; P =.38). Patients given an initial high dose of predniso(lo)ne received more predniso(lo)ne over time than patients started on a lower dose (median doses over 6 months: 3780 mg vs 2573 mg) ( P <.01). Conclusions In a retrospective study of patients with AIH in Europe, we found that the dose of predniso(lo)ne to induce remission in patients with AIH is less relevant than assumed. An initial predniso(lo)ne dose below 0.50 mg/kg/day substantially decreases unnecessary exposure to predniso(lo)ne in patients with AIH

An open-label randomised-controlled trial of azathioprine vs. mycophenolate mofetil for the induction of remission in treatment-naive autoimmune hepatitis

Background &amp; Aims: Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) almost invariably require lifelong immunosuppressive treatment. There is genuine concern about the efficacy and tolerability of the current standard combination therapy of prednisolone and azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as an alternative option. The aim of this study was to compare MMF to azathioprine as induction therapy for AIH. Methods: In this 24-week, prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre superiority trial, 70 patients with treatment-naive AIH received either MMF or azathioprine, both in combination with prednisolone. The primary endpoint was biochemical remission defined as normalisation of serum levels of alanine aminotransferase and IgG after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability. Results: Seventy patients (mean 57.9 years [SD 14.0]; 72.9% female) were randomly assigned to the MMF plus prednisolone (n = 39) or azathioprine plus prednisolone (n = 31) group. The primary endpoint was met in 56.4% and 29.0% of patients assigned to the MMF group and the azathioprine group, respectively (difference, 27.4 percentage points; 95% CI 4.0 to 46.7; p = 0.022). The MMF group exhibited higher complete biochemical response rates at 6 months (72.2% vs. 32.3%; p = 0.004). No serious adverse events occurred in patients who received MMF (0%) but serious adverse events were reported in four patients who received azathioprine (12.9%) (p = 0.034). Two patients in the MMF group (5.1%) and eight patients in the azathioprine group (25.8%) discontinued treatment owing to adverse events or serious adverse events (p = 0.018). Conclusions: In patients with treatment-naive AIH, MMF with prednisolone led to a significantly higher rate of biochemical remission at 24 weeks compared to azathioprine combined with prednisolone. Azathioprine use was associated with more (serious) adverse events leading to cessation of treatment, suggesting superior tolerability of MMF. Impact and implications: This randomised-controlled trial directly compares azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, both in combination with prednisolone, for the induction of biochemical remission in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Achieving complete remission is desirable to prevent disease progression. Patients assigned to the mycophenolate mofetil group reached biochemical remission more often and experienced fewer adverse events. The findings in this trial may contribute to the re-evaluation of international guidelines for the standard of care in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Trial registration number: #NCT02900443.</p

An open-label randomised-controlled trial of azathioprine vs. mycophenolate mofetil for the induction of remission in treatment-naive autoimmune hepatitis

Background &amp; Aims: Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) almost invariably require lifelong immunosuppressive treatment. There is genuine concern about the efficacy and tolerability of the current standard combination therapy of prednisolone and azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as an alternative option. The aim of this study was to compare MMF to azathioprine as induction therapy for AIH. Methods: In this 24-week, prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre superiority trial, 70 patients with treatment-naive AIH received either MMF or azathioprine, both in combination with prednisolone. The primary endpoint was biochemical remission defined as normalisation of serum levels of alanine aminotransferase and IgG after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability. Results: Seventy patients (mean 57.9 years [SD 14.0]; 72.9% female) were randomly assigned to the MMF plus prednisolone (n = 39) or azathioprine plus prednisolone (n = 31) group. The primary endpoint was met in 56.4% and 29.0% of patients assigned to the MMF group and the azathioprine group, respectively (difference, 27.4 percentage points; 95% CI 4.0 to 46.7; p = 0.022). The MMF group exhibited higher complete biochemical response rates at 6 months (72.2% vs. 32.3%; p = 0.004). No serious adverse events occurred in patients who received MMF (0%) but serious adverse events were reported in four patients who received azathioprine (12.9%) (p = 0.034). Two patients in the MMF group (5.1%) and eight patients in the azathioprine group (25.8%) discontinued treatment owing to adverse events or serious adverse events (p = 0.018). Conclusions: In patients with treatment-naive AIH, MMF with prednisolone led to a significantly higher rate of biochemical remission at 24 weeks compared to azathioprine combined with prednisolone. Azathioprine use was associated with more (serious) adverse events leading to cessation of treatment, suggesting superior tolerability of MMF. Impact and implications: This randomised-controlled trial directly compares azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, both in combination with prednisolone, for the induction of biochemical remission in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Achieving complete remission is desirable to prevent disease progression. Patients assigned to the mycophenolate mofetil group reached biochemical remission more often and experienced fewer adverse events. The findings in this trial may contribute to the re-evaluation of international guidelines for the standard of care in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Trial registration number: #NCT02900443.</p

Expanding the clinical application of the polycystic liver disease questionnaire:determination of a clinical threshold to select patients for therapy

Background: Polycystic liver disease (PLD) causes symptoms resulting from cystic volume expansion. The PLD-specific questionnaire (PLD-Q) captures symptom burden. This study aims to develop a threshold to identify patients with symptoms requiring further exploration and possibly intervention. Methods: We recruited PLD patients with completed PLD-Qs during their patient journey. We evaluated baseline PLD-Q scores in (un)treated PLD patients to determine a threshold of clinical importance. We assessed our threshold's discriminative ability with receiver operator characteristic statistics, Youden Index, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value parameters. Results: We included 198 patients with a balanced proportion of treated (n=100) and untreated patients (n=98, PLD-Q scores 49 vs 19, p&lt;0.001; median total liver volume 5827 vs 2185 ml, p&lt;0.001). We established the PLD-Q threshold at 32 points. A score of =32 differentiates treated from untreated patients with an area under the ROC of 0.856, Youden Index 0.564, sensitivity of 85.0%, specificity of 71.4%, positive predictive value of 75.2%, and negative predictive value of 82.4%. Similar metrics were observed in predefined subgroups and an external cohort. Conclusion: We established the PLD-Q threshold at 32 points with high discriminative ability to identify symptomatic patients. Patients with a score =32 should be eligible for treatment or inclusion in trials

Higher need for polycystic liver disease therapy in female patients:Sex-specific association between liver volume and need for therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prognostic tools or biomarkers are urgently needed in polycystic liver disease (PLD) to monitor disease progression and evaluate treatment outcomes. Total liver volume (TLV) is currently used to assess cross-sectional disease severity, and female patients typically have larger livers than males. Therefore, this study explores the sex-specific association between TLV and volume-reducing therapy (VRT). APPROACH AND RESULTS: In this prospective cohort study, we included patients with PLD from European treatment centers. We explored sex-specific differences in the association between baseline TLV and initiation of volume-reducing therapy and determined the cumulative incidence rates of volume-reducing therapy in our cohort.We included 358 patients, of whom 157 (43.9%) received treatment. Treated patients had a higher baseline TLV (median TLV 2.16 vs. 4.34 liter, p &lt; 0.001), were more frequently female (69.7% vs. 89.8%, p &lt; 0.001), and had a higher risk of liver events (HR 4.381, p &lt; 0.001). The cumulative volume-reducing therapy rate at 1 year of follow-up was 21.0% for females compared to 9.1% for males. Baseline TLV was associated with volume-reducing therapy, and there was an interaction with sex (HR females 1.202, p &lt; 0.001; HR males 1.790, p &lt; 0.001; at 1.5 l). CONCLUSION:Baseline TLV is strongly associated with volume-reducing therapy initiation at follow-up in patients with PLD, with sex-specific differences in this association. Disease staging systems should use TLV to predict the need for future volume-reducing therapy in PLD separately for males and females.</p

Higher need for polycystic liver disease therapy in female patients:Sex-specific association between liver volume and need for therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Prognostic tools or biomarkers are urgently needed in polycystic liver disease (PLD) to monitor disease progression and evaluate treatment outcomes. Total liver volume (TLV) is currently used to assess cross-sectional disease severity, and female patients typically have larger livers than males. Therefore, this study explores the sex-specific association between TLV and volume-reducing therapy (VRT). APPROACH AND RESULTS: In this prospective cohort study, we included patients with PLD from European treatment centers. We explored sex-specific differences in the association between baseline TLV and initiation of volume-reducing therapy and determined the cumulative incidence rates of volume-reducing therapy in our cohort.We included 358 patients, of whom 157 (43.9%) received treatment. Treated patients had a higher baseline TLV (median TLV 2.16 vs. 4.34 liter, p &lt; 0.001), were more frequently female (69.7% vs. 89.8%, p &lt; 0.001), and had a higher risk of liver events (HR 4.381, p &lt; 0.001). The cumulative volume-reducing therapy rate at 1 year of follow-up was 21.0% for females compared to 9.1% for males. Baseline TLV was associated with volume-reducing therapy, and there was an interaction with sex (HR females 1.202, p &lt; 0.001; HR males 1.790, p &lt; 0.001; at 1.5 l). CONCLUSION:Baseline TLV is strongly associated with volume-reducing therapy initiation at follow-up in patients with PLD, with sex-specific differences in this association. Disease staging systems should use TLV to predict the need for future volume-reducing therapy in PLD separately for males and females.</p

Young women with polycystic liver disease respond best to somatostatin analogues: a pooled analysis of individual patient data

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND & AIMS: Clinical trials have shown that in patients with polycystic liver disease (PLD), short-term treatment with somatostatin analogues (SAs) reduces liver volumes by 4.5%-5.9%, compared with placebo. However, the effects of SA therapy vary among individuals. We collected data from individual patients with PLD to identify subgroups that benefit most from SA therapy. METHODS: We analyzed data from 107 patients with PLD from 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials (67 received SAs, 52 received placebo). We used multiple linear regression analysis to determine the effects of SAs based on patients' age, sex, baseline liver volume, and diagnosis (autosomal dominant polycystic liver or kidney disease). The primary outcome was change in liver volume after 6-12 months of treatment. RESULTS: The effects of SA therapy did not differ significantly among patients with different diagnoses or baseline liver volumes; the overall difference in liver volume between groups receiving SAs therapy vs placebo was 5.3% (P < .001). Among subjects given placebo, young women (48 years old or younger) had the greatest increase in polycystic liver volume (4.8%; 95% confidence interval: 2.2%-7.4%), and mean liver volumes did not increase in older women and men. Women 48 years old or younger had a greater response to therapy (a reduction in liver volume of 8.0% compared with placebo; P < .001) than older women (a reduction in liver volume of 4.1% compared with placebo; P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: Based on a pooled analysis of data from individual patients with PLD, treatment with somatostatin analogues is equally effective for patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease or polycystic liver disease; efficacy does not depend on size of the polycystic liver. Young female patients appear to have the greatest benefit from 6-12 months of SA therapy, which might avert the progressive course of the disease in this specific group

Tacrolimus versus mycophenolate for AutoImmune hepatitis patients with incompLete response On first-line therapy (TAILOR study):a study protocol for a phase III, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Background: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare, chronic inflammatory disease of the liver. The treatment goal is reaching complete biochemical response (CR), defined as the normalisation of aspartate and alanine aminotransferases and immunoglobulin gamma. Ongoing AIH activity can lead to fibrosis and (decompensated) cirrhosis. Incomplete biochemical response is the most important risk factor for liver transplantation or liver-related mortality. First-line treatment consists of a combination of azathioprine and prednisolone. If CR is not reached, tacrolimus (TAC) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can be used as second-line therapy. Both products are registered for the prevention of graft rejection in solid organ transplant recipients. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of TAC and MMF as second-line treatment for AIH. Methods: The TAILOR study is a phase IIIB, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised (1:1) controlled trial performed in large teaching and university hospitals in the Netherlands. We will enrol 86 patients with AIH who have not reached CR after at least 6 months of treatment with first-line therapy. Patients are randomised to TAC (0.07 mg/kg/day initially and adjusted by trough levels) or MMF (max 2000 mg/day), stratified by the presence of cirrhosis at inclusion. The primary endpoint is the difference in the proportion of patients reaching CR after 12 months. Secondary endpoints include the difference in the proportion of patients reaching CR after 6 months, adverse effects, difference in fibrogenesis, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Discussion: This is the first randomised controlled trial comparing two second-line therapies for AIH. Currently, second-line treatment is based on retrospective cohort studies. The rarity of AIH is the main issue in clinical research for alternative treatment options. The results of this trial can be implemented in existing international clinical guidelines. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05221411 . Retrospectively registered on 3 February 2022; EudraCT number 2021–003420-33. Prospectively registered on 16 June 2021.</p