6 research outputs found
[Effect of a probiotic strain administration in different feeding phases on Ξ±- and Ξ²-diversity and gene expression of the rumen microbiome in lactating cows] ΠΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ° Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΌΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π° Ξ±- ΠΈ Ξ²-ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ° Ρ Π»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ²
In cows, there is a drastic metabolic stress caused by violations of the rumen microbiome composition during lactation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the Ξ±-and Ξ²-diversity of the rumen microbiome of lactating cows using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and gene expression assessed by qPCR, as well as evaluation of the corrective properties of a probiotic strain introduced into the rumen. The results showed that the addition of the probiotic to the diet contributed to an effective increase in the fat content of milk during the early lactation period (P β€ 0.05). The NGS-based analysis of the rumen microbiome of the studied cows using the 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the Shannon and Chao1 indices of Ξ±-diversity of prokaryotic communities remained unchanged during various feeding phases, as well as due to the probiotic effects. In the early lactation period and under the probioticβs impact, the number of representatives of the Clostridia_UCG-014 and Clostridiaceae families declined by 2.4 and 1.6 times, respectively (in Group 2 as compared to Group 1, P β€ 0.05). Expression of the bacterial Ldh-L and ldhD genes was lower by 2.9 and 13.5 times, respectively (P β€ 0.05), when adding the probiotic to the diet in the early lactation period.
Π£ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π΅Ρ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ, Π²ΡΠ·Π²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π° ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ° ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ° Π² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Π»Π°ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Ξ±- ΠΈ Ξ²-ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ° ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ° Π»Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ (NGS) ΠΈ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ², ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ qPCR, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ³ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ°, Π²Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π² ΡΡΠ±Π΅Ρ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΠ±Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΆΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΊΠ° Π² ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Π»Π°ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ (Π β€0,05). ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ° ΡΡΠ±ΡΠ° ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ NGS Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π³Π΅Π½Π° 16S ΡΠ ΠΠ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π», ΡΡΠΎ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΡ Π¨Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΈ Chao1 Ξ±-ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ² ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π΅ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΌΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π·Π° ΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ². Π ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π»Π°ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ΠΉΡΡΠ² Clostridia_UCG-014 ΠΈ Clostridiaceae ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ Π² 2,4 ΠΈ 1,6 ΡΠ°Π·Π° ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ (Π²ΠΎ 2-ΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ 1-ΠΉ, P β€ 0,05). ΠΠΊΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π³Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ² Ldh-L ΠΈ ldhD Π±ΡΠ»Π° Π½ΠΈΠΆΠ΅ Π² 2,9 ΠΈ 13,5 ΡΠ°Π·Π° ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ (P β€ 0,05) ΠΏΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ±Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π² ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Π»Π°ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ.
Russian authors' names: ΠΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ³ΠΈΠΉ ΠΠ°ΠΏΡΠ΅Π², ΠΠ°ΡΡΡ Π’ΡΡΠΈΠ½Π°, ΠΠ»Π΅Π½Π° ΠΡΠ»Π΄ΡΡΡΠΌ, ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΠ»ΡΠΈΠ½Π°, ΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠΊΠΈΠ½Π°, ΠΠΠ Β«ΠΠΠΠ’Π ΠΠ€+Β», Π‘Π°Π½ΠΊΡ-ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ±ΡΡΠ³ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π°Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ (Π€ΠΠΠΠ£ ΠΠ Π‘ΠΠ±ΠΠΠ£), Π‘Π°Π½ΠΊΡ-ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ±ΡΡΠ³, Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ. ΠΠ°Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½Π° Π€ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠΏΠΏΠΎΠ²Π°, ΠΠ½Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΡΠ±ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½, ΠΠ°ΡΠ°Π»ΡΡ ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°, ΠΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅Π²Π°, ΠΠΠ Β«ΠΠΠΠ’Π ΠΠ€Β», Π‘Π°Π½ΠΊΡ-ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ±ΡΡΠ³, Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ. Π₯Π°ΠΉΡΡΠ»Π»Π°ΠΌΠΈΠ½ ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΡ, Π’Π°ΡΡΡΠ½Π° Π‘ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°, ΠΠ²Π°Π½ ΠΠ°Π»Π°Ρ
ΠΎΠ², Π‘Π°Π½ΠΊΡ-ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ±ΡΡΠ³ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π°Π³ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ (Π€ΠΠΠΠ£ ΠΠ Π‘ΠΠ±ΠΠΠ£), Π‘Π°Π½ΠΊΡ-ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ±ΡΡΠ³, Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ. ΠΠΈΡ
Π°ΠΈΠ» Π ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ², ΠΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ, ΠΠ΅Π»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ.
(Π’ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡ "Π¦ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ADOP 2023": ΠΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡ, 5β7 ΠΈΡΠ½Ρ 2023 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π° Π³., Π‘Π°Π½ΠΊΡ-ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ±ΡΡΠ³, Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡ
Joint Will of Spouses in Russian and Foreign Legislation: a Comparative Research
We made a comparative analysis between the legislation of Russia and some foreign countries on the joint will of spouses by methods of scientific knowledge in order to draw conclusions about the prospects of development of Russian legislation using foreign experience. We also considered the legislation on the general will of spouses and checked the the features of the joint will of spouses under the legislation of Germany, England, Ukraine and other countries. We prepared some proposals for improving the legislation of the Russian Federation on the joint will of spouses. The result of the study is the conclusion that the joint will in Russian law is a logical and justified innovation, reflecting a conceptual approach to the disposal of common property of spouses, based on the expansion of the dispositivity in inheritance law
The relationship between value orientations and personal readiness for activity in youth from Russia, Kazakhstan and Latvia
Background. The development of high-quality human capital is an important objective that involves value orientations, cultural dimensions and psychological characteristics of activity. This article presents a cross-cultural comparison of value orientations and psychological parameters of activity among youth from Russia, Kazakhstan, and Latvia. Objective. The study addressed three questions: (1) Are there values and attitudes related to the readiness for activity among youth in the three countries? (2) Are there any dfferences between values and parameters of the psychological system of activity in the Russian, Kazakhstani and Latvian samples? (3) What values and attitudes predict the youthβs readiness for activity in each country? Design. University students from Russia, Kazakhstan and Latvia were invited to participate in the study. !e study sample was selected according to age, sex and period of living in the country. Value orientations, cultural dimensions and attitudes were measured by the Values Survey Module, World Values Survey questionnaire, !e Subjective Evaluation of Basic Values Realisability. Personality Research Form, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, Subjective Happiness Scale, Self-Organisation of Activity Questionnaire, Differential Test of Re#exivity, and Satisfaction with Life Scale questionnaires were applied to evaluate the psychological parameters of activity. To analyse the relationship between value orientations and psychological parameters of activity, we used analysis of variance, Pearsonβs correlation coe$cient and stepwise linear regression. Results. The cross-cultural variance was established for most values and cultural dimensions in the Russian, Kazakhstani, and Latvian samples, but Personal readiness for activity only di"ered on the tendency level between the Kazakhstani and Latvian samples. Di"erent values and attitudes accounted for near 57% of the Personal readiness for activity index in Russia and Latvia, but just less than 29% in Kazakhstan. Conclusion. The activity of university students from Russia depends on their need for achievement and level of happiness. In the Kazakhstani and Latvian samples, the most important factor was the quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction index
Effect of a probiotic strain administration in different feeding phases on Ξ±- and Ξ²-diversity and gene expression of the rumen microbiome in lactating cows
In cows, there is a drastic metabolic stress caused by violations of the rumen microbiome composition during lactation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the Ξ±-and Ξ²-diversity of the rumen microbiome of lactating cows using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and gene expression assessed by qPCR, as well as evaluation of the corrective properties of a probiotic strain introduced into the rumen. The results showed that the addition of the probiotic to the diet contributed to an effective increase in the fat content of milk during the early lactation period (P β€ 0.05). The NGS-based analysis of the rumen microbiome of the studied cows using the 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the Shannon and Chao1 indices of Ξ±-diversity of prokaryotic communities remained unchanged during various feeding phases, as well as due to the probiotic effects. In the early lactation period and under the probioticβs impact, the number of representatives of the Clostridia_UCG-014 and Clostridiaceae families declined by 2.4 and 1.6 times, respectively (in Group 2 as compared to Group 1, P β€ 0.05). Expression of the bacterial Ldh-L and ldhD genes was lower by 2.9 and 13.5 times, respectively (P β€ 0.05), when adding the probiotic to the diet in the early lactation period