7 research outputs found

    Contrasting Monosymptomatic Patients with Hallucinations and Delusions in First-Episode Psychosis Patients: A Five-Year Longitudinal Follow-Up Study

    Get PDF
    Objectives: This thesis explores different symptom profiles found in First Episode Psychosis (FEP) patients assessed at several points of time over a ten year period. Earlier studies have focused predominantly on groups of symptoms rather than individual symptoms when describing course of illness and outcome, and long-term studies of symptom development in epidemiological FEP samples assessed multiples times are lacking. By studying individual symptoms longitudinally from the onset of illness we aimed to gain more knowledge about symptom development and the relationship between symptoms and outcome variables that are known to be affected in psychotic disorders. The aim of the study was threefold: 1) to identify a group of patients with delusions only and a group with hallucinations only, and examine if the groups differed with regard to demographics, clinical variables and outcome measures, and in particular suicidality, 2) to assess the prevalence of apathy ten years after the first psychotic episode, and to explore the association between apathy and general functioning, and between apathy and quality of life, and 3) to identify different flat affect (FA) symptom profiles based on longitudinal symptom trajectories and assess the prevalence and correlates of these trajectories, to assess predictors of enduring FA, and to explore the longitudinal relationship between FA and social functioning. Methods: Three-hundred-and-one first episode, non organic psychosis patients were included in the TIPS Study (Early Treatment and Intervention in Psychosis) and followed over a ten year period. Patients were assessed at baseline, three months, and one, two, five and ten year follow-up with an extensive battery of instruments including measures of demographics, duration of untreated psychosis (DUP), premorbid function (PAS), diagnosis (SCID), symptom measures (PANSS, AES, CDSS), measures of functioning (GAF, SCLFS), suicidality and quality of life (L-QoLI). The relationship of the symptoms of interest, namely hallucinations and delusions (PANSS P1 and P3, respectively), apathy (AES-SApathy and PANSS N2+N4) and flat affect (PANSS N1), to the above measures were assessed with t-test, correlation and regression analyses. Results: Sub-groups of patients with hallucinations only and delusions only can be identified in a five year follow-up study, and the groups differed on multiple variables. Most importantly, the hallucination only group scored higher on measures of suicidality, and insight might be a possible mediator of suicidality in this group. Apathy was found to be a common symptom ten years after the first psychotic episode, affecting 30 % of the sample. Proxy-measures of apathy indicated that this symptom declined in the follow-up period. Clinical apathy was strongly related to poorer functioning and to poorer subjective quality of life in patients ten years after the first psychotic episode. Five different FA trajectory groups were identified. FA was more fluctuant than expected, and only 5 % of the sample experienced enduring FA. Furthermore, FA was related to poorer functional outcome measures, in particular to objective social functioning, both premorbidly and throughout the ten year follow-up period. Conclusions: By looking at individual symptoms rather than groups of symptoms it was possible to shed light on patients with symptom profiles that previously have received limited attention, and to learn more about the long-term development of the individual symptoms. Combined, the findings highlight the importance of looking at symptoms separately in order to both better understand the longitudinal association between symptoms, and to gain knowledge of how individual symptom profiles affect outcome measures including suicidality, quality of life, and social functioning

    Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Get PDF
    Background: General anaesthesia (GA) during endovascular thrombectomy has been associated with worse patient outcomes in observational studies compared with patients treated without GA. We assessed functional outcome in ischaemic stroke patients with large vessel anterior circulation occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy under GA, versus thrombectomy not under GA (with or without sedation) versus standard care (ie, no thrombectomy), stratified by the use of GA versus standard care. Methods: For this meta-analysis, patient-level data were pooled from all patients included in randomised trials in PuMed published between Jan 1, 2010, and May 31, 2017, that compared endovascular thrombectomy predominantly done with stent retrievers with standard care in anterior circulation ischaemic stroke patients (HERMES Collaboration). The primary outcome was functional outcome assessed by ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days in the GA and non-GA subgroups of patients treated with endovascular therapy versus those patients treated with standard care, adjusted for baseline prognostic variables. To account for between-trial variance we used mixed-effects modelling with a random effect for trials incorporated in all models. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane method. The meta-analysis was prospectively designed, but not registered. Findings: Seven trials were identified by our search; of 1764 patients included in these trials, 871 were allocated to endovascular thrombectomy and 893 were assigned standard care. After exclusion of 74 patients (72 did not undergo the procedure and two had missing data on anaesthetic strategy), 236 (30%) of 797 patients who had endovascular procedures were treated under GA. At baseline, patients receiving GA were younger and had a shorter delay between stroke onset and randomisation but they had similar pre-treatment clinical severity compared with patients who did not have GA. Endovascular thrombectomy improved functional outcome at 3 months both in patients who had GA (adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) 1·52, 95% CI 1·09–2·11, p=0·014) and in those who did not have GA (adjusted cOR 2·33, 95% CI 1·75–3·10, p<0·0001) versus standard care. However, outcomes were significantly better for patients who did not receive GA versus those who received GA (covariate-adjusted cOR 1·53, 95% CI 1·14–2·04, p=0·0044). The risk of bias and variability between studies was assessed to be low. Interpretation: Worse outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy were associated with GA, after adjustment for baseline prognostic variables. These data support avoidance of GA whenever possible. The procedure did, however, remain effective versus standard care in patients treated under GA, indicating that treatment should not be withheld in those who require anaesthesia for medical reasons

    Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    No full text
    corecore