23 research outputs found

    Symbolic Planning for Industrial Applications : the eRobotics Approach

    Get PDF
    Histological evidence of Plasmodium in the placenta is indicative of placental malaria, a condition associated with severe outcomes for mother and child. Histological lesions found in placentas from Plasmodium-exposed women include syncytial knotting, syncytial rupture, thickening of the placental barrier, necrosis of villous tissue and intervillositis. These histological changes have been associated with P. falciparum infections, but little is known about the contribution of P. vivax to such changes. We conducted a cross-sectional study with pregnant women at delivery and assigned them to three groups according to their Plasmodium exposure during pregnancy: no Plasmodium exposure (n = 41), P. vivax exposure (n = 59) or P. falciparum exposure (n = 19). We evaluated their placentas for signs of Plasmodium and placental lesions using ten histological parameters: syncytial knotting, syncytial rupture, placental barrier thickness, villi necrosis, intervillous space area, intervillous leucocytes, intervillous mononucleates, intervillous polymorphonucleates, parasitized erythrocytes and hemozoin. Placentas from P. vivax-exposed women showed little evidence of Plasmodium or hemozoin but still exhibited more lesions than placentas from women not exposed to Plasmodium, especially when infections occurred twice or more during pregnancy. In the Brazilian state of Acre, where diagnosis and primary treatment are readily available and placental lesions occur in the absence of detected placental parasites, relying on the presence of Plasmodium in the placenta to evaluate Plasmodium-induced placental pathology is not feasible. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that syncytial knotting (odds ratio [OR], 4.21, P = 0.045), placental barrier thickness (OR, 25.59, P = 0.021) and mononuclear cells (OR, 4.02, P = 0.046) were increased in placentas from P. vivax-exposed women when compared to women not exposed to Plasmodium during pregnancy. A vivax-score was developed using these three parameters (and not evidence of Plasmodium) that differentiates between placentas from P. vivax-exposed and unexposed women. This score illustrates the importance of adequate management of P. vivax malaria during pregnancy

    Results and univariate analysis of the placental parameters, evaluated by histology, according to the species of <i>Plasmodium</i> infection during pregnancy<sup>†</sup>.

    No full text
    †<p>Women were grouped according to their malaria diagnoses during pregnancy, based on microscopy data. (IQ) 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentile. (n) number of women. (%) percentage (N/A) not applicable. For differences between groups all continuous variables were Ln-transformed and one-way ANOVA tests with Bonferroni post-tests were performed. Chi<sup>2</sup> tests were used to evaluate differences in categorical variables between groups. Refer to the “methods section” for a full description of how each parameter was measured.</p>*<p><i>P. falciparum</i> vs. No Malaria, P = 0.004.</p>§<p><i>P. falciparum</i> vs. <i>P. vivax</i>, P = 0.005.</p>°<p><i>P. falciparum</i> vs. No Malaria, P = 0.048.</p>#<p>χ<sup>2</sup> test: <i>P.</i> vivax or <i>P.</i> falciparum, P<0.001.</p

    The placental parameters evaluated by <i>Plasmodium</i> species during infection.

    No full text
    <p>For all placentas, areas of necrosis (B) and intervillous space (C) were measured by overlaying a square grid (A) and counting the number of intersecting points that touched necrotic areas (yellow dots; the white circle indicates an example) or intervillous space areas (blue dots; the black circle indicates an example). The ratios of intervillous space area per necrosis (D) and intervillous space area per placental barrier thickness (E) were calculated. The placentas in the “no plasmodium” group (n = 41; white boxes) appear to have similar necrotic areas and more intervillous space than the placentas in the “P. vivax” group (n = 59; red boxes). The placentas in the “P. falciparum” group (n = 19; grey boxes) exhibited more necrotic areas and less intervillous space. Graphs (B, C, D and E) represent the transformed data. The boxes represent the mean and standard deviation values. The whiskers represent the 5<sup>th</sup> and 95<sup>th</sup> percentiles. The photograph was taken using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 light microscope equipped with a Zeiss Axio Cam HRc. Grid overlays and counts were performed using Image J.</p

    The immune-cell parameters evaluated by <i>Plasmodium</i> species during infection.

    No full text
    <p>The percentage of immune cells present in the intervillous space of the placentas evaluated (A) was calculated after counting a total of 500 intervillous space cells. Total leucocytes percentage (B), mononuclear cells percentage (C) and polymorphonuclear cells percentage (D) were plotted against <i>Plasmodium</i> exposure during pregnancy, assessed by microscopy. The placentas from the “no plasmodium” group (n = 41; white boxes) appear to have less immune cells present in the intervillous space than the placentas from the “P. vivax” group (n = 59; red boxes) and the placentas from the “P. falciparum” group (n = 19; grey boxes). * ANOVA test, P-value = 0,039. Graphs (B, C, and D) represent the transformed data. The boxes represent the mean and standard deviation values. The whiskers represent the 5<sup>th</sup> and 95<sup>th</sup> percentiles. The photograph was taken using a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 light microscope equipped with a Zeiss Axio Cam HRc. Grid overlays and counts were performed using Image J.</p

    The placental score differentiates the women who were exposed to <i>P. vivax</i> during pregnancy.

    No full text
    <p>A score (termed the ‘vivax-score’) was developed and applied to all of the placental samples in this study (see main text for details). (A) The placental samples from the “no Plasmodium” group (n = 41, white box) revealed a significantly lower score than the placentas from the “P. vivax” group (n = 59, red box) (* Mann-Whitney, P = 0.027). (B) The vivax-score increased significantly (** Cuzick's trend test: z = 2.76, P = 0.006) with increased exposure to <i>P. vivax</i> during pregnancy. “No infection”, n = 41; “1 infection”, n = 39; “2+ infections”, n = 20).</p

    Cuzick's trend test analysis of placental changes across ordered groups by number of <i>P. vivax</i> infections during pregnancy<sup>†</sup>.

    No full text
    †<p>Women were divided according to the number of <i>P. vivax</i> infections that were diagnosed microscopically during pregnancy.</p>a<p>Cuzick's trend test was performed across the ordered groups: no <i>P. vivax</i> infection (0), one <i>P. vivax</i> infection (1) and two or more <i>P. vivax</i> infections (2+). (z) Measure and direction of tendency.</p

    Characteristics of the women who participated in the study according to infection status<sup>†</sup>.

    No full text
    †<p>Women were grouped according to their malaria diagnoses during pregnancy, based on microscopy data. (SD) standard deviation. (IQ) 25<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentile. (n) number of women with data recorded. (%) percentage of total women in each group. (Hb) hemoglobin. (Ep.) number of episodes. (N/A) not applicable. Anemia: Hb<11 g/dL. Low birth weight: birth weight<2,500 g. 2+ infections during pregnancy: women with two or more infections detected over the duration of the pregnancy. Month of infection: Gestation month of first diagnosed infection. Trimester of infection: percentage of infections that were detected per trimester of gestation.</p>◊<p>Student's t-test: <i>P. falciparum</i> vs. no malaria, P = 0.015.</p>‱<p>Student's t-test: <i>P. falciparum</i> vs. <i>P. vivax</i>, P = 0.029.</p>§<p>χ<sup>2</sup> test: no malaria vs. <i>P.</i> vivax or <i>P.</i> falciparum, P<<0.001.</p
    corecore