28 research outputs found

    OTUB1 triggers lung cancer development by inhibiting RAS monoubiquitination

    Get PDF
    Activation of the RAS oncogenic pathway, frequently ensuing from mutations in RAS genes, is a common event in human cancer. Recent reports demonstrate that reversible ubiquitination of RAS GTPases dramatically affects their activity, suggesting that enzymes involved in regulating RAS ubiquitination may contribute to malignant transformation. Here, we identified the de-ubiquitinase OTUB1 as a negative regulator of RAS mono- and di-ubiquitination. OTUB1 inhibits RAS ubiquitination independently of its catalytic activity resulting in sequestration of RAS on the plasma membrane. OTUB1 promotes RAS activation and tumorigenesis in wild-type RAS cells. An increase of OTUB1 expression is commonly observed in non-small-cell lung carcinomas harboring wild-type KRAS and is associated with increased levels of ERK1/2 phosphorylation, high Ki67 score, and poorer patient survival. Our results strongly indicate that dysregulation of RAS ubiquitination represents an alternative mechanism of RAS activation during lung cancer developmen

    Omkeerbare monoubiquitinatie betrokken bij de regulatie van kleine GTPasen.

    No full text
    status: publishe

    BMMCs with NTAL KD exhibit enhanced actin depolymerization after stimulation with Ag or Ag + SCF.

    No full text
    <p>Cells were activated with Ag (250 ng/ml TNP-BSA; A), SCF (40 ng/ml; B) or Ag + SCF (C). At the indicated times, the cells were fixed, stained for F-actin with Alexa Fluor 488-phalloidin and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data were normalized to fluorescence of resting cells (similar in all cell types). Values indicate mean ± SE (n = 6). *<sup>,+</sup><i>p</i><0.05; **<sup>,++</sup><i>p</i><0.01; ***<sup>,+++</sup><i>p</i><0.001; significant differences between NTAL KOs and WTs (asterisks) and NTAL KDs vs WT pLKOs (crosslets) are shown.</p

    Multiple Regulatory Roles of the Mouse Transmembrane Adaptor Protein NTAL in Gene Transcription and Mast Cell Physiology

    No full text
    <div><p>Non-T cell activation linker (NTAL; also called LAB or LAT2) is a transmembrane adaptor protein that is expressed in a subset of hematopoietic cells, including mast cells. There are conflicting reports on the role of NTAL in the high affinity immunoglobulin E receptor (FcεRI) signaling. Studies carried out on mast cells derived from mice with NTAL knock out (KO) and wild type mice suggested that NTAL is a negative regulator of FcεRI signaling, while experiments with RNAi-mediated NTAL knockdown (KD) in human mast cells and rat basophilic leukemia cells suggested its positive regulatory role. To determine whether different methodologies of NTAL ablation (KO vs KD) have different physiological consequences, we compared under well defined conditions FcεRI-mediated signaling events in mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs) with NTAL KO or KD. BMMCs with both NTAL KO and KD exhibited enhanced degranulation, calcium mobilization, chemotaxis, tyrosine phosphorylation of LAT and ERK, and depolymerization of filamentous actin. These data provide clear evidence that NTAL is a negative regulator of FcεRI activation events in murine BMMCs, independently of possible compensatory developmental alterations. To gain further insight into the role of NTAL in mast cells, we examined the transcriptome profiles of resting and antigen-activated NTAL KO, NTAL KD, and corresponding control BMMCs. Through this analysis we identified several genes that were differentially regulated in nonactivated and antigen-activated NTAL-deficient cells, when compared to the corresponding control cells. Some of the genes seem to be involved in regulation of cholesterol-dependent events in antigen-mediated chemotaxis. The combined data indicate multiple regulatory roles of NTAL in gene expression and mast cell physiology.</p></div

    Decreased NTAL expression after shRNA silencing.

    No full text
    <p>(A) BMMCs were infected with five lentiviral shRNA constructs (NTAL KD 1–5) or empty pLKO.1 construct (WT pLKO). After selection in puromycin, the amount of NTAL was assessed by immunoblotting. For comparison, NTAL in noninfected WT and NTAL KO cells was also evaluated. Actin was used as a loading control. (B) Densitometry analysis of NTAL immunoblots. The data were normalized to the amount of NTAL in WT pLKO cells and that of actin. Means ± SD were calculated from 3–7 independent experiments. ***<i>p</i><0.001.</p

    Length-Dependent Translation Efficiency of ER-Destined Proteins

    No full text
    Gene expression is a fundamental process that enables cells to produce specific proteins in a timely and spatially dependent manner. In eukaryotic cells, the complex organization of the cell body requires precise control of protein synthesis and localization. Certain mRNAs encode proteins with an N-terminal signal sequences that direct the translation apparatus toward a specific organelle. Here, we focus on the mechanisms governing the translation of mRNAs, which encode proteins with an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) signal in human cells. The binding of a signal-recognition particle (SRP) to the translation machinery halts protein synthesis until the mRNA–ribosome complex reaches the ER membrane. The commonly accepted model suggests that mRNA that encodes a protein that contains an ER signal peptide continuously repeats the cycle of SRP binding followed by association and dissociation with the ER. In contrast to the current view, we show that the long mRNAs remain on the ER while being translated. On the other hand, due to low ribosome occupancy, the short mRNAs continue the cycle, always facing a translation pause. Ultimately, this leads to a significant drop in the translation efficiency of small, ER-targeted proteins. The proposed mechanism advances our understanding of selective protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells and provides new avenues to enhance protein production in biotechnological settings

    Differences in transcriptional regulation between NTAL KO and WT cells.

    No full text
    <p>Differences in transcriptional regulation between NTAL KO and WT cells.</p
    corecore