Atherosclerotic renovascular disease in United States patients aged 67 years or older: Risk factors, revascularization, and prognosis

Atherosclerotic renovascular disease in United States patients aged 67 years or older: Risk factors, revascularization, and prognosis.BackgroundAlthough atherosclerotic renovascular disease is increasingly recognized in chronic kidney disease, few national level studies have examined its clinical epidemiology.MethodsClaims data from a 5% random sample of the United States Medicare population were used to select patients without atherosclerotic renovascular disease in the 2 years preceding December 31, 1999 (N = 1,085,250), followed until December 31, 2001.ResultsThe incidence of atherosclerotic renovascular disease was 3.7 per 1000 patient-years. Major antecedent associations [P < 0.05, with adjusted hazards ratios (HR) > 1.5] included chronic kidney disease (adjusted HR 2.54), hypertension (2.42), peripheral vascular disease (2.00), and atherosclerotic heart disease (1.70). Adverse event rates after incident atherosclerotic renovascular disease greatly exceeded those in the general population (P < 0.0001): atherosclerotic heart disease, 303.9 per 1000 patient-years (vs. 73.5 in the general population); peripheral vascular disease, 258.6 (vs. 52.2); congestive heart failure, 194.5 (vs. 56.3); cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, 175.5 (vs. 52.9); death, 166.3 (vs. 63.3); and renal replacement therapy, 28.8 (vs. 1.3). Among atherosclerotic renovascular disease patients, 16.2% underwent a renal revascularization procedure, percutaneously in 96%. Revascularization was not associated with renal replacement therapy, congestive heart failure, or death but was associated with atherosclerotic heart disease (adjusted HR 1.42) (P = 0.004) and peripheral vascular disease (adjusted HR 1.38) (P = 0.002).ConclusionAtherosclerotic renovascular disease is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease, both past and future. Absolute cardiovascular risk exceeds that of renal replacement therapy. Renal revascularization is used selectively and shows inconsistent associations with cardiovascular outcomes, renal replacement therapy, and death

Primary and tertiary health professionals' views on the health-care of patients with co-morbid diabetes and chronic kidney disease - A qualitative study

Background: Health-care for co-morbid diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often sub-optimal. To improve health-care, we explored the perspectives of general practitioners (GPS) and tertiary health-care professionals concerning key factors influencing health-care of diabetes and CKD. Methods: A total of 65 health professionals were purposively sampled from Australia's 2 largest cities to participate in focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Four focus groups were conducted with GPS who referred to 4 tertiary health services in Australia's 2 largest cities, with 6 focus groups conducted with tertiary health-care professionals from the 4 tertiary health services. An additional 8 semi-structured interviews were performed with specialist physicians who were heads of diabetes and renal units. All discussions were facilitated by the same researcher, with discussions digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. All qualitative data was thematically analysed independently by 2 researchers. Results: Both GPS and tertiary health-care professionals emphasised the importance of primary care and that optimal health-care was an inter-play between patient self-management and primary health-care, with specialist tertiary health-care support. Patient self-management, access to specialty care, coordination of care and a preventive approach were identified as key factors that influence healthcare and require improvement. Both groups suggested that an integrated specialist diabetes-kidney service could improve care. Unit heads emphasised the importance of quality improvement activities. Conclusions: GPS and tertiary health-care professionals emphasised the importance of patient self-management and primary care involvement in the health-care of diabetes and CKD. Supporting GPS with an accessible, multidisciplinary diabetes-renal health service underpinned by strong communication pathways, a preventive approach and quality improvement activities, may improve health-care and patient outcomes in co-morbid diabetes and CKD

Erthropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness

Approximately 5-10% of patients with chronic kidney disease demonstrate hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), defined as a continued need for greater than 300 IU/kg per week erythropoietin or 1.5 mug/kg per week darbepoetin administered by the subcutaneous route. Such hyporesponsiveness contributes significantly to morbidity, mortality and health-care economic burden in chronic kidney disease and represents an important diagnostic and management challenge. The commonest causes of ESA resistance are non-compliance, absolute or functional iron deficiency and inflammation. It is widely accepted that maintaining adequate iron stores, ideally by administering iron parenterally, is the most important strategy for reducing the requirements for, and enhancing the efficacy of ESA. There have been recent epidemiologic studies linking parenteral iron therapy to an increased risk of infection and atherosclerosis, although other investigations have refuted this. Inflammatory ESA hyporesponsiveness has been reported to be improved by a number of interventions, including the use of biocompatible membranes, ultrapure dialysate, transplant nephrectomy, ascorbic acid therapy, vitamin E supplementation, statins and oxpentifylline administration. Other variably well-established causes of ESA hyporesponsiveness include inadequate dialysis, hyperparathyroidism, nutrient deficiencies (vitamin B12, folate, vitamin C, carnitine), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, aluminium overload, antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia, primary bone marrow disorders, myelosuppressive agents, haemoglobinopathies, haemolysis and hypersplenism. This paper reviews the causes of ESA hyporesponsiveness and the clinical evidence for proposed therapeutic interventions. A practical algorithm for approaching the investigation and management of patients with ESA hyporesponsiveness is also provided