10 research outputs found

    Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Posaconazole:an Update

    Get PDF
    Posaconazole is a second-generation triazole agent with a potent and broad antifungal activity. In addition to the oral suspension, a delayed-release tablet and intravenous formulation with improved pharmacokinetic properties have been introduced recently. Due to the large interindividual and intraindividual variation in bioavailability and drug-drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is advised to ensure adequate exposure and improve clinical response for posaconazole. Here, we highlight and discuss the most recent findings on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of posaconazole in the setting of prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections and refer to the challenges associated with TDM of posaconazole

    PCR-based detection of Aspergillus fumigatus Cyp51A mutations on bronchoalveolar lavage : a multicentre validation of the AsperGenius assay® in 201 patients with haematological disease suspected for invasive aspergillosis

    No full text
    Objectives: In patients with invasive aspergillosis (IA), fungal cultures are mostly negative. Consequently, azole resistance often remains undetected. The AsperGenius (R) multiplex real-time PCR assay identifies clinically relevant Aspergillus species and four resistance-associated mutations (RAMs; TR34/L98H/T289A/Y121F) in the Cyp51A gene. This multicentre study evaluated the diagnostic performance of this assay on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and correlated the presence of RAMs with azole treatment failure and mortality. Methods: Stored BAL samples from patients with haematological diseases with suspected IA were used. BAL samples that were galactomannan/culture positive were considered positive controls for the presence of Aspergillus. Azole treatment failure and 6 week mortality were compared in patients with and without RAMs that had received >= 5 days of voriconazole monotherapy. Results: Two hundred and one patients each contributed one BAL sample, of which 88 were positive controls and 113 were negative controls. The optimal cycle threshold cut-off value for the Aspergillus species PCR was >38. With this cut-off, the PCR was positive in 74/88 positive controls. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 84%, 80%, 76% and 87%, respectively. 32/74 BAL samples were culture negative. Azole treatment failure was observed in 6/8 patients with a RAM compared with 12/45 patients without RAMs (P = 0.01). Six week mortality was 2.7 times higher in patients with RAMs (50.0% versus 18.6%; P = 0.07). Conclusions: The AsperGenius (R) assay had a good diagnostic performance on BAL and differentiated WT from Aspergillus fumigatus with RAMs, including in culture-negative BAL samples. Most importantly, detection of RAMs was associated with azole treatment failure

    Scoring the risk of having systemic mastocytosis in adult patients with mastocytosis in the skin

    No full text
    Abstract Background: Mastocytosis in adults often presents with skin lesions. A bone marrow biopsy (BMB) is necessary to confirm or exclude the presence of systemic mastocytosis (SM) in these cases. When a BMB is not performed the provisional diagnosis is mastocytosis in the skin (MIS). No generally accepted scoring system has been established to estimate the risk of SM in these patients. Objective: To develop a risk score to predict SM in adults with MIS. Methods: We examined 1145 patients with MIS from the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) registry who underwent a BMB. 944 patients had SM and 201 patients had cutaneous mastocytosis (CM); 63.7% were female, 36.3% were male. Median age was 44\ub113.3 years. The median serum tryptase level amounted to 29.3\ub181.9 ng/ml. We established a multivariate regression model using the whole population of patients as a training and validation set (bootstrapping). A risk score was developed and validated with receiver operating curves. Results: In the multivariate model, the tryptase level (p<0.001), constitutional/cardiovascular symptoms (p=0.014) and bone symptoms/osteoporosis (p<0.001) were independent predictors of SM (p<0.001, sensitivity 90.7%, specificity 69.1%). A 6-point risk score was established (risk, 10.7-98.0%) and validated. Conclusions: Using a large dataset of the ECNM registry we created a risk score to predict the presence of SM in patients with MIS. Although the score will need further validation in independent cohorts, our score seems to discriminate safely between patients with SM and with pure CM
    corecore