Urgensi fatwa dalam perkembangan hukum Islam

The discussion of this writing is about the role of fatwa in the development of Islamic law. Fatwa is the product of mujtahids’thought to answer particular problems which emerge among societies. Fatwa is closely related to pro and contra differences, it is due to several factors, namely: different reference or quotation of hadits because of condition and place, the difference of understanding the text, methodology, socio-cultural levels, socio-historical and social stratification of the society where mujtahids live and the subjectivity of imams. Owever, the difference becomes a contribution within the development of Islamic law itself.due to the dispute, new ideas or thoughts emerge in Islamic law, as a result, Islamic law can be dynamic law and it can be applied for long. Pembahasan dalam tulisan ini adalah tentang peranan fatwa dalam perkembangan Hukum Islam. Fatwa merupakan produk dari pemikiran para Mujtahid untuk menjawab berbagai persoalan yang muncul ditengah-tengah masyarakat. Fatwa tidak dapat terlepas dari perbedaan pro dan konta. Hal ini disebabkan karena beberapa faktor; perbedaan rujukan atau kutipan nash/hadis karena kondisi dan tempat, perbedaan memahami nash, perbedaan pengetahuan yang mereka miliki (metodologi), perbedaan tingkat sosio cultural, sosio historis dan stratifikasi masyarakat tempat mereka berdomisili, subyektivitas para imam. Namun demikian pro dan kontra yang terjadi menjadi sebuah kontribusi dalam perkembangan pemikiran hokum Islam itu sendiri, hal ini dikarenakan dengan terjadinya pro dan kontra, dapat menimbulkan pemikiran-pemikiran baru dalam hokum Islam, sehingga hokum Islam dapat menjadi hukum yang dinamis dan berlaku sepanjang masa

Social Justice and Humanity on Polygamous Marriage at The Religious Court of Pasuruan - Indonesia

Polygamy can be granted if it meets one of the alternative conditions and the absolute cumulative condition. However, sometimes alternative terms are used as wrappers for other reasons to look ridiculous, such as humanity. This paper examines three polygamy rulings at the Pasuruan Religious Court in 2019 using the three Indonesia Women Ulama Congress (KUPI) fatwa approaches ma’ruf, mubadalah, and ultimate justice. The article finds that the reason for public justice is used to wrap up humanitarian reasons. In the ma’ruf approach, the standard of public justice as the basis for judges' consideration needs to be more precise because it does not refer to the global public experience. These standards are not in harmony with the decent logic of women in general. The Mubadalah approach ensures a balanced interpretation and interplay of public justice and humanity. The judge’s reasoning for considering standards of public justice and humanity based on patriarchal paradigms deserves to be criticized. The ultimate justice approach illustrates that the judge's reasoning is not based on women's biological, sociological, and anthropological life experiences in the case of polygamy. Using justice and justifying humanitarian reasons in some polygamy rulings in the Pasuruan Religious Court does not yet have a solid basic legal paradig

Interpretasi hadis moderatisme di kalangan mahasiswa dan implikasinya pada gerakan inversi-radikalisasi

Many studies have cited the massiveness of radical understanding among students in universities. Not only students from public universities, but also come from religious colleges such as UIN and IAIN. Therefore, this study aims; first, to analyze the hadith interpretation of Islamic moderates among students. second, knowing the implementation of indications of religious moderates among students. Third, knowing the implications of the interpretation of Islamic moderates among students on the inversion-radicalization movement in Indonesia. All interview questions refer to the four pillars of indication of religious moderation initiated by the MORA, namely national commitment, tolerance, non-violence, and acceptance of local culture. This type of study is qualitative, and the approach chosen is hadith-phenomenological. The method used in this study consists of three main methods. First, the descriptive method; second, the critic-analysis method; third, the critic-analysis-reflective. The results of this study provide information that the interpretation of Islamic moderatism among students has a variety of languages interpreted by each student. As for interpreting the hadith, many of them still do not understand and understand the content of the hadith. Based on questionnaire data, none of the students were free from indications of radicalism. The implications of these findings provide clues to the importance of fostering and socializing ideologies and instilling attitudes of moderation among students

Interpretasi hadis moderatisme di kalangan mahasiswa dan implikasinya pada gerakan inversi-radikalisasi

Many studies have cited the massiveness of radical understanding among students in universities. Not only students from public universities, but also come from religious colleges such as UIN and IAIN. Therefore, this study aims; first, to analyze the hadith interpretation of Islamic moderates among students. second, knowing the implementation of indications of religious moderates among students. Third, knowing the implications of the interpretation of Islamic moderates among students on the inversion-radicalization movement in Indonesia. All interview questions refer to the four pillars of indication of religious moderation initiated by the MORA, namely national commitment, tolerance, non-violence, and acceptance of local culture. This type of study is qualitative, and the approach chosen is hadith-phenomenological. The method used in this study consists of three main methods. First, the descriptive method; second, the critic-analysis method; third, the critic-analysis-reflective. The results of this study provide information that the interpretation of Islamic moderatism among students has a variety of languages interpreted by each student. As for interpreting the hadith, many of them still do not understand and understand the content of the hadith. Based on questionnaire data, none of the students were free from indications of radicalism. The implications of these findings provide clues to the importance of fostering and socializing ideologies and instilling attitudes of moderation among students

Hadith interpretation of religious moderation among students and its implications for the radicalization inversion movement at UIN Jakarta

Many studies have cited the massiveness of radical understanding among students in universities. Not only students from public universities, but also come from religious colleges such as UIN and IAIN. Therefore, this study aims; first, to analyze the hadith interpretation of Islamic moderates among students. Second, knowing the implementation of indications of religious moderates among students. Third, knowing the implications of the interpretation of Islamic moderates among students on the inversion-radicalization movement in Indonesia. All interview questions refer to the four pillars of indication of religious moderation initiated by the MORA, namely national commitment, tolerance, non-violence, and acceptance of local culture. This type of study is qualitative, and the approach chosen is hadith-phenomenological. The method used in this study consists of three main methods. First, the descriptive method; second, the critic-analysis method; third, the critic-analysis-reflective. The results of this study provide information that the interpretation of Islamic moderatism among students has a variety of languages interpreted by each student. As for interpreting the hadith, many of them still do not understand and understand the content of the hadith. Based on the questionnaire and interview data, none of the students were free from indications of radicalism. The implications of these findings provide clues to the importance of fostering and socializing ideologies and instilling attitudes of moderation among students

Urgensi fatwa dalam perkembangan hukum Islam

The discussion of this writing is about the role of fatwa in the development of Islamic law. Fatwa is the product of mujtahids’thought to answer particular problems which emerge among societies. Fatwa is closely related to pro and contra differences, it is due to several factors, namely: different reference or quotation of hadits because of condition and place, the difference of understanding the text, methodology, socio-cultural levels, socio-historical and social stratification of the society where mujtahids live and the subjectivity of imams. Owever, the difference becomes a contribution within the development of Islamic law itself.due to the dispute, new ideas or thoughts emerge in Islamic law, as a result, Islamic law can be dynamic law and it can be applied for long. Pembahasan dalam tulisan ini adalah tentang peranan fatwa dalam perkembangan Hukum Islam. Fatwa merupakan produk dari pemikiran para Mujtahid untuk menjawab berbagai persoalan yang muncul ditengah-tengah masyarakat. Fatwa tidak dapat terlepas dari perbedaan pro dan konta. Hal ini disebabkan karena beberapa faktor; perbedaan rujukan atau kutipan nash/hadis karena kondisi dan tempat, perbedaan memahami nash, perbedaan pengetahuan yang mereka miliki (metodologi), perbedaan tingkat sosio cultural, sosio historis dan stratifikasi masyarakat tempat mereka berdomisili, subyektivitas para imam. Namun demikian pro dan kontra yang terjadi menjadi sebuah kontribusi dalam perkembangan pemikiran hokum Islam itu sendiri, hal ini dikarenakan dengan terjadinya pro dan kontra, dapat menimbulkan pemikiran-pemikiran baru dalam hokum Islam, sehingga hokum Islam dapat menjadi hukum yang dinamis dan berlaku sepanjang masa