Effectiveness and efficiency of an 11-week exercise intervention for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a controlled study in the context of health services research

Abstract Background Osteoarthritis is the most common reason for pain in older adults, and the individual and economic burden of this disease is immense. The chronic character of osteoarthritis requires a long-term therapeutic treatment. In this regard life-style interventions such as physical exercises that can be carried out by the patient himself are recommended as first line treatment. There is evidence for the short-term benefit of exercise therapy in terms of pain reduction and physical functioning. Nonetheless research agendas highlight the need for multifaceted interventions that incorporate exercise strategies into patient care. Studies should be conducted with appropriate sample sizes and should allow statements on long-term effects as well as cost-utility and safety. These open questions are under the scope of this study. Methods/design This is a controlled study in the context of health services research. The study population consists of n = 1400 subjects with hip or knee osteoarthritis. The intervention group will be recruited from participants of a country-wide health insurance offer for people with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Potential participants for the control group (ratio 10:1 (control vs. intervention) will be filtered out from the insurance data base according to pre-defined matching criteria and asked by letter for their participation. The final statistical twins from the responders (1:1) will be determined via propensity score matching. The progressive training intervention comprises 8 supervised group sessions, supplemented by home exercises (2/week over 11 weeks). Exercises include mobilization, strengthening and training of postural control. Primary outcomes are pain and function measured with the WOMAC Index immediately after the intervention period. Among other things, health related quality of life, self-efficacy, cost utility and safety will be evaluated as secondary outcomes. Participants will be followed up 6, 12 and 24 month after baseline. Discussion Results of this trial will document the effects of clinical as well as economic outcomes in a regular health care setting on the basis of a large sample size. As such, results of this trial might have great impact on future implementations of group- and home-based exercises in hip or knee osteoarthritis. Trail registration German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00009251 . Registered 10 September 2015

Efficacy of conservative treatment regimes for hip osteoarthritis - Evaluation of the therapeutic exercise regime "Hip School": A protocol for a randomised, controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Hip osteoarthritis (hip OA) is a disease with a major impact on both national economy and the patients themselves. Patients suffer from pain and functional impairment in activities of daily life which are associated with a decrease in quality of life. Conservative therapeutic interventions such as physical exercises aim at reducing pain and increasing function and health-related quality of life. However, there is only silver level evidence for efficacy of land-based physical exercise in the treatment of hip OA. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether the specific 12-week exercise regime "Hip School" can decrease bodily pain and improve physical function and life quality in subjects with hip osteoarthritis.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>217 participants with hip OA, confirmed using the clinical score of the American College of Rheumatology, are recruited from the community and randomly allocated to one of the following groups: (1) exercise regime "Hip School", n = 70; (2) Non-intervention control group, n = 70; (3) "Sham" ultrasound group, n = 70; (4) Ultrasound group, n = 7. The exercise regime combines group exercises (1/week, 60-90') and home-based exercises (2/week, 30-40'). Sham ultrasound and ultrasound are given once a week, 15'. Measures are taken directly prior to (M1) and after (M2) the 12-week intervention period. Two follow-ups are conducted by phone 16 and 40 weeks after the intervention period. The primary outcome measure is the change in the subscale <it>bodily pain </it>of the SF36 from M1 to M2. Secondary outcomes comprise the WOMAC score, SF36, isometric strength of hip muscles, spatial-temporal and discrete measures derived from clinical gait analysis, and the length of the centre of force path in different standing tasks. An intension-to-treat analysis will be performed using multivariate statistics (group × time).</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Results from this trial will contribute to the evidence regarding the effect of a hip-specific exercise regime on physical function, pain, and health-related quality of life in patients with hip osteoarthritis.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00000651.</p

Moderators of the effect of therapeutic exercise for knee and hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Background Many international clinical guidelines recommend therapeutic exercise as a core treatment for knee and hip osteoarthritis. We aimed to identify individual patient-level moderators of the effect of therapeutic exercise for reducing pain and improving physical function in people with knee osteoarthritis, hip osteoarthritis, or both. Methods We did a systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing therapeutic exercise with non-exercise controls in people with knee osteoathritis, hip osteoarthritis, or both. We searched ten databases from March 1, 2012, to Feb 25, 2019, for randomised controlled trials comparing the effects of exercise with non-exercise or other exercise controls on pain and physical function outcomes among people with knee osteoarthritis, hip osteoarthritis, or both. IPD were requested from leads of all eligible randomised controlled trials. 12 potential moderators of interest were explored to ascertain whether they were associated with short-term (12 weeks), medium-term (6 months), and long-term (12 months) effects of exercise on self-reported pain and physical function, in comparison with non-exercise controls. Overall intervention effects were also summarised. This study is prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017054049). Findings Of 91 eligible randomised controlled trials that compared exercise with non-exercise controls, IPD from 31 randomised controlled trials (n=4241 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. Randomised controlled trials included participants with knee osteoarthritis (18 [58%] of 31 trials), hip osteoarthritis (six [19%]), or both (seven [23%]) and tested heterogeneous exercise interventions versus heterogeneous non-exercise controls, with variable risk of bias. Summary meta-analysis results showed that, on average, compared with non-exercise controls, therapeutic exercise reduced pain on a standardised 0–100 scale (with 100 corresponding to worst pain), with a difference of –6·36 points (95% CI –8·45 to –4·27, borrowing of strength [BoS] 10·3%, between-study variance [τ2] 21·6) in the short term, –3·77 points (–5·97 to –1·57, BoS 30·0%, τ2 14·4) in the medium term, and –3·43 points (–5·18 to –1·69, BoS 31·7%, τ2 4·5) in the long term. Therapeutic exercise also improved physical function on a standardised 0–100 scale (with 100 corresponding to worst physical function), with a difference of –4·46 points in the short term (95% CI –5·95 to –2·98, BoS 10·5%, τ2 10·1), –2·71 points in the medium term (–4·63 to –0·78, BoS 33·6%, τ2 11·9), and –3·39 points in the long term (–4·97 to –1·81, BoS 34·1%, τ2 6·4). Baseline pain and physical function moderated the effect of exercise on pain and physical function outcomes. Those with higher self-reported pain and physical function scores at baseline (ie, poorer physical function) generally benefited more than those with lower self-reported pain and physical function scores at baseline, with the evidence most certain in the short term (12 weeks). Interpretation There was evidence of a small, positive overall effect of therapeutic exercise on pain and physical function compared with non-exercise controls. However, this effect is of questionable clinical importance, particularly in the medium and long term. As individuals with higher pain severity and poorer physical function at baseline benefited more than those with lower pain severity and better physical function at baseline, targeting individuals with higher levels of osteoarthritis-related pain and disability for therapeutic exercise might be of merit

Hip muscle strength in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip: aspects of the reproducibility of measurement, training and its relevance to self-reported physical function

Background Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip is a common disease among elderly adults and its prevalence increases with age. Hip OA is presumed to be a group of diseases resulting in the same pathological pathway, but its etiology is not completely understood. The major symptoms are joint pain, joint stiffness, impaired range of motion, and muscle weakness resulting in increased levels of physical disability (PD) and reduced quality of life. Besides the impairments of the individual subject a heavy economic burden goes along with the disease and is expected to increase due to aging societies in western countries throughout the upcoming years. Exercise therapy (ET), including elements to strengthen the hip muscles, is a common treatment in hip OA and considered to reduce pain and PD. Currently, there is only silver-level scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of ET in hip OA due to a limited number of high quality studies. Furthermore, the optimal content and dosage, as well as the mode of delivery of ET need to be evaluated. This doctoral thesis deals with three specific aspects of hip muscle strength (HMS) in patients with hip OA: the precision of measuring HMS, training HMS, and the relevance of HMS to physical disability (PD). Three studies and one study protocol provide the scientific program of this thesis, referring to these aspects of HMS. Methods The first study (S1) investigated the reproducibility of isokinetic and isometric HMS measures in patients with hip OA. 16 subjects with unilateral or bilateral hip OA and 13 healthy subjects were tested twice, 7 days apart. A subpopulation of 11 hip OA patients was tested a third time to evaluate familiarization to these measurements. The standard error of measurement (SEM) served as the reproducibility outcome parameter. The second study (S2) investigated the feasibility of strengthening exercises and their effect on HMS in hip patients. 36 participants from an institutional training group for hip patients were allocated randomly to an intervention or control group. While the intervention group completed an eight-week progressive home-based strengthening exercise program (PHSEP) in addition to the weekly institutional supervised group-based exercise therapy (ISET), the control group continued weekly ISET, only. Exercise logs were used to monitor adherence, pain, and the applied exercise intensity of the PHSEP. Before and after the intervention period, HMS was determined using isokinetic concentric and isometric HMS measurements. Additionally, health-related quality of life was assessed by the SF36 questionnaire. These two studies served as a basis for developing strength-specific aspects of a study design for a randomized controlled trial (RCT), which was in progress at the writing of this thesis. This RCT addresses the above-mentioned lack of scientific evidence about the effectiveness of ET in hip OA. A study protocol (P1) describes this RCT, which evaluates the effectiveness of ET on pain and PD in patients with hip OA. 217 patients with hip OA were recruited from the community and allocated to one of the four groups: (1) exercise group, n = 70 (2) non-intervention group, n = 70, (3) “Sham” ultrasound group, n = 70, and (4) ultrasound group, n = 7. The main outcome measure is the change in the subscale bodily pain of the SF36. Secondary outcomes are PD assessed by the SF36 and the WOMAC questionnaire, isometric HMS, several gait variables and postural control. Finally, the relationship of HMS and PD in hip OA was investigated in a third (cross-sectional) study (S3). A stepwise regression model was applied with data from 149 subjects suffering from hip OA. The outcome variable was the self-reported physical disability, assessed with the physical function subscale of the WOMAC questionnaire. Age, gender, body mass index BMI , HMS, pain, stiffness, and range of motion were included in the statistical model as associated factors of PD. Results The results of S1 showed high variability in HMS measurements between days. The highest SEM values, indicating poorest reproducibility, were obtained for hip extension, followed by hip adduction and hip flexion measures, while the smallest values were found for hip abduction measures. Lower reproducibility occurred in patients with hip OA in comparison to healthy controls during the isometric measures of hip abduction, adduction, and flexion. Reproducibility of 11 hip OA patients was lower for the second test sequence (test-day 2 and 3) than for the first test sequence (test-day 1 and 2). The findings of S2 indicated high exercise adherence (99%) of the intervention group to the applied PHSEP. Furthermore, exercise logs reported that pain resulting from the PHSEP was low. HMS improved about 7-11% in comparison to the control group. The SF36 variables did not change throughout the exercise period. In S3, the statistical model revealed stiffness, pain, and HMS to be significant factors of self-reported physical disability in hip OA. Conclusion In conclusion, the precision of several HMS measures may be affected by hip OA and clinicians should be aware of a higher measurement error in patients with hip OA under isometric test conditions than for healthy subjects. A familiarization measurement may be an approach to diminish the measurement error. The applied PHSEP amended to an ISET is feasible for hip patients to carry out and can be applied to improve HMS. Furthermore, a significant cross-sectional relationship between HMS and PD has been evaluated, indicating that HMS may be an important factor to stimulate during exercise therapy in hip OA. The upcoming results of the RCT (P1) described in the study protocol will help to reduce the shortcomings in scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of strengthening exercise regimes to reduce pain and PD in patients with hip OA.:List of content 1 List of figures 3 List of tables 4 List of abbreviations 5 Abstract 8 Zusammenfassung 11 Structure of the thesis 15 1 Background 16 1.1 Osteoarthritis of the hip joint 16 1.1.1 Prevalence and incidence 16 1.1.2 Etiology 17 1.1.3 Clinical symptoms and diagnosis 18 1.1.4 Socioeconomic burden 20 1.2 Hip muscle strength in osteoarthritis of the hip 23 1.2.1 Anatomical and functional aspects of the hip and its muscles 23 1.2.2 General aspects of muscle strength 25 1.2.3 Hip muscle weakness and muscle imbalances 28 1.2.4 Assessment of hip muscle strength 29 1.3 Physical disability in hip OA 35 1.3.1 General aspects of physical disability in hip OA 35 1.3.2 Assessment of physical disability in hip OA 36 1.4 Exercise therapy in hip OA 38 1.4.1 Efficacy of exercise therapy 38 1.4.2 Strengthening exercises in hip OA 39 1.5 Context of the thesis 43 1.5.1 OsteoArthritisGroup (OAG) 43 2 Scientific program - research papers 47 2.1 Research paper 1: Reproducibility of hip muscle strength measurements in hip OA 48 2.2 Research paper 2: Feasibility and efficacy of an 8-week progressive home-based strengthening exercise 58 2.3 Research paper 3: Evaluation of the therapeutic exercise regimen “Hip School": A protocol for a randomized, controlled trial 68 2.4 Research paper 4: Factors of physical disability in patients with hip osteoarthritis 81 3 Comprehensive and supplementary discussion 103 3.1 Strength measurements at the hip 103 3.1.1 Body position and fixation 103 3.1.2 Torque overshoots 104 3.1.3 Objectivity of hip muscle strength measures in osteoarthritis of the hip 104 3.1.4 Reproducibility of hip muscle strength measures in osteoarthritis of the hip 104 3.1.5 Validity of hip muscle strength measures in osteoarthritis of the hip 105 3.1.6 Isometric versus isokinetic hip muscle strength measures 106 3.2 Strengthening exercises in patients with hip OA 106 3.2.1 Feasibility and adherence to the progressive home-based strengthening exercise program 106 3.2.2 Adverse events due to the exercise intervention 107 3.2.3 Strength gains 108 3.2.4 Adaptations of the PHSEP for the RCT 109 3.3 Hip muscle strength and its relation to physical disability in patients with hip OA 110 4 Limitations 112 5 Conclusion and future perspectives 114 6 Reference list 116 7 Appendix 126 8 Affidavit 131 9 Curriculum vitae 132Hintergrund Coxarthrose ist eine weit verbreitete Krankheit in der älteren Bevölkerung westlicher Industrienationen. Die Bedeutung und Zahl der Neuerkrankungen nehmen mit steigendem Lebensalter zu. Schmerz, Steifheit, Bewegungseinschränkungen und Muskelschwäche zählen zu den Leitsymptomen dieser Krankheit, die sich in einer zunehmenden körperlichen Funktionseinschränkung und eingeschränkten Lebensqualität der Patienten äußern. Neben der Bedeutung für die betroffenen Patienten selbst wachsen in westlichen Industrienationen aufgrund der demographischen Entwicklung hin zu einer alternden Gesellschaft der Druck und die finanzielle Belastung auf die Renten- und Gesundheitssysteme. Die Sporttherapie wird häufig in frühen Stadien der Krankheit eingesetzt und zählt zu den konservativen Therapieverfahren. Nach aktuellem Stand der Wissenschaft scheinen sporttherapeutische Interventionen mit Trainingselementen zur Kräftigung der hüftumgebenden Muskulatur sinnvoll. Dennoch wurde die Wirksamkeit von Sporttherapie bei Coxarthrose bisher nur in einzelnen Studien nachgewiesen (Silver-level Evidence). Es fehlen qualitativ hochwertige randomisierte Kontrollgruppenstudien (RCTs). Zudem ist bislang ungeklärt, wie ein optimales Trainingsprogramm bei Coxarthrose hinsichtlich der Inhalte, Dosierung und Durchführungsmodalität zu gestalten ist, um Schmerz und körperliche Funktionseinschränkungen bestmöglich zu therapieren. Vor diesem Hintergrund beschäftigt sich die vorliegende Dissertation mit drei Aspekten der Hüftmuskelkraft bei Patienten mit Coxarthrose. Drei entsprechende Studien, die in vier wissenschaftlichen Artikeln aufgearbeitet wurden, bilden den wissenschaftlichen Schwerpunkt der Arbeit. Methode Die erste Studie (S1) befasst sich mit der Messgenauigkeit von Hüftkraftmessungen bei Coxarthrosepatienten. Unter diesem Aspekt wurden isometrische und isokinetische Kraftmessgrößen an der Hüfte bei 16 Coxarthrosepatienten und 13 gesunden Personen zwei Mal im Abstand von sieben Tagen erhoben. Bei einer Teilstichprobe von 11 Coxarthrosepatienten wurden die Messungen ein drittes Mal durchgeführt, um mögliche Gewöhnungseffekte zu evaluieren. Der Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) wurde verwendet, um den Messfehler zu quantifizieren. Die zweite Studie (S2) greift einen weiteren Aspekt auf, der sich auf das Training der Hüftmuskelkraft bei Hüftpatienten bezieht. Hier wurde die Machbarkeit eines ergänzenden Heimtrainingsprogramms zur Kräftigung der hüftumgebenden Muskulatur evaluiert sowie mögliche Auswirkungen auf die Hüftmuskelkraft untersucht. 36 Teilnehmer einer Hüftsportgruppe mit Coxarthrose und/oder einer Total-Endoprothese (TEP) wurden randomisiert in zwei Untersuchungsgruppen aufgeteilt. Während die Patienten der Kontrollgruppe im Untersuchungszeitraum weiterhin wöchentliche institutionelle sporttherapeutische Trainingseinheiten wahrnahmen, führten die Patienten der Interventionsgruppe zusätzlich Heimtrainingseinheiten zur Kräftigung der Hüftmuskeln durch. Vor und nach der Intervention wurden isometrische und isokinetische Maximalkraftmessungen durchgeführt. Die Patienten der Trainingsgruppe haben ein Trainingstagebuch geführt, um die Teilnahme am Heimtrainingsprogramm und mögliche Schwierigkeiten damit zu dokumentieren. Der SF36 Fragebogen wurde eingesetzt, um die gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität im Verlauf zu kontrollieren. Die Erkenntnisse der beiden beschriebenen Studien wurden verwendet, um kraftspezifische Aspekte eines Studiendesigns zu entwickeln. Dieses Studiendesign entspricht einem RCT und soll die Effektivität eines sporttherapeutischen Trainingskonzepts hinsichtlich Schmerzreduktion und Verbesserung der körperlichen Funktionsfähigkeit überprüfen. 217 Hüftarthrosepatienten werden rekrutiert und randomisiert auf eine der folgenden Untersuchungsgruppen aufgeteilt: (1) Trainingsgruppe, n = 70 (2) Kontrollgruppe ohne Intervention, n = 70, (3) “Schein” Ultraschallgruppe, n = 70, und (4) Ultraschallgruppe, n = 7. Die primäre Zielgröße ist Veränderung in der Subskala „Körperliche Schmerzen“ des SF36-Fragebogens. Sekundäre Zielgrößen sind Schmerz und Körperliche Funktionsfähigkeit aus dem WOMAC-Fragebogen, weiteren Subskalen des SF36-Fragebogens, isometrische Hüftmuskelkraft, verschiedene Variablen des Gangs und posturale Kontrolle. Die Bedeutung der Hüftmuskelkraft auf die alltagsrelevante körperliche Funktionsfähigkeit stellt den dritten Aspekt dieser Dissertation dar und wurde in Studie 3 (S3), einer Querschnittsuntersuchung an 149 Coxarthrosepatienten behandelt. Ziel der Studie war die Untersuchung des Zusammenhangs verschiedener Variablen und der alltagsbezogenen körperlichen Funktionsfähigkeit. In einem statistisches Modell wurde die Beziehung zwischen den Variablen: Hüftmuskelkraft, Body Mass Index (BMI), Alter, Geschlecht, Schmerz, Steifheit und Beweglichkeit der Hüfte und der Subskala „Körperliche Funktionsfähigkeit“ des WOMAC-Fragebogens als Maß für die alltagsbezogene körperlichen Funktionsfähigkeit berechnet. Ergebnisse In der ersten Studie (S1) wurden die größten Messfehler in den Messgrößen Hüftextension ermittelt. Danach folgten die Messgrößen Hüftadduktion und -flexion. Der geringste Messfehler wurde für Hüftabduktion ermittelt. Unter isometrischen Bedingungen wurden in den Kraftmessgrößen Hüftabduktion, -adduktion und -flexion bei Coxarthrosepatienten größere Messfehler quantifiziert als bei gesunden Personen. Zudem war die Reproduzierbarkeit in der ersten Test-Sequenz (Messtag 1 und 2) im Vergleich zur zweiten Test-Sequenz reduziert (Messtag 2 und 3). In der zweiten Studie (S2) konnte gezeigt werden, dass das verwendete Heimtrainingsprogramm sicher und selbstständig von den Hüftpatienten durchgeführt werden konnte. Die Trainingstagebücher ließen auf eine nahezu hundertprozentige Teilnahme am ergänzenden Heimtrainingsprogramm schließen und zeigten außerdem, dass das Heimtrainingsprogramm keine schmerzverursachende Wirkung hatte. Nach der Intervention war die Kraft der hüftumgebenden Muskulatur im Vergleich zur Kontrollgruppe um 7-9% gesteigert. Befunde hinsichtlich einer veränderten Lebensqualität konnten nicht registriert werden. Das statistische Modell, das in der dritten Studie (S3) eingesetzt wurde, erkannte Schmerz, Steifheit und Hüftmuskelkraft als die drei bedeutsamsten Faktoren für die alltagsbezogene körperliche Funktionsfähigkeit bei Patienten mit Coxarthrose. Schlussfolgerungen Kraftmessungen an der Hüfte scheinen erheblichen Tagesschwankungen ausgesetzt zu sein. Bei Coxarthrosepatienten und gesunden Personen scheint sich die Wiederholbarkeit von isokinetischen Kraftmessungen zu ähneln. Unter isometrischen Testbedingungen muss mit höheren Messfehlern bei Coxarthrosepatienten gerechnet und entsprechend bei der Interpretation von Ergebnissen berücksichtigt werden. Eine Gewöhnungsmessung kann den Messfehler reduzieren, birgt allerdings einen erheblich höheren finanziellen und personellen Aufwand. Das ergänzende Heimtrainingsprogramm wurde von den Patienten gut angenommen, so dass lediglich kleinere Modifikationen vorgenommen werden mussten, um es in dem geplanten RCT zu evaluieren. Zudem konnte gezeigt werden, dass die Hüftmuskelkraft zu den drei bedeutsamsten Faktoren zählt, die Einfluss auf die alltagsbezogene körperliche Funktionsfähigkeit bei Patienten mit Coxarthrose haben können. Ob diese Beziehung tatsächlich kausaler Natur ist, werden zukünftige Verlaufsstudien aufzeigen, in denen gezielt solche Faktoren der alltagsrelevanten körperliche Funktionsfähigkeit durch sporttherapeutische Maßnahmen modifiziert werden. Die ausstehenden Ergebnisse des RCT sollen die noch unzureichende wissenschaftliche Beweislage bezüglich der Wirksamkeit sporttherapeutischer Interventionen bei Coxarthrose verbessern. Dabei soll gezeigt werden, ob und in welchem Maß eine Schmerzreduktion und Verringerung der körperlichen Funktionseinschränkung erzielt werden kann.:List of content 1 List of figures 3 List of tables 4 List of abbreviations 5 Abstract 8 Zusammenfassung 11 Structure of the thesis 15 1 Background 16 1.1 Osteoarthritis of the hip joint 16 1.1.1 Prevalence and incidence 16 1.1.2 Etiology 17 1.1.3 Clinical symptoms and diagnosis 18 1.1.4 Socioeconomic burden 20 1.2 Hip muscle strength in osteoarthritis of the hip 23 1.2.1 Anatomical and functional aspects of the hip and its muscles 23 1.2.2 General aspects of muscle strength 25 1.2.3 Hip muscle weakness and muscle imbalances 28 1.2.4 Assessment of hip muscle strength 29 1.3 Physical disability in hip OA 35 1.3.1 General aspects of physical disability in hip OA 35 1.3.2 Assessment of physical disability in hip OA 36 1.4 Exercise therapy in hip OA 38 1.4.1 Efficacy of exercise therapy 38 1.4.2 Strengthening exercises in hip OA 39 1.5 Context of the thesis 43 1.5.1 OsteoArthritisGroup (OAG) 43 2 Scientific program - research papers 47 2.1 Research paper 1: Reproducibility of hip muscle strength measurements in hip OA 48 2.2 Research paper 2: Feasibility and efficacy of an 8-week progressive home-based strengthening exercise 58 2.3 Research paper 3: Evaluation of the therapeutic exercise regimen “Hip School": A protocol for a randomized, controlled trial 68 2.4 Research paper 4: Factors of physical disability in patients with hip osteoarthritis 81 3 Comprehensive and supplementary discussion 103 3.1 Strength measurements at the hip 103 3.1.1 Body position and fixation 103 3.1.2 Torque overshoots 104 3.1.3 Objectivity of hip muscle strength measures in osteoarthritis of the hip 104 3.1.4 Reproducibility of hip muscle strength measures in osteoarthritis of the hip 104 3.1.5 Validity of hip muscle strength measures in osteoarthritis of the hip 105 3.1.6 Isometric versus isokinetic hip muscle strength measures 106 3.2 Strengthening exercises in patients with hip OA 106 3.2.1 Feasibility and adherence to the progressive home-based strengthening exercise program 106 3.2.2 Adverse events due to the exercise intervention 107 3.2.3 Strength gains 108 3.2.4 Adaptations of the PHSEP for the RCT 109 3.3 Hip muscle strength and its relation to physical disability in patients with hip OA 110 4 Limitations 112 5 Conclusion and future perspectives 114 6 Reference list 116 7 Appendix 126 8 Affidavit 131 9 Curriculum vitae 13