73 research outputs found

    Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced colorectal cancer: a Japanese multicenter study

    Get PDF
    Purpose: The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer has not yet been investigated; thus, this study aimed to examine the safety, feasibility, and oncological effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer.Methods: In this multicenter study, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 83 locally advanced colorectal cancer patients (cT3/4 or N1/2) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical resection between April 2016 and September 2020. The NAC regimens were FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin), XELOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin), or SOX (S-1 and oxaliplatin). We evaluated the pathological responses as well as the short- and long-term outcomes.Results: A pathological complete response was achieved in 4 patients (4.8%). Tumor down-staging and nodal down-staging were achieved in 57 (68.7%) and 49 (59.0%) patients, respectively. One patient (1.2%) experienced progressive disease. Postoperative complications occurred in 21 patients (25.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the pathological N positive status (p = 0.015; odds ratio, 4.458; 95% confidence interval, 1.331 to 7.9300) was an independent predictive factor for relapse-free survival.Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer could achieve good tumor control and down-staging without increasing the rate of complications. Appropriate preoperative treatment that can reduce the rate of the pathological nodepositive disease may improve oncological outcomes

    Phamacogenomics of Clozapine-Induced Agranulocytosis

    Get PDF
    Background: Clozapine-induced agranulocytosis (CIA)/clozapine-induced granulocytopenia (CIG) (CIAG) is a life-threatening event for schizophrenic subjects treated with clozapine. Methods: To examine the genetic factor for CIAG, a genome-wide pharmacogenomic analysis was conducted using 50 subjects with CIAG and 2905 control subjects. Results: We identified a significant association in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region (rs1800625, p = 3.46 × 10−9, odds ratio [OR] = 3.8); therefore, subsequent HLA typing was performed. We detected a significant association of HLA-B*59:01 with CIAG (p = 3.81 × 10−8, OR = 10.7) and confirmed this association by comparing with an independent clozapine-tolerant control group (n = 380, p = 2.97 × 10−5, OR = 6.3). As we observed that the OR of CIA (OR: 9.3~15.8) was approximately double that in CIG (OR: 4.4~7.4), we hypothesized that the CIG subjects were a mixed population of those who potentially would develop CIA and those who would not develop CIA (non-CIA). This hypothesis allowed the proportion of the CIG who were non-CIA to be calculated, enabling us to estimate the positive predictive value of the nonrisk allele on non-CIA in CIG subjects. Assuming this model, we estimated that 1) ~50% of CIG subjects would be non-CIA; and 2) ~60% of the CIG subjects without the risk allele would be non-CIA and therefore not expected to develop CIA. Conclusions: Our results suggest that HLA-B*59:01 is a risk factor for CIAG in the Japanese population. Furthermore, if our model is true, the results suggest that rechallenging certain CIG subjects with clozapine may not be always contraindicated

    Cancer Risk in Diabetic Patients Treated with Metformin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence has suggested that metformin potentially reduces the risk of cancer. Our objective was to enhance the precision of estimates of the effect of metformin on the risk of any-site and site-specific cancers in patients with diabetes. METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We performed a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for pertinent articles published as of October 12, 2011, and included them in a systematic review and meta-analysis. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) for overall cancer mortality and cancer incidence. Of the 21,195 diabetic patients reported in 6 studies (4 cohort studies, 2 RCTs), 991 (4.5%) cases of death from cancer were reported. A total of 11,117 (5.3%) cases of incident cancer at any site were reported among 210,892 patients in 10 studies (2 RCTs, 6 cohort studies, 2 case-control studies). The risks of cancer among metformin users were significantly lower than those among non-metformin users: the pooled RRs (95% confidence interval) were 0.66 (0.49-0.88) for cancer mortality, 0.67 (0.53-0.85) for all-cancer incidence, 0.68 (0.53-0.88) for colorectal cancer (n = 6), 0.20 (0.07-0.59) for hepatocellular cancer (n = 4), 0.67 (0.45-0.99) for lung cancer (n = 3). CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The use of metformin in diabetic patients was associated with significantly lower risks of cancer mortality and incidence. However, this analysis is mainly based on observational studies and our findings underscore the more need for long-term RCTs to confirm this potential benefit for individuals with diabetes
    corecore