Efektivitas Peran Hakim sebagai Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Mahkamah Syar\u27iyah Jantho

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan menyatakan bahwa mediasi merupakan salah satu tahapan proses persidangan di pengadilan. Dalam pelaksanaanya terdapat beberapa hambatan di MahkamahSyar\u27iyah Jantho. Faktor penyebabnya yaitu pertama, pelaksanaan mediasi belum mengacu pada prosedur mediasi yang sudah ditentukan, keseriusan hakim mediator belum maksimal, itikad baik dari para pihak dan hakim mediator kurang serius. kedua, kualitas perkara sudah cukup berat, para pihak yang berperkara sebelum masalahnya tersebut sampai ke Mahkamah Syar\u27iyah Jantho sudah ditangani beberapa kali baik oleh pihak non formal maupun formal. Ketiga, kurangnya pemahaman para pihak terhadap pentingnya proses mediasi. Keempat, Ada anggapan dari Hakim mediator bahwa tugas menjadi mediator adalah tugas tambahan yang terasa terbebani baginya, juga menganggap dengan proses mediasi akan memperlambat putusnya perkara dan akan mempengaruhi nilainya sebagai hakim.The Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 1, 2016 on the Mediation Procedure in a Trial states that mediation is one of the process stages in a trial. There are several obstacles found in the mediation process at the Sharia Court of Jantho. These are resulted from firstly, it has not been referring to the mediation procedure, the judge mediators\u27 efforts have not been maximal yet, the parties good faith and the mediator judges are less serious. Secondly, the case is serious enough, the litigants have asked the cases solved by both non-formal and formal parties several times. Thirdly, the lack of understanding of the parties to the importance of the process. Finally, there is a presumption by the judges mediating the cases that being a mediator is an additional task that is not easy, and some assume that the process slowing the decision and devalue judge\u27s roles

Peranan Hakim Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian di Mahkamah Syar'iyah

Pasal 4 ayat (1) dan (2) Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 menyatakan bahwa wajib terlebih dahulu diupayakan penyelesaian melalui mediasi, begitu pula Pasal 17 ayat (1) Hakim Pemeriksa Perkara mewajibkan Para Pihak menempuh Mediasi. Karena Mediasi diharapkan menjadi wadah pilihan untuk memperoleh solusi yang didasarkan pada kepentingan dan kebutuhan pihak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menjelaskan peranan dan hambatan hakim mediator serta untuk mengetahui upaya yang dilakukan untuk mencegah dan mengatasi terjadinya hambatan tersebut. Jenis penelitian dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui penelitian kepustakaan untuk data sekunder dan penelitian untuk memperoleh data primer. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah kualitatif. Berdasarkan penelitian diketahui peranan hakim mediator dalam menangani perkara/sengketa sudah berjalan, namun belum optimal. Terbukti dari 18 (delapan belas) kasus, jumlah kasus yang selesai melalui mediasi hanya 2 (dua) kasus, sedangkan tahun 2016 sampai 2017 belum ada kasus yang selesai melalui mediasi. Hal tersebut disebabkan jumlah mediator yang terbatas dan kurang memiliki kapastitas sumber daya yang memadai. Upaya untuk mencegahnya berupa sosialisasi manfaat mediasi dan mengikuti pelatihan mediasi serta mediasi harus dilakukan secara profesional. Ketua Mahkamah Syar'iyah Banda Aceh hendaknya melakukan sosialisasi manfaat Mediasi, dan Mahkamah Agung RI hendaknya mengevaluasi praktik mediasi dan menambah jumlah hakim.Article 4 paragraph (1) and (2) Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 states that it must first be pursued a settlement through mediation, as well as Article 17 paragraph (1) of the Judicial Examining Judge requiring the Parties to take Mediation. Because Mediation is expected to be a container of choice to obtain solutions that are based on the interests and needs of the parties. This research aims to know and explain the roles of mediator judges and obstacles faced by the judgesin settling the dispute of marital propertiesafter the divorce at Mahkamah Syar'iyah of Banda Aceh. This research also aims to know the efforts done to prevent and handlethe hurdles in settling the disputes post-divorce at Mahkamah Syar'iyah of Banda Aceh. This is juridical empirical research. The data are collectedthrough library research in order to obtain secondary data and field research is conducted in order to obtain primary data.This research applies qualitative analysis. Based on the research, it is known that the role of mediator judges in handling cases / disputes is already underway, but not optimal. It is evident from 18 cases, the number of cases completed through mediation is only 2 cases, whereas in 2016 until 2017 there have been no cases completed through mediation. This is due to the limited number of mediators and lack of adequate resource capacity. Efforts to prevent it in the form of socializing the benefits of mediation and participating in mediation and mediation training must be carried out professionally. The Chairperson of the Banda Aceh Syar'iyah Court should disseminate the benefits of Mediation, and the Indonesian Supreme Court should evaluate the practice of mediation and increase the number of judges

Sharia-Based Regional Regulations in the Indonesian National Law System

This study aimed to explain the existence of sharia-based regional regulations and discuss the form of legal system regulation of sharia-based regional regulations in Indonesia. After the reformation, changes in the legal system in Indonesia began, especially the change from a centralized pattern to a decentralized one and the granting of regional autonomy authority, this was marked by the issuance of regional regulations based on the needs of each region. The next problem is the emergence of the desire to establish sharia-based regional regulations such as in Aceh, South Sulawesi, and West Java which invites legal discourse on the legal system in Indonesia. This study used a qualitative method with a normative legal approach. The subjects of this study were the namely elements of the Central and Regional Government, and Members of the DPRD. In addition, information was also collected from scholars, academics, and legal practitioners. The research procedure was carried out in four steps: observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. The data were analyzed using an inductive model. The research findings showed that; first, the implementation of post-reform Islamic Shari'a cannot be separated from the increase in democratic life in Indonesia. Second, the application of Islamic Shari'a is the desire of the community as the foundation and order of social, national, and religious life. Third, the application of sharia-based regional regulations in addition to being elite political capital is also part of increasing identity and cultural revival and social life of the community

PEMENUHAN NAFKAH ANAK PASCA PERCERAIAN

Living as a child That must be carried out by the father accordingly with rule jurisprudence and law positivity. More mainly Again If has decided by the panel of judges own strength law. However in practice, the public still found neglect in living with children, as happened in Gampong Miruek Lamreudeup, District Baitussalam, Aceh Besar Regency. This study is about the implementation of living children post-divorce in the District Baitussalam, Aceh Besar Regency and for knowing effort law what can be done by a mother if there is no fulfillment of living children  post-divorce.Study This includes a type of study field (field research), which is of the nature of juridical empirical. This study was carried out in Gampong Miruek Lamreudeup, District Baitussalam, Aceh Besar Regency. Research results can be mentioned 1. There are several forms: a. Party For fulfillment, a living child after divorce, just a mother from the child (ex wife) and assisted by parents from the party  mother. Husband doesn't give a living to child because domiciled husband is not known by the wife; however, duly known husband fills the decision panel of judges. b. a livelihood child borne by the mother half a day and a half a day again by the ex husband (father). 2. Possible legal remedies done If there is no living child post-divorce, then the party mother can finish it through apparatus village local. If at level village no can be resolved, then party mother in the matter as the winning side can submit the lawsuit fulfillment obligation of giving the living maintenance child to Court Sharia. Furthermore Court Sharia will do execution in case living child. The Execution of the judge's decision has been made a powerful law, but it is still the final process in the civil or criminal case in court

A Procedure of Dispute Resolution at Village Adat Institution in Seunudon Sub-District of North Aceh Regency

When a dispute occurred in the community, village leaders always intervened to solve it with or without being asked the parties by using a certain dispute resolution procedures. This current research was developed to determine the procedures of dispute resolution by the village adat institutions. By using the empirical juridical method, document analysis, field survey, and interviews with the people and leaders of adat institutions, for primary data; while the literature study includes the study of laws and regulations related to the secondary data; and then all data was analyzed by descriptive method. The results of research shown that the dispute resolution was conducted by keuchik of gampong or other adat institutional leaders as justice of the peace with a certain procedure; the dispute resolution procedures may differ between one village and another village. Nowadays, no one has a written guideline in adat dispute resolution that can be used by the leaders of adat institutions. Hence it requires a regulation (qanun) as the legal basis of the dispute resolution procedures by adat institutions. Keywords: Procedure, Dispute Resolution, Adat Institution, Gampong, Aceh

KESADARAN HUKUM MASYARAKAT TERHADAP PERCERAIAN DI DEPAN SIDANG MAHKAMAH SYAR’IYAH BLANGKEJEREN

In the community of Blangkejeren District, Gayo Lues Regency, divorces are still found outside the Syar'iyah Court even though Law no. 16 of 2019 and the Compilation of Islamic Law have determined that every divorce must be carried out before a court hearing. Therefore, the main problem in this research is why people in Blangkejeren District divorce outside the Syar'iyah Court hearing and what is the level of legal awareness of the people in Blangkejeren District who divorce before the Syar'iyah Court hearing.  Each research is expected to provide certain benefits, both theoretically and practically. The benefits of this research are theoretically useful for the development of science, for practitioners at the Sharia Court, and society. This research uses normative legal research methods (normative juridical) and sociological legal research (empirical juridical). The nature of this research is analytical descriptive, meaning a data analysis based on general legal theory applied to explain other data sets. To obtain accurate and relevant data, data collection was carried out using normative empirical methods. This research was conducted in Blangkejeren District, Gayo Lues Regency regarding public legal awareness regarding divorce before the Syar'iyah Court trial. Where public awareness is considered to be relatively high, this is proven by the behavior of the people of Blangkejeren District who take care of their divorce certificates. However, there are still people who are reluctant to apply for a divorce certificate due to factors such as public legal awareness, understanding of legal rules that have been ingrained since childhood, the separation between religious rules and state rules, requiring quite a long time, and the weak economic conditions of the community. &nbsp

Gender Justice in Inheritance Distribution Practices in South Aceh, Indonesia

This paper explores the practices of inheritance distribution among the people of South Aceh who commonly divide inheritance property based on customary inheritance law. Heirs receive their shares of inheritance not according to Islamic law (furudh al-muqaddarah), as both male and female heirs earn equal portions. The study of this paper aims to examine the concept of Islamic inheritance law from the perspective of gender equity, the pattern of interaction and formation of customary inheritance law in social institutions, and the basis for the community beliefs in dividing inheritance according to the custom and culture of South Aceh. The study obtained data by observing the practices of inheritance distribution in South Aceh and conducting in-depth interviews with the community figures, the representatives of Ulema Consultative Assembly (Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama/MPU), and the judges at the Tapaktuan Sharia Court using an empirical juridical approach. The results of the study revealed that the concept of Islamic inheritance law has been an alternative and in line with the principle of gender justice for women in South Aceh as a manifestation of the principle of balanced justice. This principle has been reflected in the patterns of inheritance distribution through the respective customary law mechanisms in accordance with the agreement of all heirs. The people in South Aceh have preferred to divide inheritance through the customary law as it has been more flexible and taken into account the socio-economic conditions and values developed in their community