Factores para la implementación de una Arquitectura Cloud Computing desde la Gestión Empresarial (ERP) y Modelos de Procesos de Negocio (BPM)

The research is developed in response to the need to study the relationships of enterprise resource management and its planning by the requirements and execution for implementation in a business management system (ERP) with Cloud Computing architecture for the business model of a company in the field of industrial processes. It was carried out by a documentary analysis, measurements and evaluations on the basis of the contractual services for availability, compliance with the corporate parameters defined by the initial, explored and implemented business process designs, as population and units of analysis, documents and analytical references of the projects, and functionality in the work areas.  The highest values were specified, of investment in consultancy for the implementation of investment in consultancy for the implementation with 55.10% of the initial budget, but in the execution the representation decreases in -2%, in the same way the behaviour of the licence service by subscription is analysed, which determines a 22. 35% for additional payroll as a percentage of the total budget, but which suffers a percentage variation decreased by -5.25%, the participation by reasonableness of these items, indicates decreases, however increases are observed in services for consulting and management of requirements of the IT area with increases of 3.40% and 1.09% respectively.Se desarrolla la investigación ante la necesidad de estudiar las relaciones de la gestión por recursos empresariales y su planificación por los requerimientos y ejecución para implementación en un sistema de gestión empresarial (ERP) con arquitectura Cloud Computing para el modelo de negocio de una empresa del rubro de procesos industriales. Se realizó por un análisis documental, las mediciones y evaluaciones que tiene como base los servicios contractuales para la disponibilidad, los cumplimientos de los parámetros corporativos definidos por los diseños de procesos de negocio iniciales, explorados e implementados, como población y unidades de análisis, los documentos y referencias analíticas de los proyectos, y funcionalidad en las áreas de trabajo.  Se especificó los mayores valores, de inversión en consultoría para la implementación inversión en consultoría para la implementación con un 55.10% del presupuesto inicial, pero en la ejecución la representación disminuye en -2%, de igual forma se analiza el comportamiento el servicio de licencia por suscripción, que determina un 22.35% por planilla adicional como porcentaje del presupuesto total, pero que sufre una variación porcentual decrementada en un -5.25%, la participación por razonabilidad de estos ítems, indica decrementos, sin embargo se observa incrementos en servicios para la consultoría y la gestión de requerimientos del área de TI con incrementos del 3.40% y 1.09% respectivamente

Optimising paediatric afferent component early warning systems : a hermeneutic systematic literature review and model development

Objective: To identify the core components of successful early warning systems for detecting and initiating action in response to clinical deterioration in paediatric inpatients. Methods: A hermeneutic systematic literature review informed by translational mobilisation theory and normalisation process theory was used to synthesise 82 studies of paediatric and adult early warning systems and interventions to support the detection of clinical deterioration and escalation of care. This method, which is designed to develop understanding, enabled the development of a propositional model of an optimal afferent component early warning system. Results: Detecting deterioration and initiating action in response to clinical deterioration in paediatric inpatients involves several challenges, and the potential failure points in early warning systems are well documented. Track and trigger tools (TTT) are commonly used and have value in supporting key mechanisms of action but depend on certain preconditions for successful integration into practice. Several supplementary interventions have been proposed to improve the effectiveness of early warning systems but there is limited evidence to recommend their wider use, due to the weight and quality of the evidence; the extent to which systems are conditioned by the local clinical context; and the need to attend to system component relationships, which do not work in isolation. While it was not possible to make empirical recommendations for practice, the review methodology generated theoretical inferences about the core components of an optimal system for early warning systems. These are presented as a propositional model conceptualised as three subsystems: detection, planning and action. Conclusions: There is a growing consensus of the need to think beyond TTTs in improving action to detect and respond to clinical deterioration. Clinical teams wishing to improve early warning systems can use the model to consider systematically the constellation of factors necessary to support detection, planning and action and consider how these arrangements can be implemented in their local context

Establishing and augmenting acceptability of the Fever trial: a mixed methods feasibility study

Introduction: Paediatric clinical trials in critical care settings are challenging to conduct. Establishing trial acceptability can help inform trial design and avoid research waste. This paper reports on how research with parents and staff established and augmented perspectives and the design of a trial investigating temperature thresholds in critically ill children with fever and infection (Fever trial). // Methods: We used a mixed methods approach to explore perspectives at three time points: 1) before, 2) during and 3) after a pilot trial. This included: 1) pre-trial focus groups with staff and interviews with parents; 2) questionnaires with parents of randomised children following trial recruitment; 3) post-trial interviews with parents and focus groups and a survey with staff. Data analysis drew on Sekhon et al (2017) theoretical framework of acceptability. // Results: 1) 25 parents were interviewed and 56 staff took part focus groups, 2) 60 parents of 57 randomised children took part in questionnaires, 3) 19 parents were interviewed and 50 staff took part in focus group and 48 in a survey. There was initial support for the trial, although both groups raised concerns regarding proposed thresholds and not using paracetamol for pain or discomfort. Pre-trial findings informed pilot trial protocol changes and training, which assisted practitioner ‘buy in’. However, concerns about children being in pain or discomfort when weaned from ventilation led to cases of withdrawal and protocol non-adherence. Nevertheless, 95% of parents provided consent and all supported the trial. Those trained by the Fever team found the trial more acceptable than those trained by colleagues. Trusting parent and staff relationships were linked to trial acceptability. // Conclusions: Pre-trial findings and pilot trial experience augmented perspectives, providing insight into how challenges may be overcome. The proposed trial was deemed feasible. We present an adapted theoretical framework of acceptability to inform the design of future trial feasibility studies

Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial): a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVE: To explore parent and staff views on the acceptability of a randomised controlled trial investigating temperature thresholds for antipyretic intervention in critically ill children with fever and infection (the FEVER trial) during a multi-phase pilot study. DESIGN: Mixed methods study with data collected at three time points: (1) before, (2) during and (3) after a pilot trial. SETTING: English, Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs). PARTICIPANTS: (1) Pre-pilot trial focus groups with pilot site staff (n=56) and interviews with parents (n=25) whose child had been admitted to PICU in the last 3 years with a fever and suspected infection, (2) Questionnaires with parents of randomised children following pilot trial recruitment (n=48 from 47 families) and (3) post-pilot trial interviews with parents (n=19), focus groups (n=50) and a survey (n=48) with site staff. Analysis drew on Sekhon et al's theoretical framework of acceptability. RESULTS: There was initial support for the trial, yet some held concerns regarding the proposed temperature thresholds and not using paracetamol for pain or discomfort. Pre-trial findings informed protocol changes and training, which influenced views on trial acceptability. Staff trained by the FEVER team found the trial more acceptable than those trained by colleagues. Parents and staff found the trial acceptable. Some concerns about pain or discomfort during weaning from ventilation remained. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-trial findings and pilot trial experience influenced acceptability, providing insight into how challenges may be overcome. We present an adapted theoretical framework of acceptability to inform future trial feasibility studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: ISRCTN16022198 and NCT03028818

Sedation AND Weaning In Children (SANDWICH): protocol for a cluster randomised stepped wedge trial.

Introduction: Weaning from ventilation is a complex process involving several stages that include recognition of patient readiness to begin the weaning process; steps to reduce ventilation while optimising sedation in order not to induce distress; and removing the endotracheal tube. Delay at any stage can prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation. We developed a multi-component intervention targeted at helping clinicians to safely expedite this process and minimise the harms associated with unnecessary mechanical ventilation. Methods and analysis: This is a 20-month cluster-randomised stepped wedge clinical and cost-effectiveness trial with an internal pilot and a process evaluation. It is being conducted in 18 paediatric intensive care units in the UK to evaluate a protocol-based intervention for reducing the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation. Following an initial eight-week baseline data collection period in all sites, one site will be randomly chosen to transition to the intervention every four weeks and will start an eight-week training period after which it will continue the intervention for the remaining duration of the study. We aim to recruit approximately 10,000 patients. The primary analysis will compare data from before the training (control) with that from after the training (intervention) in each site. Full details of the analyses will be in the statistical analysis plan. Ethics and dissemination: This Protocol was reviewed and approved by NRES Committee East Midlands - Nottingham 1 Research Ethics Committee (reference: 17/EM/0301). All sites started patient recruitment on 5 February 2018 before randomisation in April 2018. Results will be disseminated in 2020. The results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in peer reviewed medical journals

Routine gastric residual volume measurement to guide enteral feeding in mechanically ventilated infants and children : the GASTRIC feasibility study

Background The routine measurement of gastric residual volume to guide the initiation and delivery of enteral feeding, is widespread in paediatric intensive care and neonatal units, but has little underlying evidence to support it. Objective(s) To answer the question: Is it feasible to conduct a trial of not measuring gastric residual volume on clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated infants and children in the UK? Design A mixed methods study involving five linked work packages in two parallel arms, neonatal units and paediatric intensive care units. 1. A survey of units to establish current UK practice. 2. qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals and caregivers of children admitted to either setting. 3. A modified two-round e-Delphi survey to investigate health care professionals’ opinions on trial design issues and to obtain consensus on outcomes. 4. National databases were examined to determine the potential eligible populations. 5. Two consensus meetings, of health care professionals and parents to review the data and agreed consensus on outcomes that had not reached consensus in the e-Delphi. Participants and setting Parents of children with experience of ventilation and tube feeding in both neonatal units and in paediatric intensive care units, and health care professionals working in neonatal units and paediatric intensive care units. Results Baseline surveys showed the practice of gastric residual volume measurement was very common: 96% PICUs and 65% in neonatal units. Ninety percent of parents both from neonatal units and paediatric intensive care units supported a future trial, whilst highlighting concerns around possible delays in detecting complications. Health care professionals also indicated a trial was feasible, with 84% of staff willing to participate in a trial. Concerns expressed by junior nurses about the intervention arm of not measuring gastric residual volumes were addressed by developing a simple flowchart and education package. The trial design survey and e-Delphi study gained consensus on trial 12 PICU and 9 neonatal unit outcome measures and identified acceptable inclusion and exclusion criteria. Given the differences in physiology, disease processes, environments, staffing and outcomes of interest, two different trials are required in the two settings. Database analyses subsequently showed trials were feasible in both settings in terms of patient numbers. Of 16222 children who met the inclusion criteria in PICU 12 629 stayed > 3 days. In neonatal units, 15 375 neonates <32 weeks age. Finally, the two consensus meetings demonstrated ‘buy in’ from the wider UK neonatal communities and paediatric intensive care units and enabled us to discuss and vote on the outcomes that did not achieve consensus in the e-Delphi study. Conclusions and future work Two separate UK trials (one in neonatal units and one in paediatric intensive care units) are feasible to conduct, but they cannot be combined due to differences in outcome measures and treatment protocols, reflecting the distinctness of the two specialties

FIRST-line support for assistance in breathing in children (FIRST-ABC) : a master protocol of two randomised trials to evaluate the non-inferiority of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for non-invasive respiratory support in paediatric critical care

Introduction Even though respiratory support is a common intervention in paediatric critical care, there is no randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence regarding the effectiveness of two commonly used modes of non-invasive respiratory support (NRS), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula therapy (HFNC). FIRST-ABC is a master protocol of two pragmatic non-inferiority RCTs to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of HFNC (compared to CPAP) as the first-line mode of support in critically ill children. Methods and analysis We will recruit participants over a 30-month period at 25 UK paediatric critical care units (paediatric intensive care units/high dependency units). Patients are eligible if admitted/accepted for admission, aged >36 weeks corrected gestational age and <16 years, and assessed by the treating clinician to require non-invasive respiratory support for an acute illness (step-up RCT) or within 72 hours of extubation following a period of invasive ventilation (step-down RCT). Due to the emergency nature of the treatment, written informed consent will be deferred to after randomisation. Randomisation will occur 1:1 to CPAP or HFNC, stratified by site and age (<12 vs. ≥12 months). The primary outcome is time to liberation from respiratory support for a continuous period of 48 hours. A total sample size of 600 patients in each RCT will provide 90% power with a type I error rate of 2.5% (one-sided) to exclude the pre-specified noninferiority margin of hazard ratio of 0.75. Primary analyses will be undertaken separately in each RCT in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. Ethics and dissemination This master protocol received favourable ethical opinion from NHS East of England - Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee (reference: 19/EE/0185) and approval from the Health Research Authority (reference: 260536). Results will be disseminated via publications in peer reviewed medical journals and presentations at national and international conferences. Trial registration ISRCTN60048867; Pre-results

Establishing and augmenting views on the acceptability of a paediatric critical care randomised controlled trial (the FEVER trial) : a mixed methods study

Objective: To explore parent and staff views on the acceptability of a randomised controlled trial investigating temperature thresholds for antipyretic intervention in critically ill children with fever and infection (the FEVER trial) during a multi-phase pilot study. Design: Mixed methods study with data collected at three time points: (1) before, (2) during and (3) after a pilot trial. Setting: English, Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs). Participants: (1) Pre-pilot trial focus groups with pilot site staff (n=56) and interviews with parents (n=25) whose child had been admitted to PICU in the last 3 years with a fever and suspected infection, (2) Questionnaires with parents of randomised children following pilot trial recruitment (n=48 from 47 families) and (3) post-pilot trial interviews with parents (n=19), focus groups (n=50) and a survey (n=48) with site staff. Analysis drew on Sekhon et al’s theoretical framework of acceptability. Results: There was initial support for the trial, yet some held concerns regarding the proposed temperature thresholds and not using paracetamol for pain or discomfort. Pre-trial findings informed protocol changes and training, which influenced views on trial acceptability. Staff trained by the FEVER team found the trial more acceptable than those trained by colleagues. Parents and staff found the trial acceptable. Some concerns about pain or discomfort during weaning from ventilation remained. Conclusions: Pre-trial findings and pilot trial experience influenced acceptability, providing insight into how challenges may be overcome. We present an adapted theoretical framework of acceptability to inform future trial feasibility studies. Trial registration numbers: ISRCTN16022198 and NCT03028818

Paediatric early warning systems: not a simple answer to a complex question.

Paediatric early warning systems (PEWS) to reduce in-hospital mortality have been a laudable endeavour. Evaluation of their impact has rarely examined the internal validity of the components of PEWS in achieving desired outcomes. We highlight the assumptions made regarding the mode of action of PEWS and, as PEWS become more commonplace, this paper asks whether we really understand their function, process and outcome. [Abstract copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.