Combined modality treatment with full-dose chemotherapy and concomitant boost radiotherapy for advanced head and neck carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a treatment concept combining three cycles of full-dose chemotherapy (CT) with concomitant accelerated uninterrupted radiotherapy (RT). Twenty-three patients (median age: 54years, range: 35-70) with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) were included. The primary tumor involved the hypopharynx (n=7), base of the tongue (n=10), nasopharynx (n=2) or upper esophagus (n=1) or its location was unknown (n=3). Treatment consisted of three cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatin 100mg/m2 on day 1; 5-FU 1,000mg/m2 per day for 5days as a continuous infusion, preceded by amifostine 910mg/m2), repeated every 3weeks. Uninterrupted concomitant boost-accelerated RT (total dose of 70Gy in 6weeks) started together on day 1 of the second cycle. All but two patients received the full course of RT. Eighteen patients achieved complete remission (78%). At a median follow-up of 45months the overall survival was 56% (95% c.i. 32-79%) and the loco-regional control 71% (95% c.i. 52-91%). Toxicity involved reversible renal insufficiency of ≥ grade II in 9 patients (39%) and neutropenic fever in 9 patients (39%). All patients suffered from moderate to severe mucositis (grade II/III), and 19 patients presented cutaneous toxicity grade III. Concomitant boost-accelerated RT combined with concurrent full-dose cisplatin/5-FU chemotherapy and amifostine is feasible with manageable, although substantial, toxicity. The overall survival of 4years is promising. Newer regimens causing less acute mucosal and skin toxicity are neede

Clinical Implications of Molecular Neuropathology and Biomarkers for Malignant Glioma

Malignant gliomas are currently diagnosed based on morphological criteria and graded according to the World Health Organization classification of primary brain tumors. This algorithm of diagnosis and classification provides clinicians with an estimated prognosis of the natural course of the disease. It does not reflect the expected response to specific treatments beyond surgery (eg, radiotherapy or alkylating chemotherapy). Clinical experience has revealed that gliomas sharing similar histomorphological criteria might indeed have different clinical courses and exhibit highly heterogenous responses to treatments. This was very impressively demonstrated first for oligodendrogliomas. The presence or lack of combined deletions of the chromosomal segments 1p/19q was associated with different benefit from radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We review current molecular markers for malignant gliomas and discuss their current and future impact on clinical neuro-oncolog

Are integrins still practicable targets for anti-cancer therapy?

Correlative clinical evidence and experimental observations indicate that integrin adhesion receptors, in particular those of the αV family, are relevant to cancer cell features, including proliferation, survival, migration, invasion, and metastasis. In addition, integrins promote events in the tumor microenvironment that are critical for tumor progression and metastasis, including tumor angiogenesis, matrix remodeling, and the recruitment of immune and inflammatory cells. In spite of compelling preclinical results demonstrating that the inhibition of integrin αVβ3/αVβ5 and α5β1 has therapeutic potential, clinical trials with integrin inhibitors targeting those integrins have repeatedly failed to demonstrate therapeutic benefits in cancer patients. Here, we review emerging integrin functions and their proposed contribution to tumor progression, discuss preclinical evidence of therapeutic significance, revisit clinical trial results, and consider alternative approaches for their therapeutic targeting in oncology, including targeting integrins in the other cells of the tumor microenvironment, e.g., cancer-associated fibroblasts and immune/inflammatory cells. We conclude that integrins remain a valid target for cancer therapy; however, agents with better pharmacological properties, alternative models for their preclinical evaluation, and innovative combination strategies for clinical testing (e.g., together with immuno-oncology agents) are needed

Molecular diagnostics of gliomas: the clinical perspective

Significant progress has been made in the molecular diagnostic subtyping of brain tumors, in particular gliomas. In contrast to the classical molecular markers in this field, p53 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status, the clinical significance of which has remained controversial, at least three important molecular markers with clinical implications have now been identified: 1p/19q codeletion, O 6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) mutations. All three are favorable prognostic markers. 1p/19q codeletion and IDH1 mutations are also useful to support and extend the histological classification of gliomas since they are strongly linked to oligodendroglial morphology and grade II/III gliomas, as opposed to glioblastoma, respectively. MGMT promoter methylation is the only potentially predictive marker, at least for alkylating agent chemotherapy in glioblastoma. Beyond these classical markers, the increasing repertoire of anti-angiogenic agents that are currently explored within registration trials for gliomas urgently calls for efforts to identify molecular markers that predict the benefit derived from these novel treatments, to

Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma

Opinion statement: Primary central nervous system lymphoma is a particular challenge in clinical neuro-oncology. In contrast to most other malignant brain tumors, it may be considered a curable disease at least in younger patients who can tolerate intensive treatment regimens. Yet, therapeutic progress has been limited with little measurable improvement in outcome over the last two decades, mainly due to the low incidence of this tumor, which impedes the execution of large randomized clinical trials, and the failure of most large cooperative groups to conduct such trials. Whenever possible, high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is the backbone of the therapeutic regimen. Response rates can be increased by the addition of second agents like ifosfamide or cytarabine, however, their impact on overall survival is less clear. Similarly, the use of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, commonly used in the treatment of B cell lymphomas outside the CNS, remains controversial and has not been examined in adequate clinical trials. The prognosis of patients, who do not qualify for HD-MTX-based chemotherapy, is considerably poorer. Radiation therapy is an active treatment with high response rates but does typically not result in long-lasting remissions. It remains an important therapeutic option as a salvage therapy in patients progressing on or no longer responding to HD-MTX-based treatment. The combination of HD-MTX and radiation therapy does not prolong overall survival. It is associated with significant neurotoxicity, and it should be avoided. Another matter of debate is whether consolidation therapy by other means, such as high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell support, is the most promising regimen. Given these numerous uncertainties, neuro-oncologists should strive for a treatment of PCNSL patients within clinical trials to allow for the development of improved therapeutic regimens

Evaluation of Novel Imidazotetrazine Analogues Designed to Overcome Temozolomide Resistance and Glioblastoma Regrowth

The cellular responses to two new temozolomide (TMZ) analogues, DP68 and DP86, acting against glioblastoma multi- forme (GBM) cell lines and primary culture models are reported. Dose–response analysis of cultured GBM cells revealed that DP68 is more potent than DP86 and TMZ and that DP68 was effective even in cell lines resistant to TMZ. On the basis of a serial neurosphere assay, DP68 inhibits repop- ulation of these cultures at low concentrations. The efficacy of these compounds was independent of MGMT and MMR func- tions. DP68-induced interstrand DNA cross-links were dem- onstrated with H2O2-treated cells. Furthermore, DP68 induced a distinct cell–cycle arrest with accumulation of cells in S phase that is not observed for TMZ. Consistent with this biologic response, DP68 induces a strong DNA damage response, including phosphorylation of ATM, Chk1 and Chk2 kinases, KAP1, and histone variant H2AX. Suppression of FANCD2 expression or ATR expression/kinase activity enhanced anti- glioblastoma effects of DP68. Initial pharmacokinetic analysis revealed rapid elimination of these drugs from serum. Collec- tively, these data demonstrate that DP68 is a novel and potent antiglioblastoma compound that circumvents TMZ resistance, likely as a result of its independence from MGMT and mismatch repair and its capacity to cross-link strands of DN

Targeting integrins in malignant glioma

The integrin family of cell adhesion receptors is emerging as a promising target of anticancer therapy. AlphaVbeta3 and alphaVbeta5 integrins are overexpressed on both glioma cells and tumor vasculature. Cilengitide, the most advanced specific integrin inhibitor in oncology, has shown antitumor activity against glioma in early clinical trials. Durable remissions have been observed in phase I and phase II trials for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) with both lower and higher doses of cilengitide. Pilot trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma in conjunction with standard chemoradiotherapy have been encouraging. Preclinical data suggest synergy with concomitant chemo- and radiation therapy. A pivotal phase III study (CENTRIC) in newly diagnosed GBM patients is currently recruiting. This paper summarizes the current understanding of the role of integrins and their inhibition in gliomagenesis. The background and design of ongoing trials are outline

Use of metformin and outcome of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Pooled analysis

Metformin has been linked to improve survival of patients with various cancers. There is little information on survival of glioblastoma patients after use of metformin. We assessed the association between metformin use and survival in a pooled analysis of patient data from 1,731 individuals from the randomized AVAglio, CENTRIC and CORE trials. We performed multivariate Cox analyses for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) comparing patients' use of metformin at baseline and/or during concomitant radiochemotherapy (TMZ/RT). Further exploratory analyses investigated the effect of metformin with a history of diabetes and nonfasting glucose levels in relation to OS or PFS of glioblastoma patients. Metformin alone or in any combination was not significantly associated with OS or PFS (at baseline, hazard ratio [HR] for OS = 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.65-1.16; HR for PFS = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.64-1.10; during TMZ/RT HR for OS = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.68-1.38; HR for PFS = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.74-1.41). We found a statistically nonsignificant association of metformin monotherapy with glioblastoma survival at baseline (HR for OS = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.42-1.10; HR for PFS = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.36-0.91), but not during the TMZ/RT period (HR for OS = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.51-1.56; HR for PFS = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.64-1.73). Diabetes mellitus or increased nonfasting glucose levels were not associated with a difference in OS or PFS in our selected study population. Metformin did not prolong survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma in our analysis. Additional studies may identify patients with specific tumor characteristics that are associated with potential benefit from treatment with metformin, possibly due to metabolic vulnerabilities