8 research outputs found

    A genetic explanation of slaughter's concept of field cancerization: Evidence and clinical implications

    No full text
    The concept of "field cancerization" was first introduced by Slaughter et el. [D. P, Slaughter et al., Cancer (Phila.), 6: 963-968, 1953] in 1953 when studying the presence of histologically abnormal tissue surrounding oral squamous cell carcinoma. It was proposed to explain the development of multiple primary tumors and locally recurrent cancer. Organ systems in which field cancerization has been described since then are: head and neck (oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx), lung, vulva, esophagus, cervix, breast, skin, colon, and bladder. Recent molecular findings support the carcinogenesis model in which the development of a field with genetically altered cells plays a central role. In the initial phase, a stem cell acquires genetic alterations and forms a "patch," a clonal unit of altered daughter cells. These patches can be recognized on the basis of mutations in TP53, and have been reported for head and neck, lung, skin, and breast cancer. The conversion of a patch into an expanding field is the next logical and critical step in epithelial carcinogenesis. Additional genetic alterations are required for this step, and by virtue of its growth advantage, a proliferating field gradually displaces the normal mucosa. In the mucosa of the head and neck, as well as the esophagus, such fields have been detected with dimensions of >7 cm in diameter, whereas they are usually not detected by routine diagnostic techniques. Ultimately, clonal divergence leads to the development of one or more tumors within a contiguous field of preneoplastic cells. An important clinical implication is that fields often remain after surgery of the primary tumor and may lead to new cancers, designated presently by clinicians as "a second primary tumor" or "local recurrence," depending on the exact site and time interval. In conclusion, the development of an expanding preneoplastic field appears to be a critical step in epithelial carcinogenesis with important clinical consequences. Diagnosis and treatment of epithelial cancers should not only be focused on the tumor but also on the field from which it developed

    Nonmalignant oral keratinocytes from patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma show enhanced metabolism of retinoic acid

    No full text
    Background and Objective: Retinoids show promise in the treatment of various (pre)malignancies, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). It has been shown that metabolic pathways of retinoids are important in their anticancer effect and that these pathways may change during HNSCC carcinogenesis. We have previously reported that HNSCC cells have a 17-fold greater turnover rate of retinoic acid (RA) than normal oral keratinocytes from noncancer controls, and that the formation of polar metabolites such as 4-oxo-RA and 4-hydroxy-RA is only seen in HNSCC cell lines. We aimed to establish whether this altered retinoid metabolism is an intrinsic characteristic of HNSCC patients. Methods: The normal mucosa of cancer and noncancer patients was the source of keratinocyte cultures. The cells were exposed to RA for various time periods, and the levels of various retinoids were measured in the culture medium and cell pellets with reverse-phase liquid chromatography. Results: Cells from cancer patients were morphologically normal and showed no genetic aberrations (i.e. loss of heterozygosity). The RA turnover rate in normal oral keratinocytes of cancer patients was 15 times higher (p = 0.003) than that in normal oral keratinocytes of noncancer controls, with average turnover rates of 218.6 and 14.8 pmol/mg protein/h, respectively. Specific profiles of RA metabolites were similar. Conclusion: The observed higher RA metabolism in noncancer cells of HNSCC patients suggests that individuals with a relatively high RA turnover have an increased risk of developing HNSCC

    Multiple Head and Neck Tumors Frequently Originate from a Single Preneoplastic Lesion

    No full text
    The development of second primary tumors has a negative impact on the prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Previously, we detected genetically altered and tumor-related mucosal lesions in the resection margins in 25% of unselected head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients (Tabor MP, Brakenhoff RH, van Houten VMM, Kummer JA, Snel MHJ, Snijders PJF, Snow GB, Leemans CR, Braakhuis BJM: Persistence of genetically altered fields in head and neck cancer patients: biological and clinical implications. Clin Cancer Res 2001, 7: 1523–1532). The aim of this study was to determine whether first and second primary tumors are clonally related and originate from a single genetically altered field. From 10 patients we analyzed the first tumor of the oral cavity or oropharynx, the >3-cm remote second primary tumor, and the mucosa from the tumor-free margins from both resection specimens. We compared TP53 mutations and loss of heterozygosity profiles using 19 microsatellite markers at chromosomes 3p, 9p, 13q, and 17p. In all patients, genetically altered mucosal lesions were detected in at least one resection margin from both first and second primary tumor. Evidence for a common clonal origin of the first tumor, second primary tumor, and the intervening mucosa was found for at least 6 of 10 patients. Our results indicate that a proportion of multiple primary tumors have developed within a single preneoplastic field. Based on different etiology and clinical consequences, we propose that independent second primary tumors should be distinguished from second field tumors, that arise from the same genetically altered field the first tumor has developed from

    Discordance of genetic alterations between primary head and neck tumors and corresponding metastases associated with mutational status of the TP53 gene

    No full text
    Ample molecular data are available on the progression from normal mucosa to invasive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but information on further genetic progression to metastatic disease is scarce. To obtain insight into the metastatic process, we compared 23 primary HNSCCs with 25 corresponding lymph node metastases (LNMs) and 10 corresponding distant metastases (DMs) with respect to TP53 mutations and patterns of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) based on 26 microsatellite markers on six chromosome arms (3p, 9p, 17p, 13q, 8p, and 18q). In 18 of the 23 patients, a TP53 mutation was detected in the primary tumor, and in all cases the same TP53 mutation was present in the corresponding LNM or DM. In nine of 20 patients with LNMs and three of seven patients with DMs, the LOH pattern of metastasis differed from that of the corresponding primary tumor by at least one marker. Microsatellite markers located on chromosome arms 13q, 8p, and 18q were most frequently discordant, providing evidence that alterations at these chromosomes occur late in HNSCC carcinogenesis. Moreover, evidence was found that DMs had developed directly from the primary tumor and not from LNMs. Remarkably, we observed that the mutational status of the TP53 gene is associated significantly with the degree of genetic differences between primary HNSCCs and corresponding metastases. All patients with TP53 wild-type primary tumors showed significantly more discordant LOH patterns in the corresponding LNMs and DMs than patients with TP53-mutated tumors. The percentages were 100% versus 27% (LNMs) and 100% versus 0% (DMs), respectively (P = 0.008 and P = 0.029; two-sided Fisher exact test). This finding suggests that TP53-mutated tumors need fewer additional genetic alterations to develop metastases compared with TP53 wild-type primary tumors

    Mutated p53 as a molecular marker for the diagnosis of head and neck cancer

    No full text
    In total, 10-30% of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) develop local recurrences despite seemingly adequate tumour resection. This may result from minimal residual cancer (MRC): small numbers of tumour cells left behind in the surgical margins, undetectable by routine histopathology. In recent studies, p53 mutations have been considered as selective and sensitive DNA markers of cancer cells. There are two potential problems in using mutated-p53 DNA as a marker. Firstly, p53 mutations occur early in progression and might therefore detect unresected precursor lesions besides tumour cells. Secondly, DNA is a very stable biomolecule that might lead to false-positive results. These two potential problems have been evaluated in this study. Fifty patients with a radical tumour resection were included, of whom 30 showed a p53 mutation in the primary tumour. Histopathologically tumour-free surgical margins were quantitatively analysed for mutated p53 by molecular diagnosis (plaque assay) and subsequent (immuno)histopathology. p53 mutated DNA was detected in the surgical margins of 19/30 patients. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of small tumour foci in 2/19 mutated p53-positive cases. In 7/19 cases, the tumour-specific p53 mutation was found in unresected dysplastic mucosal precursor lesions. Moreover, in a number of cases small p53-immunostained patches were detected, but the mutations found were never tumour-related. By screening contralateral exfoliated cells and plaque assays on RNA it was shown that detection of mutated-p53 DNA is prone to false-positive results. In conclusion, using p53 mutations as a marker, both MRC and unresected mutated p53-positive mucosal precursor lesions are detected within surgical margins. Molecular assessment of surgical margins using p53 mutations enables the selection of HNSCC patients at high risk for tumour recurrence, but tumour RNA seems at present to be a more specific biomolecule for analysis than tumour DNA
    corecore