44 research outputs found

    Restoration of tumor-specific HLA class I restricted cytotoxicity in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes of advanced breast cancer patients by in vitro stimulation with tumor antigen-pulsed autologous dendritic cells.

    Get PDF
    Breast tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are enriched in tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), and may represent a superior source of CTL compare to peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), for adoptive T cell immunotherapy of breast cancer. However, the immunocompetence of TIL and the possibility to consistently restore their tumor-specific lytic activity in vitro remains an open issue. In this study we evaluated the potential of tumor antigen-pulsed fully mature dendritic cell (DC) stimulation in restoring tumor-specific cytotoxicity in anergic TIL populations from advanced breast cancer patients. In addition we have compared tumor-specific T cell responses induced by tumor antigen-loaded DC stimulation of TIL to responses induced from PBL. Although TIL were consistently non-cytotoxic after isolation or culture in the presence of interleukin-2 (IL-2), in matched experiments from three consecutive patients, tumor-lysate-pulsed DC-stimulated CD8+ T cell derived from TIL were found to be significantly more cytotoxic than PBL (p < 0.05). In addition, cytotoxicity against autologous tumor cells was more significantly inhibited by an anti-HLA class I (W6/32) MAb in TIL compared to PBL (p < 0.05). CTL populations derived from TIL and PBL did not lyse autologous EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines, and showed negligible cytotoxicity against the NK-sensitive cell line K562. Furthermore, in both CD8+ T cell populations the majority of the tumor-specific CTL exhibited a Th1 cytokine bias (IFN-gamma(high)/IL-4(low)). Taken together, these data show that tumor lysate-pulsed mature DC can consistently restore tumor-specific lytic activity in non-cytotoxic breast cancer TIL. These results may have important implications for the treatment of chemotherapy resistant breast cancer with active or adoptive immunotherap

    In vitro induction of tumor-specific HLA class I-restricted CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes from patients with locally advanced breast cancer by tumor antigen-pulsed autologous dendritic cells.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Early dissemination of treatment-resistant tumor cells remains the major cause of metastatic recurrence and death in breast cancer patients. Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most powerful antigen-presenting cells, and recently DC-based vaccination has shown great promise for the treatment of human malignancies by immunological intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CD8+ T lymphocytes derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated in vitro with autologous breast tumor antigen-pulsed DCs were tested for their ability to induce a HLA class I restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response against autologous tumor cells. To correlate cytotoxic activity by CTL with T cell phenotype, two-color flow cytometric analysis of surface markers and intracellular cytokine expression was performed. RESULTS: DC pulsed with breast tumor extracts consistently elicited a tumor-specific HLA class I restricted CTL response in vitro in three consecutive patients harboring locally advanced breast cancer. CTL expressed strong cytolytic activity against autologous tumor cells but did not lyse autologous Epstein Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines and showed variable cytotoxicity against the natural killer-sensitive cell line K-562. In all patients, two color flow cytometric analysis of surface markers and intracellular cytokine expression demonstrated that tumor-specific CTL exhibited an heterogeneous CD8+/CD56+ expression and a striking Th1 cytokine bias (IFNgamma(high)/IL-4 (low)). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor lysate-pulsed DCs can consistently stimulate specific CD8+ CTLs able to kill autologous tumor cells in patients with locally advanced breast cancer in vitro. Tumor antigen-pulsed DC-based vaccinations may be appropriate for the treatment of residual and/or chemotherapy-resistant breast cancer refractory to standard salvage treatment modalities

    Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS): a systematic review of anatomy and potential risk factors

    Get PDF
    Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (PFPS), a common cause of anterior knee pain, is successfully treated in over 2/3 of patients through rehabilitation protocols designed to reduce pain and return function to the individual. Applying preventive medicine strategies, the majority of cases of PFPS may be avoided if a pre-diagnosis can be made by clinician or certified athletic trainer testing the current researched potential risk factors during a Preparticipation Screening Evaluation (PPSE). We provide a detailed and comprehensive review of the soft tissue, arterial system, and innervation to the patellofemoral joint in order to supply the clinician with the knowledge required to assess the anatomy and make recommendations to patients identified as potentially at risk. The purpose of this article is to review knee anatomy and the literature regarding potential risk factors associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome and prehabilitation strategies. A comprehensive review of knee anatomy will present the relationships of arterial collateralization, innervations, and soft tissue alignment to the possible multifactoral mechanism involved in PFPS, while attempting to advocate future use of different treatments aimed at non-soft tissue causes of PFPS

    Challenge clusters facing LCA in environmental decision-making—what we can learn from biofuels

    Get PDF
    Purpose Bioenergy is increasingly used to help meet greenhouse gas (GHG) and renewable energy targets. However, bioenergy’s sustainability has been questioned, resulting in increasing use of life cycle assessment (LCA). Bioenergy systems are global and complex, and market forces can result in significant changes, relevant to LCA and policy. The goal of this paper is to illustrate the complexities associated with LCA, with particular focus on bioenergy and associated policy development, so that its use can more effectively inform policymakers. Methods The review is based on the results from a series of workshops focused on bioenergy life cycle assessment. Expert submissions were compiled and categorized within the first two workshops. Over 100 issues emerged. Accounting for redundancies and close similarities in the list, this reduced to around 60 challenges, many of which are deeply interrelated. Some of these issues were then explored further at a policyfacing workshop in London, UK. The authors applied a rigorous approach to categorize the challenges identified to be at the intersection of biofuels/bioenergy LCA and policy. Results and discussion The credibility of LCA is core to its use in policy. Even LCAs that comply with ISO standards and policy and regulatory instruments leave a great deal of scope for interpretation and flexibility. Within the bioenergy sector, this has led to frustration and at times a lack of obvious direction. This paper identifies the main challenge clusters: overarching issues, application and practice and value and ethical judgments. Many of these are reflective of the transition from application of LCA to assess individual products or systems to the wider approach that is becoming more common. Uncertainty in impact assessment strongly influences planning and compliance due to challenges in assigning accountability, and communicating the inherent complexity and uncertainty within bioenergy is becoming of greater importance. Conclusions The emergence of LCA in bioenergy governance is particularly significant because other sectors are likely to transition to similar governance models. LCA is being stretched to accommodate complex and broad policy-relevant questions, seeking to incorporate externalities that have major implications for long-term sustainability. As policy increasingly relies on LCA, the strains placed on the methodology are becoming both clearer and impedimentary. The implications for energy policy, and in particular bioenergy, are large
    corecore