Multiple novel prostate cancer susceptibility signals identified by fine-mapping of known risk loci among Europeans

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous common prostate cancer (PrCa) susceptibility loci. We have fine-mapped 64 GWAS regions known at the conclusion of the iCOGS study using large-scale genotyping and imputation in 25 723 PrCa cases and 26 274 controls of European ancestry. We detected evidence for multiple independent signals at 16 regions, 12 of which contained additional newly identified significant associations. A single signal comprising a spectrum of correlated variation was observed at 39 regions; 35 of which are now described by a novel more significantly associated lead SNP, while the originally reported variant remained as the lead SNP only in 4 regions. We also confirmed two association signals in Europeans that had been previously reported only in East-Asian GWAS. Based on statistical evidence and linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure, we have curated and narrowed down the list of the most likely candidate causal variants for each region. Functional annotation using data from ENCODE filtered for PrCa cell lines and eQTL analysis demonstrated significant enrichment for overlap with bio-features within this set. By incorporating the novel risk variants identified here alongside the refined data for existing association signals, we estimate that these loci now explain ∼38.9% of the familial relative risk of PrCa, an 8.9% improvement over the previously reported GWAS tag SNPs. This suggests that a significant fraction of the heritability of PrCa may have been hidden during the discovery phase of GWAS, in particular due to the presence of multiple independent signals within the same regio

How cell culture conditions affect the microstructure and nanomechanical properties of extracellular matrix formed by immortalized human mesenchymal stem cells: An experimental and modelling study

This paper presents an investigation of how different culture media (i.e. basal and osteogenic media) affect the nanomechanical properties and microstructure of the mineralized matrix produced by the human mesenchymal stem cell line Y201, from both an experimental and theoretical approach. A bone nodule (i.e. mineralized matrix) cultured from basal medium shows a more anisotropic microstructure compared to its counterpart cultured from an osteogenic medium. As confirmed by finite element simulations, this anisotropic microstructure explains the bimodal distribution of the corresponding mechanical properties very well. The overall nanomechanical response of the bone nodule from the osteogenic medium is poorer compared to its counterpart from the basal medium. The bone nodules, from both basal and osteogenic media, have shown reverse aging effects in terms of mechanical properties. These are possibly due to the fact that cell proliferation outcompetes the mineralization process

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

AIM: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery. METHODS: This was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January-April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin. RESULTS: Overall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). After adjustment, delay was not associated with a lower rate of complete resection (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.90-1.55, P = 0.224), which was consistent in elective patients only (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.27, P = 0.672). Longer delays were not associated with poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION: One in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease

Keynote Address

Steve joined Maine Historical Society in 2001 and has served as director since 2012. MHS, founded in 1822, is a private non-profit that promotes the preservation of and engagement with Maine history throughout Maine. Steve’s leadership focuses on institutional change, the evolution of the historical field, collaboration, and the development of forward-looking non-profit management models. Among other initiatives, Steve has led the development of the Maine Memory Network, a nationally-recognized digital museum that features online contributions from more than 270 organizations across Maine. Prior to joining MHS, Steve helped found the online Disability History Museum and produce the award-winning NPR documentary Beyond Affliction: The Disability History Project. He also worked in publishing in New York. Steve has an M.A. in History from the University of Massachusetts Amherst and received his B.A. from the University of Richmond

Roundtable: Putting History on the Map in Massachusetts

A roundtable discussion with leaders in Massachusetts public history organizations to catalyze a conversation with the conference attendees about public history in Massachusetts. Topic: Shall we organize the smaller and larger organizations in the public history field to facilitate collaborative public advocacy for the funding of public history, organizing the annual conference, and to share technical know-how, professional expertise, and services? Participation from the audience is encouraged. Each response should be limited to 1-2 minutes