10 research outputs found
Report of the Regional Co-ordination Meeting for the North Sea and Eastern Arctic (RCM NS&EA) 2014
Report of the Regional Co-ordination Meeting for the North Sea and Eastern Arctic (RCM NS&EA) 2014
Swedish University of Agriculture Sciences (SLU Aqua)
Lysekil, Sweden
08-12 September 2014The RCM NS&EA met in Lysekil (Sweden) between 8-12 September 2014. The main purpose of the RCM is coordinate the National Programmes (NP) of the Member States (MS) in the North Sea region for 2015
Report of the Regional Co-ordination Meeting for the North Sea and Eastern Arctic (RCM NS&EA) 2015
The RCM NS&EA met 31st August - 4th September 2015 at den Haag, Netherlands with 27 participants form 11 member states and autonomous regions attending, including representatives of ICES and the Commission. National correspondents from Spain, UK, Denmark, Lithuania, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands were present. The meeting was co-chaired by Katja Ringdahl (Sweden) and Alastair Pout (Scotland).
The RCM N&SEA considered the recommendations from the 11th Liasion meeting and summaries were presented of the work of expert groups and end users for the 2014-15 period to the plenary session of the meeting. The expert groups included WGCATCH, PGDATA, WKISCON2, WKRDB 2014-01, RDB–SC, STECF and the Zagreb meeting on transversal variables. ICES, as a main end user, provided feedback.
A summary was presented of the progress in the regional coordination project (fishPi). This project involves over 40 participants from 12 members states from NS&EA, NA and Baltic regions, two external statistical experts, and ICES. The project has a wide scope of regional cooperation issues including sampling designs, data formats, code lists, PETS, stomach sampling, small scale and recreational sampling, and data quality software production. It has a budget of €400,000, and a one year time line and with a planned completion date of April 2016. A project with identical aims is running in paralleled in the Mediterranean and Black Sea regions
The majority of the ToRs of the RCM NS&EA were addressed by three subgroups: one concerned with data analysis, one with the landing obligation, and one with issues particularly related to role and work of national correspondents
Report of the Regional Co-ordination Meeting for the North Sea and Eastern Arctic (RCM NS&EA) 2013
Report of the Regional Co-ordination Meeting for the North Sea and Eastern Arctic (RCM NS&EA) 2013 final report
European Fisheries Control Agency (EFCA)
Vigo, Spain
09/09/2013-13/09/2013The Regional Coordination Meeting for the North Sea & Eastern Arctic (RCM NS&EA) was held in September 2013 in Vigo (Spain). The main task of the RCM’s is to coordinate the National Programmes (NP), which propose the national data collection to be carried out by the Member States (MS) under the EU Data Collection Framework (DCF). It was envisaged that, from 2104 onwards, data collection by the MS would be carried out under a new framework (DC-MAP). However, the legislation for this framework is not ready yet. Therefore the Commission has decided to extend the present DCF for the time being and the most recent NPs have been adopted for 2014. Since these NP have been adopted without any changes, there is no need for major coordinatio
Report of the Working Group on Commercial Catches (WGCATCH)
The Working Group on Commercial Catches (WGCATCH), chaired by Mike Arm-
strong (UK) and Hans Gerritsen (Ireland), met in ICES HQ, Copenhagen, Denmark,
10–14 November 2014. The meeting was attended by 34 experts from 21 laboratories
or organizations, covering 16 countries.
Currently, an important task for WGCATCH is to improve and review sampling sur-
vey designs for commercial fisheries, particularly those for estimating quantities and
size or age compositions of landings and discards and providing data quality indica-
tors. However, the scope of WGCATCH is broader than this, covering many other
aspects of collection and analysis of data on fishing activities and catches. This will be
end-user driven, and coordinated with the work of other ICES data EGs such as the
Working Group on Biological Parameters (WGBIOP), the Planning Group on Data
Needs for Assessments and Advice (PGDATA) and the Working Group on Recrea-
tional Fisheries Surveys (WGRFS) to ensure synergy and efficiency.
The report of the meeting commences with background information on the formation
of WGCATCH and its overall role. The remainder of the report provides the out-
comes for each of the Terms of Reference (ToRs) and responses to external requests,
the proposed future work plan and the ToRs for the 2015 meeting.
The group formed two large subgroups to deal with the two major terms of reference
which are the development of guidelines for carrying out sampling of catches on
shore and the provision of advice on adapting sampling programmes to deal with the
landing obligation.
In order to evaluate methods and develop guidelines for best practice in carrying out
sampling of commercial sampling of commercial fish catches onshore, a question-
naire was circulated before the meeting. This questionnaire was structured around
guidelines developed by the ICES Workshop on Practical Implementation of Statisti-
cally Sound Catch Sampling Programmes (WKPICS) for best practice at each stage of
the sampling process, and asked for a description of current practices at each of these
stages. Based on these questionnaires, common and specific problems were cata-
logued and potential solutions were identified. At the same time, the discussion of
the questionnaires provided a form of peer-review of the sampling designs and iden-
tified where improvements could be made. WGCATCH provided guidelines for de-
signing a sampling survey and summarized earlier guidelines provided by the 2010
Workshop on methods for merging métiers for fishery based sampling (WKMERGE)
The other main subject addressed by WGCATCH concerns the provision of advice on
adapting sampling protocols to deal with the impact of the introduction of the land-
ing obligation, which will alter discarding practices and result in additional catego-
ries of catch being landed. A second questionnaire was circulated before the meeting
to allow the group to identify the fleets that will be affected and possible issues that
are anticipated, as well as to propose solutions to adapt existing monitoring and
sampling schemes and to quantify bias resulting from the introduction of this regula-
tion. WGCATCH outlined a range of likely scenarios and the expected effects of
these on fishery sampling programmes, and developed guidelines for adapting sam-
pling schemes. The group also explored a range of analyses that could be conducted
in order to quantify bias resulting from the introduction of the landing obligation.
Finally a number of pilot studies/case studies were summarized, highlighting the
practical issues involve
Spatio-temporal overlap of the alien invasive ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and ichthyoplankton in the Bornholm Basin (Baltic Sea)
In 2007 the alien invasive ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi A. Agassiz 1865 was recorded for the first time in the Bornholm Basin, an area which serves as important spawning ground for Baltic fish stocks. Since M. leidyi is capable of preying upon early life stages of fish and further might act as food competitor for fish larvae, it is of major concern to investigate the potential threat that this non-indigenous species poses to the pelagic ecosystem of the Baltic Sea. The present study investigates the temporal and spatial overlap of M. leidyi with eggs and larvae of Baltic cod (Gadus morhua L.) and sprat (Sprattus sprattus L.) in order to assess the potential impact of this new invader on two of the most important Baltic fish stocks. Results show variable inter-seasonal distribution and overlap dynamics and thus different seasonal threat-scenarios for the early life stages of cod and sprat. The spatial overlap between M. leidyi and ichthyoplankton was low for most of the period observed, and we conclude that M. leidyi presently does not have a strong impact. However, we detected situations with high overlaps, e.g. for sprat larvae and cod eggs in spring. As the population dynamics of M. leidyi in the central Baltic are not yet fully understood, a future population explosion of the alien ctenophore with possible effects on fish recruitment cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, a possible shift in peak spawning of cod to the early season, when ctenophore abundances were relatively high, might increase the impact of M. leidyi on cod