3,398 research outputs found
Selective Migration in New Towns: Influence on Regional Accountability in Early School Leaving
In an attempt to stop the rampant suburbanization, which countries experienced after World War II, a 'new town' policy was enrolled. As a major objective, and related to its origins, new towns were effective in attracting low and medium income households. Nowadays, cities and municipalities experience an increased accountability in which incentives are provided by 'naming and shaming'. This paper focuses on an issue where both historical and local policy come together: early school leaving. Using an iterative matching analysis, it suggests how to account for differences in population and regional characteristics. In other words, how to compare and interpret early school leaving in new towns in a more `fair' way. The results point out that (statistically) mitigating historical differences is necessary, even though this does not necessarily means that 'naming' is replaced by 'shaming'.Urban Economics; New Town; Early School Leaving; Naming and Shaming; Iterative Matching, Urban Planning
Designing a Belief Function-Based Accessibility Indicator to Improve Web Browsing for Disabled People
The purpose of this study is to provide an accessibility measure of
web-pages, in order to draw disabled users to the pages that have been designed
to be ac-cessible to them. Our approach is based on the theory of belief
functions, using data which are supplied by reports produced by automatic web
content assessors that test the validity of criteria defined by the WCAG 2.0
guidelines proposed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) organization. These
tools detect errors with gradual degrees of certainty and their results do not
always converge. For these reasons, to fuse information coming from the
reports, we choose to use an information fusion framework which can take into
account the uncertainty and imprecision of infor-mation as well as divergences
between sources. Our accessibility indicator covers four categories of
deficiencies. To validate the theoretical approach in this context, we propose
an evaluation completed on a corpus of 100 most visited French news websites,
and 2 evaluation tools. The results obtained illustrate the interest of our
accessibility indicator
Second-Order Belief Hidden Markov Models
Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) are learning methods for pattern recognition. The
probabilistic HMMs have been one of the most used techniques based on the
Bayesian model. First-order probabilistic HMMs were adapted to the theory of
belief functions such that Bayesian probabilities were replaced with mass
functions. In this paper, we present a second-order Hidden Markov Model using
belief functions. Previous works in belief HMMs have been focused on the
first-order HMMs. We extend them to the second-order model
Logics of Informational Interactions
The pre-eminence of logical dynamics, over a static and purely propositional view of Logic, lies at the core of a new understanding of both formal epistemology and the logical foundations of quantum mechanics. Both areas appear at first sight to be based on purely static propositional formalisms, but in our view their fundamental operators are essentially dynamic in nature. Quantum logic can be best understood as the logic of physically-constrained informational interactions (in the form of measurements and entanglement) between subsystems of a global physical system. Similarly, (multi-agent) epistemic logic is the logic of socially-constrained informational interactions (in the form of direct observations, learning, various forms of communication and testimony) between “subsystems” of a social system. Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) provides us with a unifying setting in which these informational interactions, coming from seemingly very different areas of research, can be fully compared and analyzed. The DEL formalism comes with a powerful set of tools that allows us to make the underlying dynamic/interactive mechanisms fully transparent
Evidence Propagation and Consensus Formation in Noisy Environments
We study the effectiveness of consensus formation in multi-agent systems
where there is both belief updating based on direct evidence and also belief
combination between agents. In particular, we consider the scenario in which a
population of agents collaborate on the best-of-n problem where the aim is to
reach a consensus about which is the best (alternatively, true) state from
amongst a set of states, each with a different quality value (or level of
evidence). Agents' beliefs are represented within Dempster-Shafer theory by
mass functions and we investigate the macro-level properties of four well-known
belief combination operators for this multi-agent consensus formation problem:
Dempster's rule, Yager's rule, Dubois & Prade's operator and the averaging
operator. The convergence properties of the operators are considered and
simulation experiments are conducted for different evidence rates and noise
levels. Results show that a combination of updating on direct evidence and
belief combination between agents results in better consensus to the best state
than does evidence updating alone. We also find that in this framework the
operators are robust to noise. Broadly, Yager's rule is shown to be the better
operator under various parameter values, i.e. convergence to the best state,
robustness to noise, and scalability.Comment: 13th international conference on Scalable Uncertainty Managemen
- …