5 research outputs found

    Practical considerations of the use of cross-weld and compact tension specimens creep data

    Get PDF
    This article gives an overview of the use of cross-weld and compact tension specimen modelling and analyses data to characterise creep behaviour of the high-temperature components. Cross-weld and compact tension specimens are used to describe creep crack growth in heterogeneous material structures, such as welds, and a number of factors that affect the creep behaviour of the structure, associated with this heterogeneity, have been identified. Creep data obtained from cross-weld specimen modelling are substantially affected by the material model used (e.g. Norton power law, Liu-Murakami), stress singularities that arise at the material interfaces and in between the columnar and equiaxed zones of the weld material, residual stresses which arise through the thickness of a multi-pass weld and the extraction orientation of the specimen relative to the welding direction. Creep crack growth data obtained from compact tension specimen testing and analyses are strongly dependent on the material models used (isotropic hardening models, Norton creep law, Liu/Murakami model, etc.), the path dependence of the C*-contour integral fracture parameter for certain heterogeneous material configurations and the accurate computation of material constants for damage mechanics models and the agreement between loading state to the actual stress state of the component to which the compact tension specimen creep data are applied to. This study examines typical results and observations from cross-weld specimen and compact tension specimen creep analyses, identifying the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of each specimen procedure

    International Consensus Statement on Rhinology and Allergy: Rhinosinusitis

    Get PDF
    Background: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR‐RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR‐RS‐2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence‐based findings of the document. Methods: ICAR‐RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence‐based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence‐based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary. Results: ICAR‐RS‐2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence‐based management algorithm is provided. Conclusion: This ICAR‐RS‐2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence‐based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS

    Interpretation of small ring creep test data

    No full text
    corecore